介入手术与单独药物治疗:心脏病患者管理的结果-系统回顾。

Q3 Medicine
Minerva cardioangiologica Pub Date : 2020-12-01 Epub Date: 2020-02-20 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05069-0
Ahmed Abuosa, Ayman Elshiekh, Abdulhalim J Kinsara
{"title":"介入手术与单独药物治疗:心脏病患者管理的结果-系统回顾。","authors":"Ahmed Abuosa,&nbsp;Ayman Elshiekh,&nbsp;Abdulhalim J Kinsara","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05069-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiac patients are managed medically or with an intervention. This review aimed to explore the survival benefit of each approach in the management of cardiac patients. We reviewed updated evidence of survival benefit from the most recent trials and guidelines. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have a mortality benefit when a primary cardiac intervention is implemented. No similar benefit has been shown in chronic stable coronary artery disease. Heart failure patients show a mortality benefit using medication and similarly, mild or moderate valve disease patients do not require an intervention. In atrial fibrillation, the CABANA trial using ablation therapy, had no mortality benefit. Hypertension drug therapy showed a significant mortality benefit, a similar benefit was noted with drug therapy for the treatment of dyslipidemia, when achieving the target lipid goal. Not all interventional procedures result in a mortality benefit. Medical therapy alone increases survival in many cardiac diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":18565,"journal":{"name":"Minerva cardioangiologica","volume":" ","pages":"586-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventional procedures versus medical therapy alone: outcome of cardiac patient management - a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Abuosa,&nbsp;Ayman Elshiekh,&nbsp;Abdulhalim J Kinsara\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05069-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cardiac patients are managed medically or with an intervention. This review aimed to explore the survival benefit of each approach in the management of cardiac patients. We reviewed updated evidence of survival benefit from the most recent trials and guidelines. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have a mortality benefit when a primary cardiac intervention is implemented. No similar benefit has been shown in chronic stable coronary artery disease. Heart failure patients show a mortality benefit using medication and similarly, mild or moderate valve disease patients do not require an intervention. In atrial fibrillation, the CABANA trial using ablation therapy, had no mortality benefit. Hypertension drug therapy showed a significant mortality benefit, a similar benefit was noted with drug therapy for the treatment of dyslipidemia, when achieving the target lipid goal. Not all interventional procedures result in a mortality benefit. Medical therapy alone increases survival in many cardiac diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"586-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva cardioangiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05069-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva cardioangiologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4725.20.05069-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

心脏病患者通过药物治疗或干预治疗。本综述旨在探讨每种方法在心脏病患者治疗中的生存获益。我们从最新的试验和指南中回顾了生存获益的最新证据。st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者在实施初级心脏介入治疗后死亡率降低。在慢性稳定型冠状动脉疾病中没有发现类似的益处。心力衰竭患者使用药物治疗可以降低死亡率,同样,轻度或中度瓣膜疾病患者不需要干预。在房颤中,CABANA试验使用消融术治疗,没有死亡率获益。高血压药物治疗显示出显著的死亡率获益,当达到目标血脂目标时,治疗血脂异常的药物治疗也有类似的获益。并不是所有的介入手术都能降低死亡率。单靠药物治疗可提高许多心脏病患者的生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interventional procedures versus medical therapy alone: outcome of cardiac patient management - a systematic review.

Cardiac patients are managed medically or with an intervention. This review aimed to explore the survival benefit of each approach in the management of cardiac patients. We reviewed updated evidence of survival benefit from the most recent trials and guidelines. Patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have a mortality benefit when a primary cardiac intervention is implemented. No similar benefit has been shown in chronic stable coronary artery disease. Heart failure patients show a mortality benefit using medication and similarly, mild or moderate valve disease patients do not require an intervention. In atrial fibrillation, the CABANA trial using ablation therapy, had no mortality benefit. Hypertension drug therapy showed a significant mortality benefit, a similar benefit was noted with drug therapy for the treatment of dyslipidemia, when achieving the target lipid goal. Not all interventional procedures result in a mortality benefit. Medical therapy alone increases survival in many cardiac diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva cardioangiologica
Minerva cardioangiologica CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Journal on Heart and Vascular Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信