Chun-Sheng Song, Jia-You Zhao, Jun Guo, De-Gui Chang, Lei Chen, Rui Zhang, Fu Wang
{"title":"【龙必舒胶囊联合甲磺酸多沙唑嗪片治疗良性前列腺增生】。","authors":"Chun-Sheng Song, Jia-You Zhao, Jun Guo, De-Gui Chang, Lei Chen, Rui Zhang, Fu Wang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of Longbishu Capsule (LBS) com- bined Doxazosin Mesylate Tablet (DMT) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Total- ly 360 BPH with Shen deficiency blood stasis syndrome (SDBSS) were randomly assigned to group A, B, and C, 120 cases in each group. Patients in Group A took LBS placebos combined DMT. Those in Group B took LBS combined DMT. Those in Group C took LBS combined DMT placebos. The dose for LBS was 3 pills each time, 0. 3 g/pill, twice per day. The dose of DMT was 1 tablet each time, 2 mg/tablet, once per day. The therapeutic course for all was 12 months. A total of 113 cases in Group A were recruited in FAS analysis, 115 cases in Group B, and 116 cases in Group C. Main efficacy indicators [International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) , maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) , Quality of Life (QOL) ] , and sec- ondary efficacy indicators [postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) and prostate volume (PV) , symptoms scores of Chinese medicine (CM) I were observed in each group. The efficacy was analyzed in the three groups by taking average age of subjects (66 years) as the hierarchy factor (50 ≤age ≤66 and <66 <age ≤80). Results Compared with before treatment in the same group, IPSS, QOL score, and symptoms scores of CM all decreased, and Qmax increased in Group A, B, and C after treatment; PVR decreased in Group B and C (all P <0. 01). There was no statistical difference in main efficacy indicators or second- ary efficacy indicators among post-treatment groups (P >0. 05). There was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy among post-treatment groups (P >0. 05). The efficacy in subjects more than 66 years old of Group B was superior to that of Group A and C with statistical difference (P <0. 05). Conclusions LBS, DMT, or LBS combined DMT was safe and effective for treating BPH. LBS combined DMT was suit- able for patients complicated with abnormal PVR or aged over 66 years.</p>","PeriodicalId":10107,"journal":{"name":"中国中西医结合杂志","volume":"36 12","pages":"1465-1469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Longbishu Capsule Combined Doxazosin Mesylate Tablet].\",\"authors\":\"Chun-Sheng Song, Jia-You Zhao, Jun Guo, De-Gui Chang, Lei Chen, Rui Zhang, Fu Wang\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of Longbishu Capsule (LBS) com- bined Doxazosin Mesylate Tablet (DMT) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Total- ly 360 BPH with Shen deficiency blood stasis syndrome (SDBSS) were randomly assigned to group A, B, and C, 120 cases in each group. Patients in Group A took LBS placebos combined DMT. Those in Group B took LBS combined DMT. Those in Group C took LBS combined DMT placebos. The dose for LBS was 3 pills each time, 0. 3 g/pill, twice per day. The dose of DMT was 1 tablet each time, 2 mg/tablet, once per day. The therapeutic course for all was 12 months. A total of 113 cases in Group A were recruited in FAS analysis, 115 cases in Group B, and 116 cases in Group C. Main efficacy indicators [International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) , maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) , Quality of Life (QOL) ] , and sec- ondary efficacy indicators [postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) and prostate volume (PV) , symptoms scores of Chinese medicine (CM) I were observed in each group. The efficacy was analyzed in the three groups by taking average age of subjects (66 years) as the hierarchy factor (50 ≤age ≤66 and <66 <age ≤80). Results Compared with before treatment in the same group, IPSS, QOL score, and symptoms scores of CM all decreased, and Qmax increased in Group A, B, and C after treatment; PVR decreased in Group B and C (all P <0. 01). There was no statistical difference in main efficacy indicators or second- ary efficacy indicators among post-treatment groups (P >0. 05). There was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy among post-treatment groups (P >0. 05). The efficacy in subjects more than 66 years old of Group B was superior to that of Group A and C with statistical difference (P <0. 05). Conclusions LBS, DMT, or LBS combined DMT was safe and effective for treating BPH. LBS combined DMT was suit- able for patients complicated with abnormal PVR or aged over 66 years.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国中西医结合杂志\",\"volume\":\"36 12\",\"pages\":\"1465-1469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国中西医结合杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国中西医结合杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Longbishu Capsule Combined Doxazosin Mesylate Tablet].
Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of Longbishu Capsule (LBS) com- bined Doxazosin Mesylate Tablet (DMT) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods Total- ly 360 BPH with Shen deficiency blood stasis syndrome (SDBSS) were randomly assigned to group A, B, and C, 120 cases in each group. Patients in Group A took LBS placebos combined DMT. Those in Group B took LBS combined DMT. Those in Group C took LBS combined DMT placebos. The dose for LBS was 3 pills each time, 0. 3 g/pill, twice per day. The dose of DMT was 1 tablet each time, 2 mg/tablet, once per day. The therapeutic course for all was 12 months. A total of 113 cases in Group A were recruited in FAS analysis, 115 cases in Group B, and 116 cases in Group C. Main efficacy indicators [International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) , maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) , Quality of Life (QOL) ] , and sec- ondary efficacy indicators [postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) and prostate volume (PV) , symptoms scores of Chinese medicine (CM) I were observed in each group. The efficacy was analyzed in the three groups by taking average age of subjects (66 years) as the hierarchy factor (50 ≤age ≤66 and <66 0. 05). There was no statistical difference in clinical efficacy among post-treatment groups (P >0. 05). The efficacy in subjects more than 66 years old of Group B was superior to that of Group A and C with statistical difference (P <0. 05). Conclusions LBS, DMT, or LBS combined DMT was safe and effective for treating BPH. LBS combined DMT was suit- able for patients complicated with abnormal PVR or aged over 66 years.