不同清洗和包装方法对猪小肠总板数和质量的影响。

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Geunho Kang, Pil-Nam Seong, Hoa Van Ba, Sungsil Moon, Soohyun Cho, Beom-Young Park, Sun-Moon Kang, Hyoung-Joo Ham, Dayae Kim, Kyoungmi Park
{"title":"不同清洗和包装方法对猪小肠总板数和质量的影响。","authors":"Geunho Kang,&nbsp;Pil-Nam Seong,&nbsp;Hoa Van Ba,&nbsp;Sungsil Moon,&nbsp;Soohyun Cho,&nbsp;Beom-Young Park,&nbsp;Sun-Moon Kang,&nbsp;Hyoung-Joo Ham,&nbsp;Dayae Kim,&nbsp;Kyoungmi Park","doi":"10.5851/kosfa.2018.e61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pig small intestine not only is used as food but also for sausage casings production in many countries worldwide. However, it is well recognized that the small intestine is important source of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. The present study aimed at investigating the effects of different washing and packaging methods on the changes of microbial levels and physicochemical characteristics of pig small intestine. After collecting and trimming off of visible fats, the pig small intestine samples were treated with; (i) different packaging methods: aerobic packaging (AP), skin packaging (SP), and vacuum packaging (VP); and (ii) washing with different concentrations of acetic acid. The treated samples were then stored at 4℃ for 1, 4, 7, and 10 d. At 1-d storage, higher pH value was found in the AP-treated samples, however, after 7 to 10 days the samples treated with SP had higher values compared to the ones treated with AP and VP (p<0.05). Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances values were higher in the AP-treated samples than those of the SP- and VP- treated samples at 7-d storage (p<0.05). At 10<sup>th</sup> d, total plate counts (TPC) were higher in the control than in the acetic acid-washed samples (p<0.05). Additionally, the TPC was lower in the SP- and VP-treated samples than the AP-treated samples at 7-d storage (p<0.05). These obtained results suggest that the applications of washing with acetic acid solution and/or SP and VP methods could be an effective way to extend the shelf-life of pig small intestine during cold distribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":17915,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/2c/kosfa-38-6-1253.PMC6335145.pdf","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changes in Total Plate Counts and Quality of Pig Small Intestine by Different Washing and Packaging Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Geunho Kang,&nbsp;Pil-Nam Seong,&nbsp;Hoa Van Ba,&nbsp;Sungsil Moon,&nbsp;Soohyun Cho,&nbsp;Beom-Young Park,&nbsp;Sun-Moon Kang,&nbsp;Hyoung-Joo Ham,&nbsp;Dayae Kim,&nbsp;Kyoungmi Park\",\"doi\":\"10.5851/kosfa.2018.e61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pig small intestine not only is used as food but also for sausage casings production in many countries worldwide. However, it is well recognized that the small intestine is important source of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. The present study aimed at investigating the effects of different washing and packaging methods on the changes of microbial levels and physicochemical characteristics of pig small intestine. After collecting and trimming off of visible fats, the pig small intestine samples were treated with; (i) different packaging methods: aerobic packaging (AP), skin packaging (SP), and vacuum packaging (VP); and (ii) washing with different concentrations of acetic acid. The treated samples were then stored at 4℃ for 1, 4, 7, and 10 d. At 1-d storage, higher pH value was found in the AP-treated samples, however, after 7 to 10 days the samples treated with SP had higher values compared to the ones treated with AP and VP (p<0.05). Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances values were higher in the AP-treated samples than those of the SP- and VP- treated samples at 7-d storage (p<0.05). At 10<sup>th</sup> d, total plate counts (TPC) were higher in the control than in the acetic acid-washed samples (p<0.05). Additionally, the TPC was lower in the SP- and VP-treated samples than the AP-treated samples at 7-d storage (p<0.05). These obtained results suggest that the applications of washing with acetic acid solution and/or SP and VP methods could be an effective way to extend the shelf-life of pig small intestine during cold distribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/88/2c/kosfa-38-6-1253.PMC6335145.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2018.e61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

猪小肠不仅被用作食品,而且在世界许多国家也被用于生产肠衣。然而,众所周知,小肠是腐败和致病菌的重要来源。本研究旨在研究不同清洗和包装方法对猪小肠微生物水平和理化特性变化的影响。在收集并修剪掉可见脂肪后,对猪小肠样品进行处理;(i) 不同的包装方式:有氧包装(AP)、皮肤包装(SP)和真空包装(VP);和(ii)用不同浓度的乙酸洗涤。然后将处理后的样品在4℃下储存1、4、7和10d。在储存1d时,AP处理的样品的pH值更高。然而,在7-10天后,用SP处理的样品与用AP和VP处理的样品相比具有更高的pH值(pth d,对照中的总平板计数(TPC)高于乙酸洗涤的样品(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changes in Total Plate Counts and Quality of Pig Small Intestine by Different Washing and Packaging Methods.

Pig small intestine not only is used as food but also for sausage casings production in many countries worldwide. However, it is well recognized that the small intestine is important source of spoilage and pathogenic bacteria. The present study aimed at investigating the effects of different washing and packaging methods on the changes of microbial levels and physicochemical characteristics of pig small intestine. After collecting and trimming off of visible fats, the pig small intestine samples were treated with; (i) different packaging methods: aerobic packaging (AP), skin packaging (SP), and vacuum packaging (VP); and (ii) washing with different concentrations of acetic acid. The treated samples were then stored at 4℃ for 1, 4, 7, and 10 d. At 1-d storage, higher pH value was found in the AP-treated samples, however, after 7 to 10 days the samples treated with SP had higher values compared to the ones treated with AP and VP (p<0.05). Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances values were higher in the AP-treated samples than those of the SP- and VP- treated samples at 7-d storage (p<0.05). At 10th d, total plate counts (TPC) were higher in the control than in the acetic acid-washed samples (p<0.05). Additionally, the TPC was lower in the SP- and VP-treated samples than the AP-treated samples at 7-d storage (p<0.05). These obtained results suggest that the applications of washing with acetic acid solution and/or SP and VP methods could be an effective way to extend the shelf-life of pig small intestine during cold distribution.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.22
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信