阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的经口机器人手术的最新进展。

Robotic surgery (Auckland) Pub Date : 2016-05-25 eCollection Date: 2016-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RSRR.S95607
Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam, Wenjie Huang, Ying Hao, Hong Juan Han, Shaun Loh, Song Tar Toh
{"title":"阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征的经口机器人手术的最新进展。","authors":"Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam,&nbsp;Wenjie Huang,&nbsp;Ying Hao,&nbsp;Hong Juan Han,&nbsp;Shaun Loh,&nbsp;Song Tar Toh","doi":"10.2147/RSRR.S95607","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the existing literature on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for tongue base reduction in the management of adult obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from the first literature report of this surgical technique to July 30, 2015 for studies investigating the use of TORS for tongue base reduction in treating adult OSAHS. Our primary outcome measures were Apnea- Hypopnea Index (AHI), lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT), Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), and the rates of surgical cure (AHI<5) and success (50% reduction in AHI accompanied by a postoperative AHI<20). Our secondary outcome measures were the volume of tissue resected and correlation to AHI, polysomnographic parameters, subjective outcomes, and body mass index. Complications of surgery were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen articles were critically evaluated for this research. However, only four case series qualified for statistical analysis of postoperative polysomnographic outcomes and six case series for analysis of postoperative complications. They were case series with a total of 451 adult patients. Pooled analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, and ESS after surgery by 26.83/hour, 5.28% and -8.03, respectively. The average rates of surgical cure and success were 23.8% and 66.7%, respectively. No study reported any deaths or complications related to the use of robotic equipment. The major complication rate was 6.9%, and the minor complication rate was 30.0%. Major complications included major bleeding (2.9%), severe odynophagia with dehydration (3.3%), and oropharyngeal stenosis (0.7%). Minor complications included transient bleeding (0.5%), transient dysphagia (3.8%), and dysgeusia (6.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TORS for tongue base reduction, as a component of multilevel surgery, is an effective treatment option for OSAHS with an acceptable morbidity. This conclusion is based on the analysis of the results of multiple case series. Future studies should entail prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample size for longer follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":92137,"journal":{"name":"Robotic surgery (Auckland)","volume":"3 ","pages":"13-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RSRR.S95607","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State of the art transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Mahalakshmi Rangabashyam,&nbsp;Wenjie Huang,&nbsp;Ying Hao,&nbsp;Hong Juan Han,&nbsp;Shaun Loh,&nbsp;Song Tar Toh\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/RSRR.S95607\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the existing literature on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for tongue base reduction in the management of adult obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from the first literature report of this surgical technique to July 30, 2015 for studies investigating the use of TORS for tongue base reduction in treating adult OSAHS. Our primary outcome measures were Apnea- Hypopnea Index (AHI), lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT), Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), and the rates of surgical cure (AHI<5) and success (50% reduction in AHI accompanied by a postoperative AHI<20). Our secondary outcome measures were the volume of tissue resected and correlation to AHI, polysomnographic parameters, subjective outcomes, and body mass index. Complications of surgery were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen articles were critically evaluated for this research. However, only four case series qualified for statistical analysis of postoperative polysomnographic outcomes and six case series for analysis of postoperative complications. They were case series with a total of 451 adult patients. Pooled analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, and ESS after surgery by 26.83/hour, 5.28% and -8.03, respectively. The average rates of surgical cure and success were 23.8% and 66.7%, respectively. No study reported any deaths or complications related to the use of robotic equipment. The major complication rate was 6.9%, and the minor complication rate was 30.0%. Major complications included major bleeding (2.9%), severe odynophagia with dehydration (3.3%), and oropharyngeal stenosis (0.7%). Minor complications included transient bleeding (0.5%), transient dysphagia (3.8%), and dysgeusia (6.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TORS for tongue base reduction, as a component of multilevel surgery, is an effective treatment option for OSAHS with an acceptable morbidity. This conclusion is based on the analysis of the results of multiple case series. Future studies should entail prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample size for longer follow-up period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":92137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Robotic surgery (Auckland)\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"13-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/RSRR.S95607\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Robotic surgery (Auckland)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S95607\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2016/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Robotic surgery (Auckland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RSRR.S95607","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2016/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

目的:综述经口机器人手术(TORS)在成人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征(OSAHS)治疗中的作用。方法:我们检索PubMed, MEDLINE和Scopus数据库,从该手术技术的第一篇文献报道到2015年7月30日,调查使用TORS治疗成人OSAHS的舌根复位的研究。我们的主要结局指标是呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)、最低血氧饱和度(LSAT)、Epworth嗜睡评分(ESS)和手术治愈率(AHI)。结果:13篇文章被严格评估。然而,只有4个病例系列符合术后多导睡眠图结果的统计分析,6个病例系列符合术后并发症的分析。他们是病例系列,共有451名成年患者。合并分析显示,术后AHI、LSAT和ESS分别改善26.83/小时、5.28%和-8.03,具有统计学意义。手术平均治愈率为23.8%,成功率为66.7%。没有研究报告与使用机器人设备有关的任何死亡或并发症。主要并发症发生率为6.9%,次要并发症发生率为30.0%。主要并发症包括大出血(2.9%)、严重咽痛并脱水(3.3%)和口咽狭窄(0.7%)。轻微并发症包括短暂性出血(0.5%)、短暂性吞咽困难(3.8%)和吞咽困难(6.6%)。结论:托耳行舌底复位作为多节段手术的组成部分,是OSAHS的有效治疗选择,且发病率可接受。这一结论是基于对多个案例序列结果的分析得出的。未来的研究需要前瞻性随机对照试验,样本量更大,随访时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

State of the art transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

State of the art transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

State of the art transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

State of the art transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome.

Objective: To review the existing literature on the role of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for tongue base reduction in the management of adult obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).

Methods: We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases from the first literature report of this surgical technique to July 30, 2015 for studies investigating the use of TORS for tongue base reduction in treating adult OSAHS. Our primary outcome measures were Apnea- Hypopnea Index (AHI), lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT), Epworth Sleepiness Score (ESS), and the rates of surgical cure (AHI<5) and success (50% reduction in AHI accompanied by a postoperative AHI<20). Our secondary outcome measures were the volume of tissue resected and correlation to AHI, polysomnographic parameters, subjective outcomes, and body mass index. Complications of surgery were also analyzed.

Results: Thirteen articles were critically evaluated for this research. However, only four case series qualified for statistical analysis of postoperative polysomnographic outcomes and six case series for analysis of postoperative complications. They were case series with a total of 451 adult patients. Pooled analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in AHI, LSAT, and ESS after surgery by 26.83/hour, 5.28% and -8.03, respectively. The average rates of surgical cure and success were 23.8% and 66.7%, respectively. No study reported any deaths or complications related to the use of robotic equipment. The major complication rate was 6.9%, and the minor complication rate was 30.0%. Major complications included major bleeding (2.9%), severe odynophagia with dehydration (3.3%), and oropharyngeal stenosis (0.7%). Minor complications included transient bleeding (0.5%), transient dysphagia (3.8%), and dysgeusia (6.6%).

Conclusion: TORS for tongue base reduction, as a component of multilevel surgery, is an effective treatment option for OSAHS with an acceptable morbidity. This conclusion is based on the analysis of the results of multiple case series. Future studies should entail prospective randomized controlled trials with larger sample size for longer follow-up period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信