[第一次世界大战中对奥斯曼医疗船的袭击]。

Oya Dağlar Macar
{"title":"[第一次世界大战中对奥斯曼医疗船的袭击]。","authors":"Oya Dağlar Macar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During World War I, hospital ships were used in order to efficiently treat wounded and sick soldiers and to transport them to hospitals on land. With the La Haye Conventions of 1899 and 1907, hospital ships were accepted as immune, and on an international level it was guaranteed that they could serve wounded and sick soldiers throughout the entire war. Although most of the involved states had signed the conventions before the war, after the battles began the -conventions were repeatedly violated and thus rendered ineffectual. Regardless of being painted in the colors specified by the convention and/or carrying the Red Cross or Red Crescent emblem and flag, many ships were bombed, confiscated or damaged with the intent to harass, or they were misused for military purposes that did n6t conform to their actual mission. This article discusses the Entente Powers' attacks on Ottoman hospital ships, examining the protests and warnings of the Ottoman state against them, as recorded in documents kept in the Prime Ministry's Ottoman Archives and the Turkish Red Crescent Archive. The relevant sources show that accusations concerning the attacks on or misuse of hospital ships were mutual. However, both sides generally either dismissed these accusations, or claimed that the incident could not be verified, or indirectly admitted to the attacks being made by mistake. The Ottoman state generally sent its correspondence about the Entente Powers' attacks on its hospital ships with the International Red Cross Committee and the neutral US embassy. The documents under study are particularly important for understanding the reasons behind the breaches to the convention, as well as for investigating the diplomatic language used in.this context. When examining from a human rights perspective the violations concerning the hospital ships and the terminology used in the protests and warning against these violations, these sources carry even greater significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":83561,"journal":{"name":"Yeni tip tarihi arastirmalari = The new history of medicine studies","volume":" 20","pages":"27-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[ATTACKS ON OTTOMAN HOSPITAL SHIPS IN WORLD WAR I].\",\"authors\":\"Oya Dağlar Macar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During World War I, hospital ships were used in order to efficiently treat wounded and sick soldiers and to transport them to hospitals on land. With the La Haye Conventions of 1899 and 1907, hospital ships were accepted as immune, and on an international level it was guaranteed that they could serve wounded and sick soldiers throughout the entire war. Although most of the involved states had signed the conventions before the war, after the battles began the -conventions were repeatedly violated and thus rendered ineffectual. Regardless of being painted in the colors specified by the convention and/or carrying the Red Cross or Red Crescent emblem and flag, many ships were bombed, confiscated or damaged with the intent to harass, or they were misused for military purposes that did n6t conform to their actual mission. This article discusses the Entente Powers' attacks on Ottoman hospital ships, examining the protests and warnings of the Ottoman state against them, as recorded in documents kept in the Prime Ministry's Ottoman Archives and the Turkish Red Crescent Archive. The relevant sources show that accusations concerning the attacks on or misuse of hospital ships were mutual. However, both sides generally either dismissed these accusations, or claimed that the incident could not be verified, or indirectly admitted to the attacks being made by mistake. The Ottoman state generally sent its correspondence about the Entente Powers' attacks on its hospital ships with the International Red Cross Committee and the neutral US embassy. The documents under study are particularly important for understanding the reasons behind the breaches to the convention, as well as for investigating the diplomatic language used in.this context. When examining from a human rights perspective the violations concerning the hospital ships and the terminology used in the protests and warning against these violations, these sources carry even greater significance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":83561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yeni tip tarihi arastirmalari = The new history of medicine studies\",\"volume\":\" 20\",\"pages\":\"27-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yeni tip tarihi arastirmalari = The new history of medicine studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yeni tip tarihi arastirmalari = The new history of medicine studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在第一次世界大战期间,医院船被用来有效地治疗受伤和生病的士兵,并将他们运送到陆地上的医院。根据1899年和1907年的《拉海公约》,医院船被认为是不受影响的,并且在国际层面上保证它们在整个战争期间可以为伤病员提供服务。虽然大多数参战国在战前就签署了公约,但在战争开始后,公约一再遭到违反,因而失效。许多船只不论涂上公约规定的颜色和(或)带有红十字或红新月会徽和旗帜,都遭到轰炸、没收或破坏,目的是骚扰,或被滥用于不符合其实际任务的军事目的。本文讨论了协约国对奥斯曼医院船的袭击,考察了保存在土耳其总理奥斯曼档案馆和土耳其红新月会档案馆的文件中记录的奥斯曼国家对医院船的抗议和警告。有关消息来源表明,关于攻击或滥用医疗船的指控是相互的。然而,双方一般都否认这些指控,或声称该事件无法核实,或间接承认攻击是错误的。关于协约国对其医疗船的袭击,奥斯曼帝国通常会向国际红十字会(International Red Cross Committee)和中立的美国大使馆发送信函。正在研究的文件对于了解违反《公约》背后的原因以及调查在联合国使用的外交语言尤其重要。这个上下文。从人权的角度审视涉及医院船的侵权行为以及抗议和警告这些侵权行为时使用的术语时,这些来源具有更大的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[ATTACKS ON OTTOMAN HOSPITAL SHIPS IN WORLD WAR I].

During World War I, hospital ships were used in order to efficiently treat wounded and sick soldiers and to transport them to hospitals on land. With the La Haye Conventions of 1899 and 1907, hospital ships were accepted as immune, and on an international level it was guaranteed that they could serve wounded and sick soldiers throughout the entire war. Although most of the involved states had signed the conventions before the war, after the battles began the -conventions were repeatedly violated and thus rendered ineffectual. Regardless of being painted in the colors specified by the convention and/or carrying the Red Cross or Red Crescent emblem and flag, many ships were bombed, confiscated or damaged with the intent to harass, or they were misused for military purposes that did n6t conform to their actual mission. This article discusses the Entente Powers' attacks on Ottoman hospital ships, examining the protests and warnings of the Ottoman state against them, as recorded in documents kept in the Prime Ministry's Ottoman Archives and the Turkish Red Crescent Archive. The relevant sources show that accusations concerning the attacks on or misuse of hospital ships were mutual. However, both sides generally either dismissed these accusations, or claimed that the incident could not be verified, or indirectly admitted to the attacks being made by mistake. The Ottoman state generally sent its correspondence about the Entente Powers' attacks on its hospital ships with the International Red Cross Committee and the neutral US embassy. The documents under study are particularly important for understanding the reasons behind the breaches to the convention, as well as for investigating the diplomatic language used in.this context. When examining from a human rights perspective the violations concerning the hospital ships and the terminology used in the protests and warning against these violations, these sources carry even greater significance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信