不同卫生专业人员在分子基因检测质量实践继续教育活动中的学习经验评估。

Bin Chen, Shahram Shahangian, Thomas H Taylor, Ajay Yesupriya, Carol Greene, Valerie J Curry, Barbara Zehnbauer
{"title":"不同卫生专业人员在分子基因检测质量实践继续教育活动中的学习经验评估。","authors":"Bin Chen,&nbsp;Shahram Shahangian,&nbsp;Thomas H Taylor,&nbsp;Ajay Yesupriya,&nbsp;Carol Greene,&nbsp;Valerie J Curry,&nbsp;Barbara Zehnbauer","doi":"10.29074/ascls.29.4.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to evaluate the responses of 3,265 health professionals who took a continuing education (CE) activity during June 2009 - April 2012 for a comprehensive set of good laboratory practice recommendations for molecular genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants completed an evaluation questionnaire as part of the CE activity. Responses were summarized to assess the participants' learning outcomes and commitment to applying the knowledge gained.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants included nurses (47%), laboratory professionals (18%), physicians (14%), health educators (4%), public health professionals (2%), office staff (1%), and other health professionals (10%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 32% of all participants correctly answered all 12 open-book knowledge-check questions, ranging from 4 to 42% among the different professional groups (<i>P</i><0.0001). However, over 80% of all participants expressed confidence in describing the practice recommendations, and 75% indicated the recommendations would improve the quality of their practice. Developing health education materials and local practice guidelines represented the common areas in which participants planned to use the knowledge gained (49% and 18% of all participants, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite perceived self-efficacy in most participants, as high as 68% did not fully use the learning materials provided to answer the knowledge-check questions. These findings suggest the need for improved CE activities that motivate effective learning and address the specific needs of different health professions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72611,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","volume":"29 4","pages":"200-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477687/pdf/nihms-1022258.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.\",\"authors\":\"Bin Chen,&nbsp;Shahram Shahangian,&nbsp;Thomas H Taylor,&nbsp;Ajay Yesupriya,&nbsp;Carol Greene,&nbsp;Valerie J Curry,&nbsp;Barbara Zehnbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.29074/ascls.29.4.200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was conducted to evaluate the responses of 3,265 health professionals who took a continuing education (CE) activity during June 2009 - April 2012 for a comprehensive set of good laboratory practice recommendations for molecular genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Participants completed an evaluation questionnaire as part of the CE activity. Responses were summarized to assess the participants' learning outcomes and commitment to applying the knowledge gained.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants included nurses (47%), laboratory professionals (18%), physicians (14%), health educators (4%), public health professionals (2%), office staff (1%), and other health professionals (10%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 32% of all participants correctly answered all 12 open-book knowledge-check questions, ranging from 4 to 42% among the different professional groups (<i>P</i><0.0001). However, over 80% of all participants expressed confidence in describing the practice recommendations, and 75% indicated the recommendations would improve the quality of their practice. Developing health education materials and local practice guidelines represented the common areas in which participants planned to use the knowledge gained (49% and 18% of all participants, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite perceived self-efficacy in most participants, as high as 68% did not fully use the learning materials provided to answer the knowledge-check questions. These findings suggest the need for improved CE activities that motivate effective learning and address the specific needs of different health professions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology\",\"volume\":\"29 4\",\"pages\":\"200-211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6477687/pdf/nihms-1022258.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.29.4.200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory science : journal of the American Society for Medical Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29074/ascls.29.4.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估2009年6月至2012年4月期间参加继续教育(CE)活动的3,265名卫生专业人员的反应,以获得一套全面的分子基因检测良好实验室规范建议。设计:参与者完成一份评估问卷,作为CE活动的一部分。对参与者的回答进行总结,以评估他们的学习成果和应用所学知识的承诺。参与者:参与者包括护士(47%)、实验室专业人员(18%)、医生(14%)、健康教育者(4%)、公共卫生专业人员(2%)、办公室工作人员(1%)和其他卫生专业人员(10%)。结果:只有32%的被试正确回答了所有12道开卷式知识测验的问题,在不同的专业群体中,这一比例从4%到42%不等(p结论:尽管大多数被试有自我效能感,但高达68%的被试没有充分利用所提供的学习材料来回答知识测验的问题。这些发现表明,有必要改进教学活动,以激发有效的学习,并满足不同卫生专业人员的具体需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.

Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.

Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.

Evaluation of Diverse Health Professionals' Learning Experience in a Continuing Education Activity for Quality Practices in Molecular Genetic Testing.

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the responses of 3,265 health professionals who took a continuing education (CE) activity during June 2009 - April 2012 for a comprehensive set of good laboratory practice recommendations for molecular genetic testing.

Design: Participants completed an evaluation questionnaire as part of the CE activity. Responses were summarized to assess the participants' learning outcomes and commitment to applying the knowledge gained.

Participants: Participants included nurses (47%), laboratory professionals (18%), physicians (14%), health educators (4%), public health professionals (2%), office staff (1%), and other health professionals (10%).

Results: Only 32% of all participants correctly answered all 12 open-book knowledge-check questions, ranging from 4 to 42% among the different professional groups (P<0.0001). However, over 80% of all participants expressed confidence in describing the practice recommendations, and 75% indicated the recommendations would improve the quality of their practice. Developing health education materials and local practice guidelines represented the common areas in which participants planned to use the knowledge gained (49% and 18% of all participants, respectively).

Conclusion: Despite perceived self-efficacy in most participants, as high as 68% did not fully use the learning materials provided to answer the knowledge-check questions. These findings suggest the need for improved CE activities that motivate effective learning and address the specific needs of different health professions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信