选择退出的延续:1984年至2012年的教育、工作和母性。

IF 3.9 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Tanya Byker
{"title":"选择退出的延续:1984年至2012年的教育、工作和母性。","authors":"Tanya Byker","doi":"10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Debate about an increasing trend in highly educated women dropping out of the labor force to care for children-an opt-out revolution-has been considerable. I use unique features of the of Survey of Income and Program Participation-a large nationally representative sample, longitudinal structure, monthly labor-force outcomes, and repeated panels-to study trends in women's birth-related career interruptions over time and across the education spectrum. Methodologically, I use event studies to compare women's monthly labor-force outcomes on the extensive and intensive margins from twenty-four months before to twenty-four months after births in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Rather than an abrupt change in opting out, I find that the pattern of birth-related interruptions has changed surprisingly little over the past thirty years-substantial and sustained interruptions remain common for mothers in all education categories. Rather than a revolution, I find an opt-out continuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":51709,"journal":{"name":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375093/pdf/nihms-1007844.pdf","citationCount":"35","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work, and Motherhood from 1984 to 2012.\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Byker\",\"doi\":\"10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Debate about an increasing trend in highly educated women dropping out of the labor force to care for children-an opt-out revolution-has been considerable. I use unique features of the of Survey of Income and Program Participation-a large nationally representative sample, longitudinal structure, monthly labor-force outcomes, and repeated panels-to study trends in women's birth-related career interruptions over time and across the education spectrum. Methodologically, I use event studies to compare women's monthly labor-force outcomes on the extensive and intensive margins from twenty-four months before to twenty-four months after births in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Rather than an abrupt change in opting out, I find that the pattern of birth-related interruptions has changed surprisingly little over the past thirty years-substantial and sustained interruptions remain common for mothers in all education categories. Rather than a revolution, I find an opt-out continuation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51709,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6375093/pdf/nihms-1007844.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"35\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.02\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2016.2.4.02","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35

摘要

越来越多受过高等教育的女性为了照顾孩子而退出劳动力大军,这是一场“选择退出革命”。我使用收入和项目参与调查的独特特征——一个具有全国代表性的大样本、纵向结构、每月劳动力结果和重复小组——来研究随着时间和教育范围的推移,女性与生育相关的职业中断的趋势。在方法上,我使用事件研究来比较20世纪80年代、90年代和21世纪初女性在产前24个月和产后24个月的粗放型和集约型边际的每月劳动力结果。我发现,在过去的30年里,与生育有关的中断模式并没有发生突然的变化,而是出人意料地几乎没有变化——对所有教育类别的母亲来说,实质性和持续的中断仍然很常见。我发现这不是一场革命,而是一种选择退出的延续。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work, and Motherhood from 1984 to 2012.

The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work, and Motherhood from 1984 to 2012.

The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work, and Motherhood from 1984 to 2012.

The Opt-Out Continuation: Education, Work, and Motherhood from 1984 to 2012.

Debate about an increasing trend in highly educated women dropping out of the labor force to care for children-an opt-out revolution-has been considerable. I use unique features of the of Survey of Income and Program Participation-a large nationally representative sample, longitudinal structure, monthly labor-force outcomes, and repeated panels-to study trends in women's birth-related career interruptions over time and across the education spectrum. Methodologically, I use event studies to compare women's monthly labor-force outcomes on the extensive and intensive margins from twenty-four months before to twenty-four months after births in the 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s. Rather than an abrupt change in opting out, I find that the pattern of birth-related interruptions has changed surprisingly little over the past thirty years-substantial and sustained interruptions remain common for mothers in all education categories. Rather than a revolution, I find an opt-out continuation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences
Rsf-The Russell Sage Journal of the Social Sciences SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信