【全玻片成像对胃肠道病理初步诊断的验证】。

Akihiko Yoshizawa, Mitsuru Tanaka
{"title":"【全玻片成像对胃肠道病理初步诊断的验证】。","authors":"Akihiko Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Mitsuru Tanaka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology enables the primary diagnosis of histopathological slides. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic concordance between pathological interpretations made using WSI and those made using light microscopy (LM). For this study, 5,704 consecutive surgical pathological cases from a community hospital were included. The specimens were digitized at x40 magnification for biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens or at x20 magnification for other specimens and evaluated by 11 pathologists for diagnosis using WSI. Subsequently, the specimens were signed out using LM by 3 pathologists after 2 weeks. Diagnoses using WSI were then compared with the diagnoses made by using LM. Most (96.8%) of the 5,704 specimens were obtained from the gastrointestinal tract (2,441 biopsy specimens from the esophagogastroduodenum [42.7%], 1,678 endoscopic resection specimens from the colorectum [29.4%], 1,349 biopsy specimens from the colorectum [23.6%], 133 resected specimens from the gallbladder [2.3%], 56 endoscopic resection specimens from the stomach [0.9%], 30 resected specimens from the ap- pendix [0.5%], 14 skin biopsy specimens [0.2%], and 3 other specimens [0.1%]). The overall concordance between the diagnoses made using WSI and those made using LM was 95.1%. The major and minor dis- crepancy rates for WSI were 0.1% and 4.8%, respectively. None of the discordant cases had any clinical or prognostic implications. In conclusion, this study revealed that WSI can be used for primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the studies that clearly proved that diagnosis using WSI is equivalent to diagnosis using LM. [Original].</p>","PeriodicalId":21457,"journal":{"name":"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for Primary Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Pathology].\",\"authors\":\"Akihiko Yoshizawa,&nbsp;Mitsuru Tanaka\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology enables the primary diagnosis of histopathological slides. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic concordance between pathological interpretations made using WSI and those made using light microscopy (LM). For this study, 5,704 consecutive surgical pathological cases from a community hospital were included. The specimens were digitized at x40 magnification for biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens or at x20 magnification for other specimens and evaluated by 11 pathologists for diagnosis using WSI. Subsequently, the specimens were signed out using LM by 3 pathologists after 2 weeks. Diagnoses using WSI were then compared with the diagnoses made by using LM. Most (96.8%) of the 5,704 specimens were obtained from the gastrointestinal tract (2,441 biopsy specimens from the esophagogastroduodenum [42.7%], 1,678 endoscopic resection specimens from the colorectum [29.4%], 1,349 biopsy specimens from the colorectum [23.6%], 133 resected specimens from the gallbladder [2.3%], 56 endoscopic resection specimens from the stomach [0.9%], 30 resected specimens from the ap- pendix [0.5%], 14 skin biopsy specimens [0.2%], and 3 other specimens [0.1%]). The overall concordance between the diagnoses made using WSI and those made using LM was 95.1%. The major and minor dis- crepancy rates for WSI were 0.1% and 4.8%, respectively. None of the discordant cases had any clinical or prognostic implications. In conclusion, this study revealed that WSI can be used for primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the studies that clearly proved that diagnosis using WSI is equivalent to diagnosis using LM. [Original].</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rinsho byori. The Japanese journal of clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全玻片成像(WSI)技术能够对组织病理学玻片进行初步诊断。本研究旨在确定WSI病理解释与光学显微镜病理解释之间的诊断一致性。本研究纳入某社区医院5704例连续手术病理病例。活检和内镜切除标本在x40倍放大镜下数字化,其他标本在x20倍放大镜下数字化,并由11名病理学家评估WSI诊断。2周后由3名病理学家用LM签出标本。然后将WSI诊断与LM诊断进行比较。5704例标本中绝大多数(96.8%)来自胃肠道(食管胃十二指肠活检2441例(42.7%),结肠内镜切除1678例(29.4%),结肠活检1349例(23.6%),胆囊切除133例(2.3%),胃内镜切除56例(0.9%),阑尾切除30例(0.5%),皮肤活检14例(0.2%),其他3例(0.1%))。WSI诊断与LM诊断的总体一致性为95.1%。WSI的主要和次要差异率分别为0.1%和4.8%。没有任何不一致的病例有任何临床或预后意义。综上所述,本研究显示WSI可用于胃肠道活检和内镜切除标本的初步诊断。据我们所知,这是明确证明使用WSI诊断等同于使用LM诊断的研究之一。(最初的)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Validation of Whole Slide Imaging for Primary Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Pathology].

Whole-slide imaging (WSI) technology enables the primary diagnosis of histopathological slides. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic concordance between pathological interpretations made using WSI and those made using light microscopy (LM). For this study, 5,704 consecutive surgical pathological cases from a community hospital were included. The specimens were digitized at x40 magnification for biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens or at x20 magnification for other specimens and evaluated by 11 pathologists for diagnosis using WSI. Subsequently, the specimens were signed out using LM by 3 pathologists after 2 weeks. Diagnoses using WSI were then compared with the diagnoses made by using LM. Most (96.8%) of the 5,704 specimens were obtained from the gastrointestinal tract (2,441 biopsy specimens from the esophagogastroduodenum [42.7%], 1,678 endoscopic resection specimens from the colorectum [29.4%], 1,349 biopsy specimens from the colorectum [23.6%], 133 resected specimens from the gallbladder [2.3%], 56 endoscopic resection specimens from the stomach [0.9%], 30 resected specimens from the ap- pendix [0.5%], 14 skin biopsy specimens [0.2%], and 3 other specimens [0.1%]). The overall concordance between the diagnoses made using WSI and those made using LM was 95.1%. The major and minor dis- crepancy rates for WSI were 0.1% and 4.8%, respectively. None of the discordant cases had any clinical or prognostic implications. In conclusion, this study revealed that WSI can be used for primary diagnosis of gastrointestinal biopsy and endoscopic resection specimens. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the studies that clearly proved that diagnosis using WSI is equivalent to diagnosis using LM. [Original].

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信