BCL-2表达有助于Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分的免疫组化预测。

Q2 Medicine
BMC Clinical Pathology Pub Date : 2018-12-18 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3
Mark D Zarella, Rebecca C Heintzelman, Nikolay K Popnikolov, Fernando U Garcia
{"title":"BCL-2表达有助于Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分的免疫组化预测。","authors":"Mark D Zarella,&nbsp;Rebecca C Heintzelman,&nbsp;Nikolay K Popnikolov,&nbsp;Fernando U Garcia","doi":"10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of molecular techniques to estimate the risk of breast cancer recurrence has been a significant addition to the suite of tools available to pathologists and breast oncologists. It has previously been shown that immunohistochemistry can provide a surrogate measure of tumor recurrence risk, effectively providing a less expensive and more rapid estimate of risk without the need for send-out. However, concordance between gene expression-based and immunohistochemistry-based approaches has been modest, making it difficult to determine when one approach can serve as an adequate substitute for the other. We investigated whether immunohistochemistry-based methods can be augmented to provide a useful therapeutic indicator of risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied whether the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted from routinely acquired immunohistochemistry of breast tumor histology. We examined the effects of two modifications to conventional scoring measures based on ER, PR, Ki-67, and Her2 expression. First, we tested a mathematical transformation that produces a more diagnostic-relevant representation of the staining attributes of these markers. Second, we considered the expression of BCL-2, a complex involved in regulating apoptosis, as an additional prognostic marker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the mathematical transformation improved concordance rates over the conventional scoring model. By establishing a measure of prediction certainty, we discovered that the difference in concordance between methods was even greater among the most certain cases in the sample, demonstrating the utility of an accompanying measure of prediction certainty. Including BCL-2 expression in the scoring model increased the number of breast cancer cases in the cohort that were considered high certainty, effectively expanding the applicability of this technique to a greater proportion of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate an improvement in concordance between immunohistochemistry-based and gene expression-based methods to predict breast cancer recurrence risk following two simple modifications to the conventional scoring model.</p>","PeriodicalId":35804,"journal":{"name":"BMC Clinical Pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BCL-2 expression aids in the immunohistochemical prediction of the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score.\",\"authors\":\"Mark D Zarella,&nbsp;Rebecca C Heintzelman,&nbsp;Nikolay K Popnikolov,&nbsp;Fernando U Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of molecular techniques to estimate the risk of breast cancer recurrence has been a significant addition to the suite of tools available to pathologists and breast oncologists. It has previously been shown that immunohistochemistry can provide a surrogate measure of tumor recurrence risk, effectively providing a less expensive and more rapid estimate of risk without the need for send-out. However, concordance between gene expression-based and immunohistochemistry-based approaches has been modest, making it difficult to determine when one approach can serve as an adequate substitute for the other. We investigated whether immunohistochemistry-based methods can be augmented to provide a useful therapeutic indicator of risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied whether the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted from routinely acquired immunohistochemistry of breast tumor histology. We examined the effects of two modifications to conventional scoring measures based on ER, PR, Ki-67, and Her2 expression. First, we tested a mathematical transformation that produces a more diagnostic-relevant representation of the staining attributes of these markers. Second, we considered the expression of BCL-2, a complex involved in regulating apoptosis, as an additional prognostic marker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the mathematical transformation improved concordance rates over the conventional scoring model. By establishing a measure of prediction certainty, we discovered that the difference in concordance between methods was even greater among the most certain cases in the sample, demonstrating the utility of an accompanying measure of prediction certainty. Including BCL-2 expression in the scoring model increased the number of breast cancer cases in the cohort that were considered high certainty, effectively expanding the applicability of this technique to a greater proportion of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results demonstrate an improvement in concordance between immunohistochemistry-based and gene expression-based methods to predict breast cancer recurrence risk following two simple modifications to the conventional scoring model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35804,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12907-018-0082-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:分子技术的发展估计乳腺癌复发的风险已经成为病理学家和乳腺肿瘤学家可用的工具套件的重要补充。以前的研究表明,免疫组织化学可以提供肿瘤复发风险的替代测量,有效地提供了一种更便宜、更快速的风险评估,而不需要送出。然而,基于基因表达的方法和基于免疫组织化学的方法之间的一致性并不高,因此很难确定何时一种方法可以作为另一种方法的适当替代品。我们研究了基于免疫组织化学的方法是否可以增强,以提供有用的治疗风险指标。方法:我们研究Oncotype DX乳腺癌复发评分是否可以通过常规获得性乳腺癌组织免疫组化来预测。我们研究了基于ER、PR、Ki-67和Her2表达的传统评分方法的两种修改的影响。首先,我们测试了一种数学转换,该转换产生了这些标记的染色属性的更具诊断相关性的表示。其次,我们考虑了BCL-2的表达,一种参与调节细胞凋亡的复合物,作为一个额外的预后标志物。结果:我们发现数学转换比传统的评分模型提高了一致性率。通过建立预测确定性的度量,我们发现在样本中最确定的情况下,方法之间的一致性差异甚至更大,这证明了伴随的预测确定性度量的效用。在评分模型中加入BCL-2表达增加了被认为是高确定性的队列中乳腺癌病例的数量,有效地扩大了该技术在更大比例患者中的适用性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在对传统评分模型进行两次简单修改后,基于免疫组织化学和基于基因表达的方法预测乳腺癌复发风险的一致性得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

BCL-2 expression aids in the immunohistochemical prediction of the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score.

BCL-2 expression aids in the immunohistochemical prediction of the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score.

BCL-2 expression aids in the immunohistochemical prediction of the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score.

BCL-2 expression aids in the immunohistochemical prediction of the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score.

Background: The development of molecular techniques to estimate the risk of breast cancer recurrence has been a significant addition to the suite of tools available to pathologists and breast oncologists. It has previously been shown that immunohistochemistry can provide a surrogate measure of tumor recurrence risk, effectively providing a less expensive and more rapid estimate of risk without the need for send-out. However, concordance between gene expression-based and immunohistochemistry-based approaches has been modest, making it difficult to determine when one approach can serve as an adequate substitute for the other. We investigated whether immunohistochemistry-based methods can be augmented to provide a useful therapeutic indicator of risk.

Methods: We studied whether the Oncotype DX breast cancer recurrence score can be predicted from routinely acquired immunohistochemistry of breast tumor histology. We examined the effects of two modifications to conventional scoring measures based on ER, PR, Ki-67, and Her2 expression. First, we tested a mathematical transformation that produces a more diagnostic-relevant representation of the staining attributes of these markers. Second, we considered the expression of BCL-2, a complex involved in regulating apoptosis, as an additional prognostic marker.

Results: We found that the mathematical transformation improved concordance rates over the conventional scoring model. By establishing a measure of prediction certainty, we discovered that the difference in concordance between methods was even greater among the most certain cases in the sample, demonstrating the utility of an accompanying measure of prediction certainty. Including BCL-2 expression in the scoring model increased the number of breast cancer cases in the cohort that were considered high certainty, effectively expanding the applicability of this technique to a greater proportion of patients.

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate an improvement in concordance between immunohistochemistry-based and gene expression-based methods to predict breast cancer recurrence risk following two simple modifications to the conventional scoring model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Clinical Pathology
BMC Clinical Pathology Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Clinical Pathology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of histopathology, haematology, clinical biochemistry, and medical microbiology (including virology, parasitology, and infection control). BMC Clinical Pathology (ISSN 1472-6890) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信