评估加州大学表现技能评估(UPSA)与精神分裂症预后之间的关系:系统回顾和证据综合。

IF 3.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Schizophrenia Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2018-12-27 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/9075174
Shelagh Szabo, Elizabeth Merikle, Greta Lozano-Ortega, Lauren Powell, Thomas Macek, Stephanie Cline
{"title":"评估加州大学表现技能评估(UPSA)与精神分裂症预后之间的关系:系统回顾和证据综合。","authors":"Shelagh Szabo,&nbsp;Elizabeth Merikle,&nbsp;Greta Lozano-Ortega,&nbsp;Lauren Powell,&nbsp;Thomas Macek,&nbsp;Stephanie Cline","doi":"10.1155/2018/9075174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a systematic review of the published literature to evaluate how functional capacity, as measured by the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA), relates to other functional measures and real-world outcomes among individuals with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE® and Embase® databases were searched to identify joint evaluations with UPSA and key functional outcomes (functional scale measures; generic or disease-specific, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]; or real-world outcomes [residential status; employment status]) in patients with schizophrenia. Pearson correlations were estimated between UPSA scores, HRQoL, other functional scale measures, and real-world outcomes, for outcomes described in at least six studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis included 76 studies that provided 73 unique data sets. Quantitative assessment between the Specific Level of Function (SLOF) (n=18) scores and UPSA scores demonstrated a moderate borderline-significant correlation (0.45, <i>p</i>=0.06). Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (n=11) and the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (MSIF) (n=6) scales revealed moderate and small nonsignificant Pearson correlations of -0.34 (<i>p=</i>0.31) and 0.12 (<i>p=</i>0.83), respectively. There was a small borderline-significant correlation between UPSA score and residential status (n=36; 0.31; <i>p=</i>0.08), while no correlation was found between UPSA score and employment status (n=19; 0.04; <i>p</i>=0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SLOF was the most often used functional measure and had the strongest observed correlation with the UPSA. Although knowledge gaps remain, evidence from this review indicates that there is a quantitative relationship between functional capacity and real-world outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia.</p>","PeriodicalId":45388,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/9075174","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Shelagh Szabo,&nbsp;Elizabeth Merikle,&nbsp;Greta Lozano-Ortega,&nbsp;Lauren Powell,&nbsp;Thomas Macek,&nbsp;Stephanie Cline\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/9075174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To perform a systematic review of the published literature to evaluate how functional capacity, as measured by the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA), relates to other functional measures and real-world outcomes among individuals with schizophrenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE® and Embase® databases were searched to identify joint evaluations with UPSA and key functional outcomes (functional scale measures; generic or disease-specific, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]; or real-world outcomes [residential status; employment status]) in patients with schizophrenia. Pearson correlations were estimated between UPSA scores, HRQoL, other functional scale measures, and real-world outcomes, for outcomes described in at least six studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The synthesis included 76 studies that provided 73 unique data sets. Quantitative assessment between the Specific Level of Function (SLOF) (n=18) scores and UPSA scores demonstrated a moderate borderline-significant correlation (0.45, <i>p</i>=0.06). Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (n=11) and the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (MSIF) (n=6) scales revealed moderate and small nonsignificant Pearson correlations of -0.34 (<i>p=</i>0.31) and 0.12 (<i>p=</i>0.83), respectively. There was a small borderline-significant correlation between UPSA score and residential status (n=36; 0.31; <i>p=</i>0.08), while no correlation was found between UPSA score and employment status (n=19; 0.04; <i>p</i>=0.88).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The SLOF was the most often used functional measure and had the strongest observed correlation with the UPSA. Although knowledge gaps remain, evidence from this review indicates that there is a quantitative relationship between functional capacity and real-world outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schizophrenia Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/9075174\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schizophrenia Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9075174\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9075174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:对已发表的文献进行系统回顾,以评估加州大学圣地亚哥分校(UCSD)基于绩效的技能评估(UPSA)所测量的功能能力与精神分裂症患者的其他功能测量和现实世界结果之间的关系。方法:检索MEDLINE®和Embase®数据库,以确定与UPSA和关键功能结局(功能量表测量;一般或疾病特异性、与健康相关的生活质量[HRQoL];或者现实世界的结果[居住状态;精神分裂症患者的就业状况。对于至少六项研究中描述的结果,估计了UPSA评分、HRQoL、其他功能量表测量和现实世界结果之间的Pearson相关性。结果:综合包括76项研究,提供73个独特的数据集。特定功能水平(SLOF)评分(n=18)与UPSA评分之间的定量评估显示中度临界显著相关(0.45,p=0.06)。对整体功能评估(GAF) (n=11)和多维独立功能量表(MSIF) (n=6)量表之间关系的定量分析显示,中度和轻度无显著Pearson相关性分别为-0.34 (p=0.31)和0.12 (p=0.83)。UPSA评分与居住状况之间存在较小的临界显著相关性(n=36;0.31;p=0.08),而UPSA得分与就业状况无相关性(n=19;0.04;p = 0.88)。结论:SLOF是最常用的功能测量,与UPSA的相关性最强。尽管知识差距仍然存在,但本综述的证据表明,精神分裂症患者的功能能力与现实世界的结果之间存在定量关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis.

Objective: To perform a systematic review of the published literature to evaluate how functional capacity, as measured by the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA), relates to other functional measures and real-world outcomes among individuals with schizophrenia.

Methods: The MEDLINE® and Embase® databases were searched to identify joint evaluations with UPSA and key functional outcomes (functional scale measures; generic or disease-specific, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]; or real-world outcomes [residential status; employment status]) in patients with schizophrenia. Pearson correlations were estimated between UPSA scores, HRQoL, other functional scale measures, and real-world outcomes, for outcomes described in at least six studies.

Results: The synthesis included 76 studies that provided 73 unique data sets. Quantitative assessment between the Specific Level of Function (SLOF) (n=18) scores and UPSA scores demonstrated a moderate borderline-significant correlation (0.45, p=0.06). Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (n=11) and the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (MSIF) (n=6) scales revealed moderate and small nonsignificant Pearson correlations of -0.34 (p=0.31) and 0.12 (p=0.83), respectively. There was a small borderline-significant correlation between UPSA score and residential status (n=36; 0.31; p=0.08), while no correlation was found between UPSA score and employment status (n=19; 0.04; p=0.88).

Conclusion: The SLOF was the most often used functional measure and had the strongest observed correlation with the UPSA. Although knowledge gaps remain, evidence from this review indicates that there is a quantitative relationship between functional capacity and real-world outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Schizophrenia Research and Treatment is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to all aspects of schizophrenia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信