真实诊断条件下血培养FISH的评价。

European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology Pub Date : 2018-12-12 eCollection Date: 2018-12-23 DOI:10.1556/1886.2018.00024
Annalena Reitz, Sven Poppert, Melanie Rieker, Hagen Frickmann
{"title":"真实诊断条件下血培养FISH的评价。","authors":"Annalena Reitz,&nbsp;Sven Poppert,&nbsp;Melanie Rieker,&nbsp;Hagen Frickmann","doi":"10.1556/1886.2018.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., such as <i>S. aureus, Micrococcus</i> spp., <i>Enterococcus</i> spp., including <i>E. faecium, E. faecalis</i>, and <i>E. gallinarum, Streptococcus</i> spp., like <i>S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae</i>, and <i>S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae</i>, such as <i>Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i> spp.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% <i>(Bacteroides</i> spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":11929,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","volume":"8 4","pages":"135-141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1886.2018.00024","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions.\",\"authors\":\"Annalena Reitz,&nbsp;Sven Poppert,&nbsp;Melanie Rieker,&nbsp;Hagen Frickmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/1886.2018.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised <i>Staphylococcus</i> spp., such as <i>S. aureus, Micrococcus</i> spp., <i>Enterococcus</i> spp., including <i>E. faecium, E. faecalis</i>, and <i>E. gallinarum, Streptococcus</i> spp., like <i>S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae</i>, and <i>S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae</i>, such as <i>Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae</i> and <i>Salmonella</i> spp., <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</i>, and <i>Bacteroides</i> spp.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% <i>(Bacteroides</i> spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology\",\"volume\":\"8 4\",\"pages\":\"135-141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1556/1886.2018.00024\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Microbiology & Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/1886.2018.00024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:该研究评估了先前发表的内部荧光原位杂交(FISH)探针的光谱,结合了它们对孵育血液培养材料的诊断性能。方法:在两年的时间间隔内,用革兰氏染色和FISH染色评估阳性血培养材料。先前描述的和新的FISH探针与葡萄状簇和链中的革兰氏阳性球菌以及革兰氏阴性杆状细菌的面板相结合。被覆盖的病原体包括葡萄球菌,如金黄色葡萄球菌、微球菌、肠球菌,包括粪肠球菌、粪肠球菌和鸡肠球菌;链球菌,如化脓性葡萄球菌、无乳链球菌和肺炎链球菌;肠杆菌科,如大肠杆菌、肺炎克雷伯菌和沙门氏菌;铜绿假单胞菌、嗜麦芽窄养单胞菌和拟杆菌。在21例(2.2%)病例中,FISH反应导致无法解释的结果。除了少数例外情况,测试的FISH探针即使在常规设置中也显示出可接受的测试特性,灵敏度范围从28.6%(拟杆菌属)到100%(6个探针),在所有情况下特异性>95%。结论:如果无法使用血液培养材料的质谱等复杂的快速诊断方法,FISH为资源有限的实验室提供了快速鉴别的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of FISH for Blood Cultures under Diagnostic Real-Life Conditions.

Background: The study assessed a spectrum of previously published in-house fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) probes in a combined approach regarding their diagnostic performance with incubated blood culture materials.

Methods: Within a two-year interval, positive blood culture materials were assessed with Gram and FISH staining. Previously described and new FISH probes were combined to panels for Gram-positive cocci in grape-like clusters and in chains, as well as for Gram-negative rod-shaped bacteria. Covered pathogens comprised Staphylococcus spp., such as S. aureus, Micrococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., including E. faecium, E. faecalis, and E. gallinarum, Streptococcus spp., like S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. pneumoniae, Enterobacteriaceae, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and Bacteroides spp.

Results: A total of 955 blood culture materials were assessed with FISH. In 21 (2.2%) instances, FISH reaction led to non-interpretable results. With few exemptions, the tested FISH probes showed acceptable test characteristics even in the routine setting, with a sensitivity ranging from 28.6% (Bacteroides spp.) to 100% (6 probes) and a specificity of >95% in all instances.

Conclusion: If sophisticated rapid diagnostic methods like mass spectrometry from blood culture materials are not available, FISH provides an option for rapid differentiation for laboratories in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信