Eleni Poptsi, Ioulietta Lazarou, Nefeli Markou, Maria Vassiloglou, Evdokia Nikolaidou, Alexandra Diamantidou, Vassiliki Siatra, Elina Karathanassi, Anastasios Karakostas, Fotini Kounti Zafeiropoulou, Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos, Magda Tsolaki
{"title":"在轻度认知障碍患者中开展语言训练的单盲随机对照对比试验。","authors":"Eleni Poptsi, Ioulietta Lazarou, Nefeli Markou, Maria Vassiloglou, Evdokia Nikolaidou, Alexandra Diamantidou, Vassiliki Siatra, Elina Karathanassi, Anastasios Karakostas, Fotini Kounti Zafeiropoulou, Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos, Magda Tsolaki","doi":"10.1177/1533317518813554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cognitive training is effective for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), it is not clear which format is more effective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the same language programs when carried out via computer, paper/pencil and orally in people with MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one participants with MCI were randomly classified in 3 experimental and 2 control groups. The experimental groups attended 48 sessions of language training for 6 months. The control groups attended either unstructured sessions or they were on waiting list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed measures analysis of variance, at the follow-up, showed a significant cognitive abilities improvement among the experimental versus control groups. At the end of the language training, the 3 groups presented improvement in cognitive abilities and daily function, while the control groups remained at the same performance level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 3 cognitive language training methods were equally significantly effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":50816,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","volume":"34 3","pages":"176-187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852481/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial With Language Training in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment.\",\"authors\":\"Eleni Poptsi, Ioulietta Lazarou, Nefeli Markou, Maria Vassiloglou, Evdokia Nikolaidou, Alexandra Diamantidou, Vassiliki Siatra, Elina Karathanassi, Anastasios Karakostas, Fotini Kounti Zafeiropoulou, Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos, Magda Tsolaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1533317518813554\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although cognitive training is effective for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), it is not clear which format is more effective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of the same language programs when carried out via computer, paper/pencil and orally in people with MCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy-one participants with MCI were randomly classified in 3 experimental and 2 control groups. The experimental groups attended 48 sessions of language training for 6 months. The control groups attended either unstructured sessions or they were on waiting list.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mixed measures analysis of variance, at the follow-up, showed a significant cognitive abilities improvement among the experimental versus control groups. At the end of the language training, the 3 groups presented improvement in cognitive abilities and daily function, while the control groups remained at the same performance level.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All 3 cognitive language training methods were equally significantly effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"176-187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10852481/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317518813554\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/12/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementias","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317518813554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial With Language Training in People With Mild Cognitive Impairment.
Background: Although cognitive training is effective for people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), it is not clear which format is more effective.
Objective: To compare the effectiveness of the same language programs when carried out via computer, paper/pencil and orally in people with MCI.
Methods: Seventy-one participants with MCI were randomly classified in 3 experimental and 2 control groups. The experimental groups attended 48 sessions of language training for 6 months. The control groups attended either unstructured sessions or they were on waiting list.
Results: Mixed measures analysis of variance, at the follow-up, showed a significant cognitive abilities improvement among the experimental versus control groups. At the end of the language training, the 3 groups presented improvement in cognitive abilities and daily function, while the control groups remained at the same performance level.
Conclusion: All 3 cognitive language training methods were equally significantly effective.
期刊介绍：
American Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease and other Dementias® (AJADD) is for professionals on the frontlines of Alzheimer''s care, dementia, and clinical depression--especially physicians, nurses, psychiatrists, administrators, and other healthcare specialists who manage patients with dementias and their families. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
