细胞培养室中的化学浓度(C5) .浓度定义

ALTEX Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.14573/altex.1901031
Jaffar Kisitu, Susanne Hougaard Bennekou, Marcel Leist
{"title":"细胞培养室中的化学浓度(C5) .浓度定义","authors":"Jaffar Kisitu,&nbsp;Susanne Hougaard Bennekou,&nbsp;Marcel Leist","doi":"10.14573/altex.1901031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Some laboratory issues are taken for granted as they seem to be simple and not worth much thought. This applies to \"concentrations of a chemical tested for bioactivity/toxicity\". Can there be any issue about weighing a compound, diluting it in culture medium and calculating the final mass (or particle number)-to-volume ratio? We discuss here some basic concepts about concentrations and their units, addressing also differences between \"dose\" and \"concentration\". The problem of calculated nominal concentrations not necessarily corresponding to local concentrations (relevant for biological effects of a chemical) is highlighted. We present and exemplify different concentration measures, for instance those relying on weight, volume, or particle number of the test compound in a given volume; we also include normalizations to the mass, protein content, or cell number of the reference system. Interconversion is discussed as a major, often unresolved, issue. We put this into the context of the overall objective of defining concentrations, i.e., the determination of threshold values of bioactivity (e.g., an EC50). As standard approach for data display, the negative decadic logarithm of the molar concentrations (-log(M)) is recommended here, but arguments are also presented for exceptions from such a rule. These basic definitions are meant as a foundation for follow-up articles that examine the concepts of nominal, free, and intracellular concentrations to provide guidance on how to relate in vitro concentrations to in vivo doses by in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in order to advance the use of new approach methods (NAM) in regulatory decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":520550,"journal":{"name":"ALTEX","volume":" ","pages":"154-160"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical concentrations in cell culture compartments (C5) - concentration definitions.\",\"authors\":\"Jaffar Kisitu,&nbsp;Susanne Hougaard Bennekou,&nbsp;Marcel Leist\",\"doi\":\"10.14573/altex.1901031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Some laboratory issues are taken for granted as they seem to be simple and not worth much thought. This applies to \\\"concentrations of a chemical tested for bioactivity/toxicity\\\". Can there be any issue about weighing a compound, diluting it in culture medium and calculating the final mass (or particle number)-to-volume ratio? We discuss here some basic concepts about concentrations and their units, addressing also differences between \\\"dose\\\" and \\\"concentration\\\". The problem of calculated nominal concentrations not necessarily corresponding to local concentrations (relevant for biological effects of a chemical) is highlighted. We present and exemplify different concentration measures, for instance those relying on weight, volume, or particle number of the test compound in a given volume; we also include normalizations to the mass, protein content, or cell number of the reference system. Interconversion is discussed as a major, often unresolved, issue. We put this into the context of the overall objective of defining concentrations, i.e., the determination of threshold values of bioactivity (e.g., an EC50). As standard approach for data display, the negative decadic logarithm of the molar concentrations (-log(M)) is recommended here, but arguments are also presented for exceptions from such a rule. These basic definitions are meant as a foundation for follow-up articles that examine the concepts of nominal, free, and intracellular concentrations to provide guidance on how to relate in vitro concentrations to in vivo doses by in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in order to advance the use of new approach methods (NAM) in regulatory decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ALTEX\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"154-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ALTEX\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1901031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ALTEX","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.1901031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

一些实验室问题被认为是理所当然的,因为它们似乎很简单,不值得多想。这适用于“测试生物活性/毒性的化学品浓度”。称量一种化合物,在培养基中稀释,计算最终质量(或粒子数)与体积比会有问题吗?我们在这里讨论有关浓度及其单位的一些基本概念,并讨论“剂量”和“浓度”之间的区别。强调了计算的名义浓度不一定与当地浓度(与化学品的生物效应有关)相对应的问题。我们提出并举例说明了不同的浓度测量方法,例如那些依赖于给定体积中测试化合物的重量、体积或颗粒数的方法;我们还包括对参照系的质量、蛋白质含量或细胞数的归一化。相互转换是一个主要的、经常未解决的问题。我们将其置于定义浓度的总体目标的背景下,即确定生物活性的阈值(例如EC50)。作为数据显示的标准方法,这里推荐使用摩尔浓度的负十进对数(-log(M)),但也提出了该规则的例外情况。这些基本定义是后续文章的基础,这些文章将研究名义浓度、游离浓度和细胞内浓度的概念,为如何通过体外到体内外推(IVIVE)将体外浓度与体内剂量联系起来提供指导,从而促进在监管决策中使用新方法(NAM)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemical concentrations in cell culture compartments (C5) - concentration definitions.

Some laboratory issues are taken for granted as they seem to be simple and not worth much thought. This applies to "concentrations of a chemical tested for bioactivity/toxicity". Can there be any issue about weighing a compound, diluting it in culture medium and calculating the final mass (or particle number)-to-volume ratio? We discuss here some basic concepts about concentrations and their units, addressing also differences between "dose" and "concentration". The problem of calculated nominal concentrations not necessarily corresponding to local concentrations (relevant for biological effects of a chemical) is highlighted. We present and exemplify different concentration measures, for instance those relying on weight, volume, or particle number of the test compound in a given volume; we also include normalizations to the mass, protein content, or cell number of the reference system. Interconversion is discussed as a major, often unresolved, issue. We put this into the context of the overall objective of defining concentrations, i.e., the determination of threshold values of bioactivity (e.g., an EC50). As standard approach for data display, the negative decadic logarithm of the molar concentrations (-log(M)) is recommended here, but arguments are also presented for exceptions from such a rule. These basic definitions are meant as a foundation for follow-up articles that examine the concepts of nominal, free, and intracellular concentrations to provide guidance on how to relate in vitro concentrations to in vivo doses by in vitro-to-in vivo extrapolation (IVIVE) in order to advance the use of new approach methods (NAM) in regulatory decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信