Elisabeth A Gilmore, Lauren Herzer Risi, Elizabeth Tennant, Halvard Buhaug
{"title":"衔接气候变化与冲突的研究与政策。","authors":"Elisabeth A Gilmore, Lauren Herzer Risi, Elizabeth Tennant, Halvard Buhaug","doi":"10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This special issue on \"Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict\" brings together the results of a 2018 workshop organized by the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) and the Wilson Center with six papers that address different aspects of the translation of the research on climate change and conflict to policy and practice. Here, we provide an overview of the workshop and papers to highlight key opportunities and challenges to linking the climate-conflict scholarship with pressing issues in diplomacy, development, and security.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Multiple methods, especially comparative case studies, should be applied to elucidate the more complex mechanisms of the climate-conflict link. This approach may also enhance engagement with the policymakers who draw on examples and narratives. There is also a need for both predictive models that capture contextual factors and policy interactions as well as decision-support tools, such as integrated assessment models, that can be used to test the implications of different theories and models in the literature.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Scholars should engage the policy community to formulate research questions that are more policy relevant, such as the effectiveness of interventions. There is also the need for models and frameworks that help practitioners synthesize the academic results. Practitioners are encouraged to leverage the comparative advantages of academic researchers in new policy and projects to inform data collection and future analysis of effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":54235,"journal":{"name":"Current climate change reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"313-319"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict.\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth A Gilmore, Lauren Herzer Risi, Elizabeth Tennant, Halvard Buhaug\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This special issue on \\\"Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict\\\" brings together the results of a 2018 workshop organized by the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) and the Wilson Center with six papers that address different aspects of the translation of the research on climate change and conflict to policy and practice. Here, we provide an overview of the workshop and papers to highlight key opportunities and challenges to linking the climate-conflict scholarship with pressing issues in diplomacy, development, and security.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Multiple methods, especially comparative case studies, should be applied to elucidate the more complex mechanisms of the climate-conflict link. This approach may also enhance engagement with the policymakers who draw on examples and narratives. There is also a need for both predictive models that capture contextual factors and policy interactions as well as decision-support tools, such as integrated assessment models, that can be used to test the implications of different theories and models in the literature.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Scholars should engage the policy community to formulate research questions that are more policy relevant, such as the effectiveness of interventions. There is also the need for models and frameworks that help practitioners synthesize the academic results. Practitioners are encouraged to leverage the comparative advantages of academic researchers in new policy and projects to inform data collection and future analysis of effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current climate change reports\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"313-319\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current climate change reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/10/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current climate change reports","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-018-0119-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/10/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict.
Purpose of review: This special issue on "Bridging Research and Policy on Climate Change and Conflict" brings together the results of a 2018 workshop organized by the Peace Research Institute, Oslo (PRIO) and the Wilson Center with six papers that address different aspects of the translation of the research on climate change and conflict to policy and practice. Here, we provide an overview of the workshop and papers to highlight key opportunities and challenges to linking the climate-conflict scholarship with pressing issues in diplomacy, development, and security.
Recent findings: Multiple methods, especially comparative case studies, should be applied to elucidate the more complex mechanisms of the climate-conflict link. This approach may also enhance engagement with the policymakers who draw on examples and narratives. There is also a need for both predictive models that capture contextual factors and policy interactions as well as decision-support tools, such as integrated assessment models, that can be used to test the implications of different theories and models in the literature.
Summary: Scholars should engage the policy community to formulate research questions that are more policy relevant, such as the effectiveness of interventions. There is also the need for models and frameworks that help practitioners synthesize the academic results. Practitioners are encouraged to leverage the comparative advantages of academic researchers in new policy and projects to inform data collection and future analysis of effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Current Climate Change Reports is dedicated to exploring the most recent research and policy issues in the dynamically evolving field of Climate Change. The journal covers a broad spectrum of topics, encompassing Ecological Impacts, Advances in Modeling, Sea Level Projections, Extreme Events, Climate Feedback and Sensitivity, Hydrologic Impact, Effects on Human Health, and Economics and Policy Issues. Expert contributors provide reviews on the latest research, assess the effectiveness of available options, and engage in discussions about special considerations. All articles undergo a thorough peer-review process by specialists in the field to ensure accuracy and objectivity.