磺胺氯吡嗪、盐酸氨丙氨铵、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和双唑脲防治兔球虫病的疗效观察。

Journal of veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2018-10-23 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/5402469
Kennedy O Ogolla, Peter K Gathumbi, Robert M Waruiru, Paul O Okumu, Joyce Chebet, Philip M Kitala
{"title":"磺胺氯吡嗪、盐酸氨丙氨铵、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑和双唑脲防治兔球虫病的疗效观察。","authors":"Kennedy O Ogolla,&nbsp;Peter K Gathumbi,&nbsp;Robert M Waruiru,&nbsp;Paul O Okumu,&nbsp;Joyce Chebet,&nbsp;Philip M Kitala","doi":"10.1155/2018/5402469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are no anticoccidial drugs labelled for rabbits in Kenya and those available are used as extra labels from poultry. The drugs are used in rabbits with limited knowledge of their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sulphachloropyrazine, amprolium hydrochloride, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole relative to diclazuril when used curatively against experimental and natural rabbit coccidiosis. In a controlled laboratory trial, sixty (60) rabbits were randomly allocated to six treatment groups, namely, 1A, 2B, 3C, 4D, 5E, and 6F, each with 10 rabbits. Groups 2B, 3C, 4D, 5E, and 6F were experimentally infected with mixed <i>Eimeria</i> species while group 1A served as uninfected-untreated (negative) control group. Four of the infected groups were treated with sulphachloropyrazine (5E), amprolium hydrochloride (2B), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (6F), and diclazuril (4D) using dosages recommended by manufacturers. Group 3C served as infected-untreated (positive) control. A field efficacy trial in naturally infected rabbits was then undertaken. The results revealed that sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril were effective against rabbit clinical coccidiosis by significantly reducing oocyst counts from 149.00±110.39 x 10<sup>4</sup> to 3.31±0.86 x 10<sup>4</sup> <i>Eimeria</i> spp. oocysts per gram of feces (opg) and 59.70±12.35 x 10<sup>4</sup> to 0.0±0.0 x 10<sup>4</sup> opg, respectively, in the laboratory trial. Similarly, sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril recorded reduced oocyst counts in the field trial from 280.33±44.67 x 10<sup>3</sup> to 0.44±0.14 x 10<sup>3</sup> opg and 473.44±176.01 x 10<sup>3</sup> to 0.0±0.0 x 10<sup>3</sup> opg, respectively. Still, sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril showed superior efficacy by registering lesion scores and fecal scores close to those of uninfected untreated control group. Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole recorded a satisfactory efficacy in the field trial by recording reduced oocyst counts from 266.78±37.03 x 10<sup>3</sup> to 0.75±0.11 x 10<sup>3</sup> opg but was not efficacious in the laboratory trial. Amprolium hydrochloride was not efficacious against clinical coccidiosis in both the experimental and field trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":91135,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medicine","volume":"2018 ","pages":"5402469"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5402469","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Sulphachloropyrazine, Amprolium Hydrochloride, Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole, and Diclazuril against Experimental and Natural Rabbit Coccidiosis.\",\"authors\":\"Kennedy O Ogolla,&nbsp;Peter K Gathumbi,&nbsp;Robert M Waruiru,&nbsp;Paul O Okumu,&nbsp;Joyce Chebet,&nbsp;Philip M Kitala\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/5402469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are no anticoccidial drugs labelled for rabbits in Kenya and those available are used as extra labels from poultry. The drugs are used in rabbits with limited knowledge of their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sulphachloropyrazine, amprolium hydrochloride, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole relative to diclazuril when used curatively against experimental and natural rabbit coccidiosis. In a controlled laboratory trial, sixty (60) rabbits were randomly allocated to six treatment groups, namely, 1A, 2B, 3C, 4D, 5E, and 6F, each with 10 rabbits. Groups 2B, 3C, 4D, 5E, and 6F were experimentally infected with mixed <i>Eimeria</i> species while group 1A served as uninfected-untreated (negative) control group. Four of the infected groups were treated with sulphachloropyrazine (5E), amprolium hydrochloride (2B), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (6F), and diclazuril (4D) using dosages recommended by manufacturers. Group 3C served as infected-untreated (positive) control. A field efficacy trial in naturally infected rabbits was then undertaken. The results revealed that sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril were effective against rabbit clinical coccidiosis by significantly reducing oocyst counts from 149.00±110.39 x 10<sup>4</sup> to 3.31±0.86 x 10<sup>4</sup> <i>Eimeria</i> spp. oocysts per gram of feces (opg) and 59.70±12.35 x 10<sup>4</sup> to 0.0±0.0 x 10<sup>4</sup> opg, respectively, in the laboratory trial. Similarly, sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril recorded reduced oocyst counts in the field trial from 280.33±44.67 x 10<sup>3</sup> to 0.44±0.14 x 10<sup>3</sup> opg and 473.44±176.01 x 10<sup>3</sup> to 0.0±0.0 x 10<sup>3</sup> opg, respectively. Still, sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril showed superior efficacy by registering lesion scores and fecal scores close to those of uninfected untreated control group. Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole recorded a satisfactory efficacy in the field trial by recording reduced oocyst counts from 266.78±37.03 x 10<sup>3</sup> to 0.75±0.11 x 10<sup>3</sup> opg but was not efficacious in the laboratory trial. Amprolium hydrochloride was not efficacious against clinical coccidiosis in both the experimental and field trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91135,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medicine\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"5402469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/5402469\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5402469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5402469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在肯尼亚,没有针对兔子的抗球虫药物标签,可用的抗球虫药物被用作家禽的额外标签。这些药物在兔子身上使用,对其有效性和安全性的了解有限。本研究的目的是确定硫氯吡嗪、盐酸氨丙铵和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑相对于双唑齐治疗实验性和天然兔球虫病的疗效。采用实验室对照试验,将60只家兔随机分为1A、2B、3C、4D、5E、6F 6个处理组,每组10只。2B、3C、4D、5E、6F组实验感染混合艾美耳球虫,1A组为未感染未处理(阴性)对照组。4个感染组采用生产厂家推荐剂量的磺胺氯吡嗪(5E)、盐酸氨丙铵(2B)、甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(6F)和双唑齐(4D)治疗。3C组为感染未处理(阳性)对照组。然后在自然感染的家兔中进行了实地疗效试验。结果表明,硫氯吡嗪和双唑利对家兔临床球虫病有效,可使艾美耳球虫卵囊数从149.00±110.39 × 104减至3.31±0.86 × 104个/克粪便(opg), 59.70±12.35 × 104减至0.0±0.0 × 104个opg。同样,在现场试验中,磺胺氯吡嗪和双唑利的卵囊计数分别从280.33±44.67 × 103减少到0.44±0.14 × 103 opg和473.44±176.01 × 103减少到0.0±0.0 × 103 opg。然而,硫氯吡嗪和双唑利的病变评分和粪便评分与未感染的未治疗对照组接近,显示出优越的疗效。甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑在现场试验中将卵囊计数从266.78±37.03 × 103减少到0.75±0.11 × 103,效果令人满意,但在室内试验中没有效果。在实验和田间试验中,盐酸氨丙铵对球虫病均无疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of Sulphachloropyrazine, Amprolium Hydrochloride, Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole, and Diclazuril against Experimental and Natural Rabbit Coccidiosis.

Efficacy of Sulphachloropyrazine, Amprolium Hydrochloride, Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole, and Diclazuril against Experimental and Natural Rabbit Coccidiosis.

Efficacy of Sulphachloropyrazine, Amprolium Hydrochloride, Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole, and Diclazuril against Experimental and Natural Rabbit Coccidiosis.

Efficacy of Sulphachloropyrazine, Amprolium Hydrochloride, Trimethoprim-Sulphamethoxazole, and Diclazuril against Experimental and Natural Rabbit Coccidiosis.

There are no anticoccidial drugs labelled for rabbits in Kenya and those available are used as extra labels from poultry. The drugs are used in rabbits with limited knowledge of their efficacy and safety. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sulphachloropyrazine, amprolium hydrochloride, and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole relative to diclazuril when used curatively against experimental and natural rabbit coccidiosis. In a controlled laboratory trial, sixty (60) rabbits were randomly allocated to six treatment groups, namely, 1A, 2B, 3C, 4D, 5E, and 6F, each with 10 rabbits. Groups 2B, 3C, 4D, 5E, and 6F were experimentally infected with mixed Eimeria species while group 1A served as uninfected-untreated (negative) control group. Four of the infected groups were treated with sulphachloropyrazine (5E), amprolium hydrochloride (2B), trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole (6F), and diclazuril (4D) using dosages recommended by manufacturers. Group 3C served as infected-untreated (positive) control. A field efficacy trial in naturally infected rabbits was then undertaken. The results revealed that sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril were effective against rabbit clinical coccidiosis by significantly reducing oocyst counts from 149.00±110.39 x 104 to 3.31±0.86 x 104 Eimeria spp. oocysts per gram of feces (opg) and 59.70±12.35 x 104 to 0.0±0.0 x 104 opg, respectively, in the laboratory trial. Similarly, sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril recorded reduced oocyst counts in the field trial from 280.33±44.67 x 103 to 0.44±0.14 x 103 opg and 473.44±176.01 x 103 to 0.0±0.0 x 103 opg, respectively. Still, sulphachloropyrazine and diclazuril showed superior efficacy by registering lesion scores and fecal scores close to those of uninfected untreated control group. Trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole recorded a satisfactory efficacy in the field trial by recording reduced oocyst counts from 266.78±37.03 x 103 to 0.75±0.11 x 103 opg but was not efficacious in the laboratory trial. Amprolium hydrochloride was not efficacious against clinical coccidiosis in both the experimental and field trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信