不消除肉芽组织的非手术治疗种植体周围炎:一项为期3年的研究。

3区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Roberto Crespi, Simone Marconcini, Giovanni Crespi, Enrica Giammarinaro, Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris, Antonio Barone, Ugo Covani
{"title":"不消除肉芽组织的非手术治疗种植体周围炎:一项为期3年的研究。","authors":"Roberto Crespi,&nbsp;Simone Marconcini,&nbsp;Giovanni Crespi,&nbsp;Enrica Giammarinaro,&nbsp;Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris,&nbsp;Antonio Barone,&nbsp;Ugo Covani","doi":"10.1097/ID.0000000000000832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":13309,"journal":{"name":"Implant Dentistry","volume":"28 1","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000832","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Without Eliminating Granulation Tissue: A 3-Year Study.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Crespi,&nbsp;Simone Marconcini,&nbsp;Giovanni Crespi,&nbsp;Enrica Giammarinaro,&nbsp;Giovanni Battista Menchini Fabris,&nbsp;Antonio Barone,&nbsp;Ugo Covani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ID.0000000000000832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"4-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/ID.0000000000000832\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0000000000000832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估一种非手术治疗种植体周围炎的方法,通过机械清创和局部解毒将肉芽组织留在种植体周围口袋。材料和方法:对机械清创联合0.2%氯己定和盐酸氯四环素化学解毒(试验)和单纯机械清创(对照组)两种非手术方案的结果进行分析。在治疗后的基线、3、24和36个月收集测量数据。结果:共纳入种植体周围炎患者75例。在36个月的评估中,试验组的平均口袋探测深度为3.15±0.32 mm,对照组的平均口袋探测深度为5.97±0.90 mm,差异有统计学意义。观察实验组边缘骨质水平是否有改善,对照组边缘骨质是否进一步流失。试验组治疗成功率为100%,对照组为31.4%。结论:单纯非手术性种植体清创治疗种植体周围炎效果不佳。需要进一步的纵向研究来评估化学解毒和去除肉芽组织的机械清创与单独化学解毒的机械清创的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonsurgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis Without Eliminating Granulation Tissue: A 3-Year Study.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a nonsurgical approach toward peri-implantitis by means of mechanical debridement and local detoxification leaving granulation tissue into the peri-implant pockets.

Materials and methods: An analysis was performed on the outcomes of 2 nonsurgical protocols: mechanical debridement plus chemical detoxification with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlortetracycline hydrochloride (test), and mechanical debridement alone (control). Measures were collected at baseline, 3, 24, and 36 months after treatment.

Results: Seventy-five implants with peri-implantitis were included. At a 36-month evaluation, mean pocket probing depth was 3.15 ± 0.32 mm for the test group and 5.97 ± 0.90 mm for the control group, the difference being significant. An improvement of marginal bone level was recorded for the test group, whether the control group showed a further marginal bone loss. Treatment success was 100% in the test group and 31.4% in the control group.

Conclusion: Nonsurgical implant debridement alone seemed not efficient in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Further longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the efficacy of mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification and removal of granulation tissues against mechanical debridement with chemical detoxification alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Implant Dentistry
Implant Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cessation. Implant Dentistry, an interdisciplinary forum for general practitioners, specialists, educators, and researchers, publishes relevant clinical, educational, and research articles that document current concepts of oral implantology in sections on biomaterials, clinical reports, oral and maxillofacial surgery, oral pathology, periodontics, prosthodontics, and research. The journal includes guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, abstracts of current literature, and news of sponsoring societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信