埃及Minia产科分娩保健专业人员对分娩镇痛方法的认识和实践。

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ola Mousa, Amal Ahmed Abdelhafez, Ahmed R Abdelraheim, Ayman M Yousef, Ahmed A Ghaney, Saad El Gelany
{"title":"埃及Minia产科分娩保健专业人员对分娩镇痛方法的认识和实践。","authors":"Ola Mousa,&nbsp;Amal Ahmed Abdelhafez,&nbsp;Ahmed R Abdelraheim,&nbsp;Ayman M Yousef,&nbsp;Ahmed A Ghaney,&nbsp;Saad El Gelany","doi":"10.1155/2018/3060953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In low-resource settings (LRSs), pain relief during labor is often neglected. Women and health professionals (HPs) may lack awareness of analgesic options, may not accept these options, or may have concerns regarding their safety. Furthermore, even if women or HPs preferred labor analgesia, options may not be available at the hospital. This study was carried out to explore how HPs perceive and practice pain management during labor in Minia maternity units in Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured, self-administered questionnaire from 306 HPs in Minia maternity units from August 1, 2016, to August 30, 2017, after approval by the organizational Ethical Review Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 76.5%. The majority, 78.2% of participants, believed in pain relief during labor. However, their practices are different. In the first stage of labor, almost 44.9% used nonpharmacological methods, whereas 36.8% used neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological methods. Hospital-related factors were the major barriers against using pain-relief methods, as stated by HPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most HPs understand the role of analgesia in labor pain relief, there is a wide gap between the use of pain-relief methods and women's need in Minia, Egypt; HPs claim this is due to health care facilities. There is an urgent need to identify the barriers against and raise the awareness among the community and HPs of the need to use pain-relief methods as part of improving the quality of care during labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":19439,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","volume":"2018 ","pages":"3060953"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3060953","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions and Practice of Labor Pain-Relief Methods among Health Professionals Conducting Delivery in Minia Maternity Units in Egypt.\",\"authors\":\"Ola Mousa,&nbsp;Amal Ahmed Abdelhafez,&nbsp;Ahmed R Abdelraheim,&nbsp;Ayman M Yousef,&nbsp;Ahmed A Ghaney,&nbsp;Saad El Gelany\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/3060953\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In low-resource settings (LRSs), pain relief during labor is often neglected. Women and health professionals (HPs) may lack awareness of analgesic options, may not accept these options, or may have concerns regarding their safety. Furthermore, even if women or HPs preferred labor analgesia, options may not be available at the hospital. This study was carried out to explore how HPs perceive and practice pain management during labor in Minia maternity units in Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured, self-administered questionnaire from 306 HPs in Minia maternity units from August 1, 2016, to August 30, 2017, after approval by the organizational Ethical Review Committee.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 76.5%. The majority, 78.2% of participants, believed in pain relief during labor. However, their practices are different. In the first stage of labor, almost 44.9% used nonpharmacological methods, whereas 36.8% used neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological methods. Hospital-related factors were the major barriers against using pain-relief methods, as stated by HPs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although most HPs understand the role of analgesia in labor pain relief, there is a wide gap between the use of pain-relief methods and women's need in Minia, Egypt; HPs claim this is due to health care facilities. There is an urgent need to identify the barriers against and raise the awareness among the community and HPs of the need to use pain-relief methods as part of improving the quality of care during labor.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"3060953\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/3060953\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Obstetrics and Gynecology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3060953\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and Gynecology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3060953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

引言:在低资源环境中,分娩期间的疼痛缓解往往被忽视。妇女和卫生专业人员可能对镇痛选择缺乏认识,可能不接受这些选择,或者可能对其安全性有顾虑。此外,即使女性或HP更喜欢分娩镇痛,医院也可能没有选择。本研究旨在探讨埃及Minia产科病房的HPs如何感知和实践分娩期间的疼痛管理。方法:经组织伦理审查委员会批准,对2016年8月1日至2017年8月30日期间Minia产科单元的306名HPs进行结构化、自填式问卷调查。结果:应答率为76.5%,78.2%的参与者认为分娩期间疼痛减轻。然而,他们的做法不同。在分娩的第一阶段,几乎44.9%的人使用了非药物方法,而36.8%的人既不使用药物方法也不使用非药物方法。医院相关因素是阻碍使用镇痛方法的主要障碍,如HPs所述。结论:尽管大多数HPs了解镇痛在分娩镇痛中的作用,但在埃及米尼亚,镇痛方法的使用与妇女的需求之间存在很大差距;HP声称这是由于医疗机构造成的。迫切需要确定障碍,并提高社区和HPs对使用止痛方法作为提高分娩护理质量的一部分的必要性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions and Practice of Labor Pain-Relief Methods among Health Professionals Conducting Delivery in Minia Maternity Units in Egypt.

Introduction: In low-resource settings (LRSs), pain relief during labor is often neglected. Women and health professionals (HPs) may lack awareness of analgesic options, may not accept these options, or may have concerns regarding their safety. Furthermore, even if women or HPs preferred labor analgesia, options may not be available at the hospital. This study was carried out to explore how HPs perceive and practice pain management during labor in Minia maternity units in Egypt.

Methods: A structured, self-administered questionnaire from 306 HPs in Minia maternity units from August 1, 2016, to August 30, 2017, after approval by the organizational Ethical Review Committee.

Results: The response rate was 76.5%. The majority, 78.2% of participants, believed in pain relief during labor. However, their practices are different. In the first stage of labor, almost 44.9% used nonpharmacological methods, whereas 36.8% used neither pharmacological nor nonpharmacological methods. Hospital-related factors were the major barriers against using pain-relief methods, as stated by HPs.

Conclusion: Although most HPs understand the role of analgesia in labor pain relief, there is a wide gap between the use of pain-relief methods and women's need in Minia, Egypt; HPs claim this is due to health care facilities. There is an urgent need to identify the barriers against and raise the awareness among the community and HPs of the need to use pain-relief methods as part of improving the quality of care during labor.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and Gynecology International
Obstetrics and Gynecology International OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Obstetrics and Gynecology International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that aims to provide a forum for scientists and clinical professionals working in obstetrics and gynecology. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to obstetrics, maternal-fetal medicine, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine and infertility, reproductive endocrinology, and sexual medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信