塔跳评价作为上肢损伤的指标。

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2018-09-06 eCollection Date: 2018-07-01 DOI:10.1055/a-0655-7345
Jeff W Barfield, Gretchen D Oliver
{"title":"塔跳评价作为上肢损伤的指标。","authors":"Jeff W Barfield,&nbsp;Gretchen D Oliver","doi":"10.1055/a-0655-7345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine if tuck jumps can be used as a dynamic movement assessment to ascertain a previous history of upper extremity injury in an overhead throwing sport. Seventy-one youth baseball and softball athletes (28 baseball/43 softball; 12.41±2.22 yrs.; 161.98±13.65 cm; 59.17 ± 14.90 kg) were recruited to participate and were placed in either the previous injury (N=18) or no previous injury (N=53) groups. Kinematic data were collected from jumps 4 through 8 during a trial of 10 tuck jumps performed at 100 Hz using an electromagnetic tracking system (trakSTAR <sup>TM</sup> , Ascension Technologies, Inc., Burlington, VT, USA) synced with the MotionMonitor <sup>®</sup> (Innovative Sports Training, Chicago, IL, USA). A logistic regression showed no significance in trunk flexion or upper leg elevation in the ability to determine upper extremity injury ( <i>χ</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> (1, <i>N</i> =71)=3.55, <i>p</i> =0.315). In conclusion, examining only trunk flexion and upper leg elevation during the tuck jump assessment (TJA) is not enough for clinicians to recognize previous upper extremity injury. Even though the body behaves as a kinetic chain, simplifying the dynamic movement assessment while not specifying the type of upper extremity injury is not favorable for the clinician to identify previous injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"2 4","pages":"E113-E116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0655-7345","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tuck Jump Assessment as an Indicator for Upper Extremity Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Jeff W Barfield,&nbsp;Gretchen D Oliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-0655-7345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to determine if tuck jumps can be used as a dynamic movement assessment to ascertain a previous history of upper extremity injury in an overhead throwing sport. Seventy-one youth baseball and softball athletes (28 baseball/43 softball; 12.41±2.22 yrs.; 161.98±13.65 cm; 59.17 ± 14.90 kg) were recruited to participate and were placed in either the previous injury (N=18) or no previous injury (N=53) groups. Kinematic data were collected from jumps 4 through 8 during a trial of 10 tuck jumps performed at 100 Hz using an electromagnetic tracking system (trakSTAR <sup>TM</sup> , Ascension Technologies, Inc., Burlington, VT, USA) synced with the MotionMonitor <sup>®</sup> (Innovative Sports Training, Chicago, IL, USA). A logistic regression showed no significance in trunk flexion or upper leg elevation in the ability to determine upper extremity injury ( <i>χ</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup> (1, <i>N</i> =71)=3.55, <i>p</i> =0.315). In conclusion, examining only trunk flexion and upper leg elevation during the tuck jump assessment (TJA) is not enough for clinicians to recognize previous upper extremity injury. Even though the body behaves as a kinetic chain, simplifying the dynamic movement assessment while not specifying the type of upper extremity injury is not favorable for the clinician to identify previous injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports medicine international open\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"E113-E116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1055/a-0655-7345\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports medicine international open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0655-7345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0655-7345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是确定是否可以用塔克跳作为一个动态运动评估,以确定上肢损伤的历史在一个头顶投掷运动。青少年棒垒球运动员71名(棒球28名/垒球43名;12.41±2.22岁。161.98±13.65厘米;(59.17±14.90 kg),分为既往损伤组(N=18)和无既往损伤组(N=53)。使用电磁跟踪系统(trakSTAR TM, Ascension Technologies, Inc., Burlington, VT, USA)与MotionMonitor®(Innovative Sports Training, Chicago, IL, USA)同步,在100 Hz下进行10次塔克跳跃试验期间,从第4跳到第8跳收集运动学数据。logistic回归分析显示,躯干屈曲或上肢抬高对判断上肢损伤的能力无显著影响(χ 2 (1, N =71)=3.55, p =0.315)。总之,仅检查躯干屈曲和上肢抬高在跳跃评估(TJA)是不够的,临床医生识别以前的上肢损伤。尽管身体表现为一条运动链,但在不明确上肢损伤类型的情况下简化动态运动评估,不利于临床医生识别既往损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tuck Jump Assessment as an Indicator for Upper Extremity Injury.

The purpose of this study was to determine if tuck jumps can be used as a dynamic movement assessment to ascertain a previous history of upper extremity injury in an overhead throwing sport. Seventy-one youth baseball and softball athletes (28 baseball/43 softball; 12.41±2.22 yrs.; 161.98±13.65 cm; 59.17 ± 14.90 kg) were recruited to participate and were placed in either the previous injury (N=18) or no previous injury (N=53) groups. Kinematic data were collected from jumps 4 through 8 during a trial of 10 tuck jumps performed at 100 Hz using an electromagnetic tracking system (trakSTAR TM , Ascension Technologies, Inc., Burlington, VT, USA) synced with the MotionMonitor ® (Innovative Sports Training, Chicago, IL, USA). A logistic regression showed no significance in trunk flexion or upper leg elevation in the ability to determine upper extremity injury ( χ 2 (1, N =71)=3.55, p =0.315). In conclusion, examining only trunk flexion and upper leg elevation during the tuck jump assessment (TJA) is not enough for clinicians to recognize previous upper extremity injury. Even though the body behaves as a kinetic chain, simplifying the dynamic movement assessment while not specifying the type of upper extremity injury is not favorable for the clinician to identify previous injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信