Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero, Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Carlota Méndez-Barrio, Miguel De Miguel-Tristancho, Eugenia Graciani-Cantisán, María Bernal Sánchez-Arjona, Didier Maillet, María Dolores Jiménez-Hernández, Emilio Franco-Macías
{"title":"用于诊断失忆性轻度认知障碍的 TMA-93：与自由选择性记忆测试和诱导选择性记忆测试的比较。","authors":"Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero, Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Carlota Méndez-Barrio, Miguel De Miguel-Tristancho, Eugenia Graciani-Cantisán, María Bernal Sánchez-Arjona, Didier Maillet, María Dolores Jiménez-Hernández, Emilio Franco-Macías","doi":"10.1177/1533317519848230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Phase I diagnostic evaluation study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.</p>","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":"34 5","pages":"322-328"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TMA-93 for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparison With the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Rodrigo-Herrero, Cristóbal Carnero-Pardo, Carlota Méndez-Barrio, Miguel De Miguel-Tristancho, Eugenia Graciani-Cantisán, María Bernal Sánchez-Arjona, Didier Maillet, María Dolores Jiménez-Hernández, Emilio Franco-Macías\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1533317519848230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong></p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Phase I diagnostic evaluation study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias\",\"volume\":\"34 5\",\"pages\":\"322-328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317519848230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/5/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317519848230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
TMA-93 for Diagnosing Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Comparison With the Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test.
Background: TMA-93 examines binding by images, an advantage for the less educated individuals.
Aim: To compare the discriminative validity of TMA-93 against the picture version of Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test (FCSRT) to distinguish patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) from normal controls (NCs) without excluding less educated individuals.
Methods:
Design: Phase I diagnostic evaluation study.
Participants: A total of 30 patients with aMCI and 30 NCs matched for sociodemographics variables.
Statistical analysis: The diagnostic accuracy for each test was calculated by conducting receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Hanley and McNeil method was used to compare diagnostic accuracy of different tests on the same sample.
Results: Up to 41.7% of the sample had less than a first grade of education. Both tests showed excellent diagnostic accuracy. The comparisons did not show significant differences.
Conclusions: TMA-93 is so accurate as FCSRT to differentiate aMCI from controls including less educated individuals. The test could be considered as a choice in this sociodemographic context.
期刊介绍：
American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
