剖腹手术患者的前瞻性混合方法研究(ReLap研究;DRKS00013001)

IF 1.1 Q3 SURGERY
Dinh Thien-An Tran , Colette Doerr-Harim , Felix J. Hüttner , Julian C. Harnoss , Phillip Knebel , Martin Schneider , Markus W. Büchler , Markus K. Diener , Pascal Probst
{"title":"剖腹手术患者的前瞻性混合方法研究(ReLap研究;DRKS00013001)","authors":"Dinh Thien-An Tran ,&nbsp;Colette Doerr-Harim ,&nbsp;Felix J. Hüttner ,&nbsp;Julian C. Harnoss ,&nbsp;Phillip Knebel ,&nbsp;Martin Schneider ,&nbsp;Markus W. Büchler ,&nbsp;Markus K. Diener ,&nbsp;Pascal Probst","doi":"10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":42077,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","volume":"9 ","pages":"Pages 6-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)\",\"authors\":\"Dinh Thien-An Tran ,&nbsp;Colette Doerr-Harim ,&nbsp;Felix J. Hüttner ,&nbsp;Julian C. Harnoss ,&nbsp;Phillip Knebel ,&nbsp;Martin Schneider ,&nbsp;Markus W. Büchler ,&nbsp;Markus K. Diener ,&nbsp;Pascal Probst\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Surgery Protocols\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 6-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.isjp.2018.04.004\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Surgery Protocols\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246835741830007X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S246835741830007X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

背景:在临床试验中,接受再剖腹手术的患者数量不足。标准治疗、与初次剖腹手术相比的相对结果和理想的筋膜闭合技术尚不清楚。ReLap研究有三个目的:首先,确定护理标准,并获得剖腹手术患者与初次剖腹手术患者的手术内/术后结果的证据。其次,在接受再开腹手术或初次剖腹手术的患者中,获得临床转化方法中生物标志物与粘连等级之间关联的证据。第三,为了获得证据,证明再开腹手术后使用Monomax 2-0小针技术与使用PDS 1环的大针技术进行筋膜闭合的可行性和比较有效性。方法ReLap研究是一项单中心、前瞻性、混合方法的探索性研究,分为卫生保健研究、转化研究和随机对照试验三步。所有计划在海德堡大学进行择期剖腹手术或再开腹手术的患者将进行资格筛选。住院期间将有五次研究访问,手术后一年将有一次研究访问。将遵循临床过程,并将前瞻性地获取满足研究目标所需的结果。适合小针和大针缝合的再开腹手术患者将在术中随机选择一种缝合技术。ReLap研究将弥合关于接受剖腹手术患者的重要知识差距。再开腹手术和剖腹手术在护理标准上的差异将被确定。将探讨生物标志物与粘连表现之间的关系,并为再开腹手术后筋膜闭合的相对有效性提供证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)

Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)

Prospective mixed-methods study of patients undergoing relaparotomy (ReLap study; DRKS00013001)

Background

Patients undergoing relaparotomies are underrepresented in clinical trials. Standard of care, relative outcomes compared to primary laparotomy, and the ideal fascial closure technique are unknown.

Objective

The ReLap study has three objectives: First, to determine standard of care and gain evidence of intra-/postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing relaparotomy compared to patients undergoing primary laparotomy. Second, to gain evidence of an association between biomarkers and adhesion grade in a clinical-translational approach in patients undergoing relaparotomy or primary laparotomy. Third, to gain evidence of the feasibility and comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy using the small stitches technique with Monomax 2–0 versus the large stitches technique with PDS 1 loop.

Methods

The ReLap study is a monocentric, prospective, mixed-methods, exploratory study with three steps: health care research, translational research, and randomized controlled trial. All patients scheduled for elective laparotomies or relaparotomies at the University of Heidelberg will be screened for eligibility. There will be five study visits during the hospital stay and one study visit one year after surgery. The clinical course will be followed and outcomes necessary to answer the study objectives will be captured prospectively. Relaparotomy patients eligible for closure with the small and large stitches technique will be randomized intraoperatively to one technique.

Discussion

The ReLap study will bridge a significant knowledge gap regarding patients undergoing relaparotomy. Differences in the standard of care between relaparotomies and primary laparotomies will be determined. The relation between biomarkers and manifestation of adhesions will be explored and evidence for the comparative effectiveness of fascial closure after relaparotomy will be gained.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: IJS Protocols is the first peer-reviewed, international, open access journal seeking to publish research protocols across across the full breadth of the surgical field. We are aim to provide rapid submission to decision times whilst maintaining a high quality peer-review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信