阻断及其对气候变化的响应。

IF 9.3 1区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Current climate change reports Pub Date : 2018-01-01 Epub Date: 2018-07-20 DOI:10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z
Tim Woollings, David Barriopedro, John Methven, Seok-Woo Son, Olivia Martius, Ben Harvey, Jana Sillmann, Anthony R Lupo, Sonia Seneviratne
{"title":"阻断及其对气候变化的响应。","authors":"Tim Woollings,&nbsp;David Barriopedro,&nbsp;John Methven,&nbsp;Seok-Woo Son,&nbsp;Olivia Martius,&nbsp;Ben Harvey,&nbsp;Jana Sillmann,&nbsp;Anthony R Lupo,&nbsp;Sonia Seneviratne","doi":"10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Atmospheric blocking events represent some of the most high-impact weather patterns in the mid-latitudes, yet they have often been a cause for concern in future climate projections. There has been low confidence in predicted future changes in blocking, despite relatively good agreement between climate models on a decline in blocking. This is due to the lack of a comprehensive theory of blocking and a pervasive underestimation of blocking occurrence by models. This paper reviews the state of knowledge regarding blocking under climate change, with the aim of providing an overview for those working in related fields.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several avenues have been identified by which blocking can be improved in numerical models, though a fully reliable simulation remains elusive (at least, beyond a few days lead time). Models are therefore starting to provide some useful information on how blocking and its impacts may change in the future, although deeper understanding of the processes at play will be needed to increase confidence in model projections. There are still major uncertainties regarding the processes most important to the onset, maintenance and decay of blocking and advances in our understanding of atmospheric dynamics, for example in the role of diabatic processes, continue to inform the modelling and prediction efforts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The term 'blocking' covers a diverse array of synoptic patterns, and hence a bewildering range of indices has been developed to identify events. Results are hence not considered fully trustworthy until they have been found using several different methods. Examples of such robust results are the underestimation of blocking by models, and an overall decline in future occurrence, albeit with a complex regional and seasonal variation. In contrast, hemispheric trends in blocking over the recent historical period are not supported by different methods, and natural variability will likely dominate regional variations over the next few decades.</p>","PeriodicalId":54235,"journal":{"name":"Current climate change reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"287-300"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z","citationCount":"273","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blocking and its Response to Climate Change.\",\"authors\":\"Tim Woollings,&nbsp;David Barriopedro,&nbsp;John Methven,&nbsp;Seok-Woo Son,&nbsp;Olivia Martius,&nbsp;Ben Harvey,&nbsp;Jana Sillmann,&nbsp;Anthony R Lupo,&nbsp;Sonia Seneviratne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Atmospheric blocking events represent some of the most high-impact weather patterns in the mid-latitudes, yet they have often been a cause for concern in future climate projections. There has been low confidence in predicted future changes in blocking, despite relatively good agreement between climate models on a decline in blocking. This is due to the lack of a comprehensive theory of blocking and a pervasive underestimation of blocking occurrence by models. This paper reviews the state of knowledge regarding blocking under climate change, with the aim of providing an overview for those working in related fields.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Several avenues have been identified by which blocking can be improved in numerical models, though a fully reliable simulation remains elusive (at least, beyond a few days lead time). Models are therefore starting to provide some useful information on how blocking and its impacts may change in the future, although deeper understanding of the processes at play will be needed to increase confidence in model projections. There are still major uncertainties regarding the processes most important to the onset, maintenance and decay of blocking and advances in our understanding of atmospheric dynamics, for example in the role of diabatic processes, continue to inform the modelling and prediction efforts.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The term 'blocking' covers a diverse array of synoptic patterns, and hence a bewildering range of indices has been developed to identify events. Results are hence not considered fully trustworthy until they have been found using several different methods. Examples of such robust results are the underestimation of blocking by models, and an overall decline in future occurrence, albeit with a complex regional and seasonal variation. In contrast, hemispheric trends in blocking over the recent historical period are not supported by different methods, and natural variability will likely dominate regional variations over the next few decades.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current climate change reports\",\"volume\":\"4 3\",\"pages\":\"287-300\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z\",\"citationCount\":\"273\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current climate change reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/7/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current climate change reports","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0108-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 273

摘要

审查目的:大气阻塞事件代表了中纬度地区一些影响最大的天气模式,但它们往往是未来气候预测中值得关注的一个原因。尽管气候模式之间关于封冻减少的一致性相对较好,但对封冻未来变化的预测可信度较低。这是由于缺乏一个全面的阻塞理论和普遍低估阻塞发生的模型。本文综述了气候变化条件下关于阻塞的研究现状,旨在为相关领域的研究人员提供一个概述。最近的发现:已经确定了几种方法,通过这些方法可以在数值模型中改进阻塞,尽管完全可靠的模拟仍然难以捉摸(至少,超过几天的提前时间)。因此,模型开始提供一些关于阻塞及其影响在未来可能如何变化的有用信息,尽管需要更深入地了解起作用的过程,以增加对模型预测的信心。对于阻塞的发生、维持和衰减最重要的过程仍然存在重大的不确定性,而我们对大气动力学的理解的进展,例如在绝热过程中的作用,继续为建模和预测工作提供信息。摘要:“阻塞”一词涵盖了各种天气模式,因此开发了一系列令人眼花缭乱的指数来识别事件。因此,在使用几种不同的方法发现结果之前,结果不被认为是完全可信的。这种可靠结果的例子包括模式对阻塞的低估,以及未来发生的总体下降,尽管存在复杂的区域和季节变化。相反,不同的方法无法支持最近历史时期的半球阻塞趋势,在未来几十年里,自然变率可能会主导区域变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Blocking and its Response to Climate Change.

Blocking and its Response to Climate Change.

Blocking and its Response to Climate Change.

Blocking and its Response to Climate Change.

Purpose of review: Atmospheric blocking events represent some of the most high-impact weather patterns in the mid-latitudes, yet they have often been a cause for concern in future climate projections. There has been low confidence in predicted future changes in blocking, despite relatively good agreement between climate models on a decline in blocking. This is due to the lack of a comprehensive theory of blocking and a pervasive underestimation of blocking occurrence by models. This paper reviews the state of knowledge regarding blocking under climate change, with the aim of providing an overview for those working in related fields.

Recent findings: Several avenues have been identified by which blocking can be improved in numerical models, though a fully reliable simulation remains elusive (at least, beyond a few days lead time). Models are therefore starting to provide some useful information on how blocking and its impacts may change in the future, although deeper understanding of the processes at play will be needed to increase confidence in model projections. There are still major uncertainties regarding the processes most important to the onset, maintenance and decay of blocking and advances in our understanding of atmospheric dynamics, for example in the role of diabatic processes, continue to inform the modelling and prediction efforts.

Summary: The term 'blocking' covers a diverse array of synoptic patterns, and hence a bewildering range of indices has been developed to identify events. Results are hence not considered fully trustworthy until they have been found using several different methods. Examples of such robust results are the underestimation of blocking by models, and an overall decline in future occurrence, albeit with a complex regional and seasonal variation. In contrast, hemispheric trends in blocking over the recent historical period are not supported by different methods, and natural variability will likely dominate regional variations over the next few decades.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current climate change reports
Current climate change reports Environmental Science-Global and Planetary Change
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Current Climate Change Reports is dedicated to exploring the most recent research and policy issues in the dynamically evolving field of Climate Change. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics, encompassing Ecological Impacts, Advances in Modeling, Sea Level Projections, Extreme Events, Climate Feedback and Sensitivity, Hydrologic Impact, Effects on Human Health, and Economics and Policy Issues. Expert contributors provide reviews on the latest research, assess the effectiveness of available options, and engage in discussions about special considerations. All articles undergo a thorough peer-review process by specialists in the field to ensure accuracy and objectivity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信