牙间器械对磨牙区牙菌斑的去除效果。

IF 0.5 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College Pub Date : 2020-03-12 Epub Date: 2020-02-20 DOI:10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005
Ryuichi Hisanaga, Akimasa Shinya, Toru Sato, Syuntaro Nomoto, Mamoru Yotsuya
{"title":"牙间器械对磨牙区牙菌斑的去除效果。","authors":"Ryuichi Hisanaga,&nbsp;Akimasa Shinya,&nbsp;Toru Sato,&nbsp;Syuntaro Nomoto,&nbsp;Mamoru Yotsuya","doi":"10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many types of interdental instrument, such as dental floss and interdental brushes, can be purchased easily and sell in large numbers. Many studies have compared the effects of such instruments. Few studies have investigated their relationship with regions of residual plaque, however. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of plaque removal from the mesial and distal surfaces of the bilateral maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars among 3 types of interdental instrument: finger-winding-dental floss, holder-type dental floss, and an interdental brush. Prior to the experiment, the artificial teeth in a jaw model were removed for application of artificial plaque. The teeth were then replaced and the model attached to a phantom. An operator brushed the teeth in a posture close to that adopted in actual tooth brushing with each type of instrument, after which the plaque removal rate was compared among them. The rate of plaque removal using finger-winding floss was the highest, although this type of instrument is less easy to hold than the others. The rate with a handle-equipped interdental instrument showed a decrease in some regions, although it is easy to hold. The results of this study suggest that the type of interdental instrument used should differ depending on the region to be cleaned.</p>","PeriodicalId":45490,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College","volume":"61 1","pages":"21-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plaque-removing Effects of Interdental Instruments in Molar Region.\",\"authors\":\"Ryuichi Hisanaga,&nbsp;Akimasa Shinya,&nbsp;Toru Sato,&nbsp;Syuntaro Nomoto,&nbsp;Mamoru Yotsuya\",\"doi\":\"10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Many types of interdental instrument, such as dental floss and interdental brushes, can be purchased easily and sell in large numbers. Many studies have compared the effects of such instruments. Few studies have investigated their relationship with regions of residual plaque, however. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of plaque removal from the mesial and distal surfaces of the bilateral maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars among 3 types of interdental instrument: finger-winding-dental floss, holder-type dental floss, and an interdental brush. Prior to the experiment, the artificial teeth in a jaw model were removed for application of artificial plaque. The teeth were then replaced and the model attached to a phantom. An operator brushed the teeth in a posture close to that adopted in actual tooth brushing with each type of instrument, after which the plaque removal rate was compared among them. The rate of plaque removal using finger-winding floss was the highest, although this type of instrument is less easy to hold than the others. The rate with a handle-equipped interdental instrument showed a decrease in some regions, although it is easy to hold. The results of this study suggest that the type of interdental instrument used should differ depending on the region to be cleaned.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"21-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/2/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2019-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/2/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

许多种类的牙间器具,如牙线和牙间刷,可以很容易地购买和大量销售。许多研究比较了这些仪器的效果。然而,很少有研究调查它们与残留斑块区域的关系。本研究的目的是比较三种牙间器械:手指缠绕牙线、固定式牙线和牙间刷对双侧上颌前磨牙和磨牙中、远端表面菌斑的去除率。实验前取下下颌模型中的假牙,应用人工牙菌斑。然后更换牙齿,并将模型连接到一个幻影上。操作人员使用每种器械以接近实际刷牙时的姿势刷牙,然后比较两种器械的牙菌斑去除率。使用手指缠绕牙线去除牙菌斑的比率最高,尽管这种类型的工具比其他工具更不容易持有。在某些地区,配备手柄的牙间器械的比率有所下降,尽管它很容易持有。这项研究的结果表明,所使用的牙间器械的类型应根据要清洁的区域而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Plaque-removing Effects of Interdental Instruments in Molar Region.

Many types of interdental instrument, such as dental floss and interdental brushes, can be purchased easily and sell in large numbers. Many studies have compared the effects of such instruments. Few studies have investigated their relationship with regions of residual plaque, however. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of plaque removal from the mesial and distal surfaces of the bilateral maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars among 3 types of interdental instrument: finger-winding-dental floss, holder-type dental floss, and an interdental brush. Prior to the experiment, the artificial teeth in a jaw model were removed for application of artificial plaque. The teeth were then replaced and the model attached to a phantom. An operator brushed the teeth in a posture close to that adopted in actual tooth brushing with each type of instrument, after which the plaque removal rate was compared among them. The rate of plaque removal using finger-winding floss was the highest, although this type of instrument is less easy to hold than the others. The rate with a handle-equipped interdental instrument showed a decrease in some regions, although it is easy to hold. The results of this study suggest that the type of interdental instrument used should differ depending on the region to be cleaned.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College
Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The bulletin of Tokyo Dental collegue is principally for the publication of original contributions to multidisciplinary research in dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信