结肠镜检查时薄荷油的抗痉挛作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Muhammad Aziz, Sachit Sharma, Sami Ghazaleh, Rawish Fatima, Ashu Acharya, Marcel Ghanim, Taha Sheikh, Wade Lee-Smith, Syed U Hamdani, Ali Nawras
{"title":"结肠镜检查时薄荷油的抗痉挛作用:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Muhammad Aziz,&nbsp;Sachit Sharma,&nbsp;Sami Ghazaleh,&nbsp;Rawish Fatima,&nbsp;Ashu Acharya,&nbsp;Marcel Ghanim,&nbsp;Taha Sheikh,&nbsp;Wade Lee-Smith,&nbsp;Syed U Hamdani,&nbsp;Ali Nawras","doi":"10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02652-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple pharmacological agents have been studied in literature with antispasmodic effect during colonoscopy. Peppermint oil, with its relaxing effect on colon has demonstrated varying results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to evaluate its role during colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Literature search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed\\Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Outcomes that were evaluated included incidence of any spasticity, severe spasticity, and peristalsis during examination. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was evaluated as a quality outcome metric. Risk ratios (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method and random effects where applicable.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, six studies (with one abstract) were included in this review. Peppermint oil resulted in overall lower incidence for spasticity (RD: -0.39, P=0.02), severe spasticity (RD: -0.15, P=0.04), and peristalsis (-0.27, P≤0.001) during colonoscopy examination. An improved ADR (RR: 1.31, P=0.01) was also noted, however only two studies evaluated this effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peppermint oil resulted in relaxation of colon during colonoscopy with decrease incidence of spasticity, severe spasticity, peristalsis and improved ADR. These results are encouraging however results are limited due to significant heterogeneity found in the outcomes. Larger studies with standardized dosing are needed to evaluate this effect. Furthermore, studies evaluating additional colonoscopy outcomes such as polyp detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, and serrated adenoma detection rate are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74201,"journal":{"name":"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica","volume":"66 2","pages":"164-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The anti-spasmodic effect of peppermint oil during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Aziz,&nbsp;Sachit Sharma,&nbsp;Sami Ghazaleh,&nbsp;Rawish Fatima,&nbsp;Ashu Acharya,&nbsp;Marcel Ghanim,&nbsp;Taha Sheikh,&nbsp;Wade Lee-Smith,&nbsp;Syed U Hamdani,&nbsp;Ali Nawras\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02652-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Multiple pharmacological agents have been studied in literature with antispasmodic effect during colonoscopy. Peppermint oil, with its relaxing effect on colon has demonstrated varying results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to evaluate its role during colonoscopy.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>Literature search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed\\\\Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Outcomes that were evaluated included incidence of any spasticity, severe spasticity, and peristalsis during examination. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was evaluated as a quality outcome metric. Risk ratios (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method and random effects where applicable.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Overall, six studies (with one abstract) were included in this review. Peppermint oil resulted in overall lower incidence for spasticity (RD: -0.39, P=0.02), severe spasticity (RD: -0.15, P=0.04), and peristalsis (-0.27, P≤0.001) during colonoscopy examination. An improved ADR (RR: 1.31, P=0.01) was also noted, however only two studies evaluated this effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Peppermint oil resulted in relaxation of colon during colonoscopy with decrease incidence of spasticity, severe spasticity, peristalsis and improved ADR. These results are encouraging however results are limited due to significant heterogeneity found in the outcomes. Larger studies with standardized dosing are needed to evaluate this effect. Furthermore, studies evaluating additional colonoscopy outcomes such as polyp detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, and serrated adenoma detection rate are needed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica\",\"volume\":\"66 2\",\"pages\":\"164-171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02652-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/1/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva gastroenterologica e dietologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1121-421X.20.02652-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

文献中研究了多种药物在结肠镜检查中具有抗痉挛作用。薄荷油对结肠有放松作用,已经显示出不同的效果。因此,我们对现有文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估其在结肠镜检查中的作用。证据获取:对PubMed\Medline、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science和CINAHL进行文献检索。评估的结果包括检查期间任何痉挛、严重痉挛和蠕动的发生率。腺瘤检出率(ADR)作为质量指标进行评估。采用dersimonan - laird方法计算风险比(RR)、风险差(RD)和平均差(MD),适用时采用随机效应。证据综合:本综述共纳入6项研究(含1份摘要)。薄荷油导致结肠镜检查时痉挛(RD: -0.39, P=0.02)、严重痉挛(RD: -0.15, P=0.04)和蠕动(-0.27,P≤0.001)的总体发生率降低。改善的不良反应(RR: 1.31, P=0.01)也被注意到,但只有两项研究评估了这种效果。结论:薄荷油可使结肠镜检查时的结肠松弛,降低痉挛、严重痉挛、蠕动的发生率,改善不良反应。这些结果令人鼓舞,但由于结果中发现的显著异质性,结果受到限制。需要更大规模的标准化剂量研究来评估这种效果。此外,还需要研究评估其他结肠镜检查结果,如息肉检出率、晚期腺瘤检出率和锯齿状腺瘤检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The anti-spasmodic effect of peppermint oil during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: Multiple pharmacological agents have been studied in literature with antispasmodic effect during colonoscopy. Peppermint oil, with its relaxing effect on colon has demonstrated varying results. We therefore conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to evaluate its role during colonoscopy.

Evidence acquisition: Literature search of the following databases was undertaken: PubMed\Medline, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Outcomes that were evaluated included incidence of any spasticity, severe spasticity, and peristalsis during examination. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) was evaluated as a quality outcome metric. Risk ratios (RR), risk difference (RD) and mean difference (MD) were calculated using the DerSimonian-Laird method and random effects where applicable.

Evidence synthesis: Overall, six studies (with one abstract) were included in this review. Peppermint oil resulted in overall lower incidence for spasticity (RD: -0.39, P=0.02), severe spasticity (RD: -0.15, P=0.04), and peristalsis (-0.27, P≤0.001) during colonoscopy examination. An improved ADR (RR: 1.31, P=0.01) was also noted, however only two studies evaluated this effect.

Conclusions: Peppermint oil resulted in relaxation of colon during colonoscopy with decrease incidence of spasticity, severe spasticity, peristalsis and improved ADR. These results are encouraging however results are limited due to significant heterogeneity found in the outcomes. Larger studies with standardized dosing are needed to evaluate this effect. Furthermore, studies evaluating additional colonoscopy outcomes such as polyp detection rate, advanced adenoma detection rate, and serrated adenoma detection rate are needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信