通过危机干预在新加坡精神科病房减少约束期间的伤害。

Q3 Medicine
D Poremski, E Loo, C Y W Chan, L D Li, D Fung
{"title":"通过危机干预在新加坡精神科病房减少约束期间的伤害。","authors":"D Poremski,&nbsp;E Loo,&nbsp;C Y W Chan,&nbsp;L D Li,&nbsp;D Fung","doi":"10.12809/eaap1811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The application of restraints during psychiatric crises is a serious adverse event. We aimed to reduce the number of injuries sustained by patients during the application of restraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Structured interviews were conducted with 10 staff to determine six root causes of patient injury during restraint. Three plan-do-study-act cycles were implemented: (1) reorganising shift rosters to pair trained staff with inexperienced staff, (2) holding monthly session for practising de-escalation and restraint techniques as a team in a supervised setting, and (3) rotating the responsibility for leading the de-escalation in real crises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-intervention period was from January 2014 to December 2014 (28 251 inpatient bed days). Intervention period was from January 2015 to March 2015 (7121 inpatient bed days). Post-intervention period was from April 2015 to December 2016 (51 735 inpatient bed days). Data extracted included the dates and numbers of crises, activation of the crisis team, use of restraints, and injuries. During pre-intervention and intervention periods, only two minor and three moderate injuries were recorded. During post-intervention period, no injury was recorded and the number of restraints decreased gradually although the number of crisis team activations increased in the early phase. Eventually restraints were used only upon arrival of the crisis team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our quality improvement project identified six root causes and implemented three plan-do-study-act cycles to successfully eliminated patient injuries during the use of restraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":39171,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reducing Injury During Restraint by Crisis Intervention in Psychiatric Wards in Singapore.\",\"authors\":\"D Poremski,&nbsp;E Loo,&nbsp;C Y W Chan,&nbsp;L D Li,&nbsp;D Fung\",\"doi\":\"10.12809/eaap1811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The application of restraints during psychiatric crises is a serious adverse event. We aimed to reduce the number of injuries sustained by patients during the application of restraints.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Structured interviews were conducted with 10 staff to determine six root causes of patient injury during restraint. Three plan-do-study-act cycles were implemented: (1) reorganising shift rosters to pair trained staff with inexperienced staff, (2) holding monthly session for practising de-escalation and restraint techniques as a team in a supervised setting, and (3) rotating the responsibility for leading the de-escalation in real crises.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-intervention period was from January 2014 to December 2014 (28 251 inpatient bed days). Intervention period was from January 2015 to March 2015 (7121 inpatient bed days). Post-intervention period was from April 2015 to December 2016 (51 735 inpatient bed days). Data extracted included the dates and numbers of crises, activation of the crisis team, use of restraints, and injuries. During pre-intervention and intervention periods, only two minor and three moderate injuries were recorded. During post-intervention period, no injury was recorded and the number of restraints decreased gradually although the number of crisis team activations increased in the early phase. Eventually restraints were used only upon arrival of the crisis team.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our quality improvement project identified six root causes and implemented three plan-do-study-act cycles to successfully eliminated patient injuries during the use of restraints.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap1811\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Archives of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/eaap1811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:精神危机时使用束缚是一种严重的不良事件。我们的目的是减少患者在使用约束时受伤的数量。方法:对10名工作人员进行结构化访谈,以确定患者在约束期间受伤的6个根本原因。实施了三个计划-执行-研究-行动循环:(1)重组轮班表,使训练有素的员工与没有经验的员工配对;(2)在监督的环境下,每月举行一次小组会议,练习缓和紧张局势和克制技巧;(3)在实际危机中轮流负责领导缓和紧张局势的工作。结果:预干预期为2014年1月至2014年12月(28 251住院天数)。干预期为2015年1月至2015年3月(7121住院日)。干预后时间为2015年4月至2016年12月(51735住院日)。提取的数据包括危机的日期和数量、危机小组的激活、约束的使用和伤害。在干预前和干预期间,仅记录了2例轻伤和3例中度损伤。在干预后的阶段,没有受伤的记录,限制的数量逐渐减少,尽管危机小组的激活数量在早期有所增加。最终,只有在危机处理小组到达后才使用了束缚。结论:我们的质量改进项目确定了六个根本原因,并实施了三个计划-做-研究-行动循环,成功地消除了患者在使用约束时的伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reducing Injury During Restraint by Crisis Intervention in Psychiatric Wards in Singapore.

Objective: The application of restraints during psychiatric crises is a serious adverse event. We aimed to reduce the number of injuries sustained by patients during the application of restraints.

Methods: Structured interviews were conducted with 10 staff to determine six root causes of patient injury during restraint. Three plan-do-study-act cycles were implemented: (1) reorganising shift rosters to pair trained staff with inexperienced staff, (2) holding monthly session for practising de-escalation and restraint techniques as a team in a supervised setting, and (3) rotating the responsibility for leading the de-escalation in real crises.

Results: Pre-intervention period was from January 2014 to December 2014 (28 251 inpatient bed days). Intervention period was from January 2015 to March 2015 (7121 inpatient bed days). Post-intervention period was from April 2015 to December 2016 (51 735 inpatient bed days). Data extracted included the dates and numbers of crises, activation of the crisis team, use of restraints, and injuries. During pre-intervention and intervention periods, only two minor and three moderate injuries were recorded. During post-intervention period, no injury was recorded and the number of restraints decreased gradually although the number of crisis team activations increased in the early phase. Eventually restraints were used only upon arrival of the crisis team.

Conclusion: Our quality improvement project identified six root causes and implemented three plan-do-study-act cycles to successfully eliminated patient injuries during the use of restraints.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry
East Asian Archives of Psychiatry Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信