非阿片类药物辅助治疗成人手术患者的有效性:一项总括性审查方案。

Travis Husser, Jason Marcom, Jordan Mark, John Buonora, Brian Benham
{"title":"非阿片类药物辅助治疗成人手术患者的有效性:一项总括性审查方案。","authors":"Travis Husser,&nbsp;Jason Marcom,&nbsp;Jordan Mark,&nbsp;John Buonora,&nbsp;Brian Benham","doi":"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for decreasing perioperative morphine equivalents and acute postoperative pain scores in adult surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioids are commonly administered during anesthesia to dull the senses, relieve pain and induce sleep. However, there are significant adverse effects associated with intraoperative opioid use. Anesthesia providers can impact the current opioid epidemic by administering non-opioid-centric anesthetic medications. A large-scale evidence-based review is needed to inform a standardized non-opioid pain treatment strategy in the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies of adults 19 years or older who are undergoing surgical procedures and receiving non-opioid oral or intravenous perioperative analgesic medications administered by the anesthesia team. Studies that include patients who receive non-opioid medication as a local infiltrate by the surgical team will be excluded, as will studies with patients who receive regional or neuraxial opioid-sparing techniques. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English after 2007 will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase will be searched, as well as two trial registers and two sources of unpublished reviews. Titles and abstracts will be screened to identify potentially relevant papers. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42019135852.</p>","PeriodicalId":73539,"journal":{"name":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003960","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for adult surgical patients: an umbrella review protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Travis Husser,&nbsp;Jason Marcom,&nbsp;Jordan Mark,&nbsp;John Buonora,&nbsp;Brian Benham\",\"doi\":\"10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for decreasing perioperative morphine equivalents and acute postoperative pain scores in adult surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Opioids are commonly administered during anesthesia to dull the senses, relieve pain and induce sleep. However, there are significant adverse effects associated with intraoperative opioid use. Anesthesia providers can impact the current opioid epidemic by administering non-opioid-centric anesthetic medications. A large-scale evidence-based review is needed to inform a standardized non-opioid pain treatment strategy in the perioperative period.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>This review will consider studies of adults 19 years or older who are undergoing surgical procedures and receiving non-opioid oral or intravenous perioperative analgesic medications administered by the anesthesia team. Studies that include patients who receive non-opioid medication as a local infiltrate by the surgical team will be excluded, as will studies with patients who receive regional or neuraxial opioid-sparing techniques. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English after 2007 will be considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase will be searched, as well as two trial registers and two sources of unpublished reviews. Titles and abstracts will be screened to identify potentially relevant papers. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration number: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42019135852.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003960\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本综述的目的是确定非阿片类药物辅助治疗在降低成人手术患者围手术期吗啡当量和急性术后疼痛评分方面的有效性。简介:阿片类药物通常在麻醉过程中使用,以使感觉迟钝,减轻疼痛和诱导睡眠。然而,术中使用阿片类药物有明显的不良反应。麻醉提供者可以通过管理非阿片类药物中心麻醉药物来影响当前阿片类药物的流行。需要一项大规模的循证评价来为围手术期标准化的非阿片类疼痛治疗策略提供信息。纳入标准:本综述将纳入19岁或以上正在接受外科手术并接受麻醉团队给予的非阿片类口服或静脉围手术期镇痛药物的成年人的研究。包括接受非阿片类药物作为手术小组局部浸润的患者的研究将被排除在外,接受局部或轴向阿片类药物保留技术的患者的研究也将被排除在外。只考虑2007年以后用英文发表的系统综述和荟萃分析。方法:检索MEDLINE、CINAHL和Embase,以及两个试验注册库和两个未发表综述来源。将筛选标题和摘要,以确定可能相关的论文。全文研究的检索、方法学质量评估和数据提取将由两名审稿人独立完成。如果可能的话,将进行荟萃分析,并提交一份建议、评估、发展和评价评分(GRADE)总结。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO CRD42019135852。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for adult surgical patients: an umbrella review protocol.

Objective: The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of non-opioid pharmacological adjuncts for decreasing perioperative morphine equivalents and acute postoperative pain scores in adult surgical patients.

Introduction: Opioids are commonly administered during anesthesia to dull the senses, relieve pain and induce sleep. However, there are significant adverse effects associated with intraoperative opioid use. Anesthesia providers can impact the current opioid epidemic by administering non-opioid-centric anesthetic medications. A large-scale evidence-based review is needed to inform a standardized non-opioid pain treatment strategy in the perioperative period.

Inclusion criteria: This review will consider studies of adults 19 years or older who are undergoing surgical procedures and receiving non-opioid oral or intravenous perioperative analgesic medications administered by the anesthesia team. Studies that include patients who receive non-opioid medication as a local infiltrate by the surgical team will be excluded, as will studies with patients who receive regional or neuraxial opioid-sparing techniques. Only systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English after 2007 will be considered.

Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL and Embase will be searched, as well as two trial registers and two sources of unpublished reviews. Titles and abstracts will be screened to identify potentially relevant papers. Retrieval of full-text studies, assessment of methodological quality and data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers. Meta-analyses will be performed if possible, and a Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Summary of Findings presented.

Systematic review registration number: PROSPERO CRD42019135852.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信