扩大聚焦深度的人工晶状体的最大屈光效果。

IF 0.4 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Open Ophthalmology Journal Pub Date : 2018-09-28 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874364101812010273
Barry Power, Rory Murphy, Antonio Leccisotti, Tara Moore, William Power, Paul O'Brien
{"title":"扩大聚焦深度的人工晶状体的最大屈光效果。","authors":"Barry Power,&nbsp;Rory Murphy,&nbsp;Antonio Leccisotti,&nbsp;Tara Moore,&nbsp;William Power,&nbsp;Paul O'Brien","doi":"10.2174/1874364101812010273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the magnitude of preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism on refractive outcomes in patients undergoing cataract surgery or lens exchange with an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. To compare visual outcomes of steep and temporal on-axis corneal incisions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three consecutive adult patients (94 eyes) undergoing routine phacoemulsification with Symfony IOL implantation were analysed. Exclusion criteria: targets for mini-monovision, incomplete data, other ocular pathology. Data were prospectively collected on pre- and postoperative refraction, keratometry, distance vision, near vision, surgical wound site and Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average postoperative monocular Uncorrected Distance and Near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA) were 0.12 LogMAR (± 0.1) (6/7.5<sup>+1</sup>) and 0.34 LogMAR (± 0.09) respectively. The average binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.05 (± 0.07) and 0.29 LogMAR (± 0.06) respectively. Low levels of preoperative corneal astigmatism (0-0.99 D) were associated with better LogMAR UDVA and UNVA when compared with higher levels (> 0.99 D): 0.11 (CI 0.103-0.107) <i>vs.</i> 0.206 (CI 0.122-0.290) (<i>p</i> =0.015, CI 95%) and 0.33 (CI 0.316 - 0.356) <i>vs.</i> 0.39 (CI 0.34-0.43) (<i>p</i> =0.034, CI 95%) respectively. When patients with steep on-axis corneal incisions were compared with temporal on-axis corneal incisions, no difference was detected in visual outcome or SIA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Symfony IOL is an effective surgical means of addressing presbyopia and reducing postoperative spectacle dependence. We stress caution when offering potential spectacle independence for patients with over 1D of preoperative corneal astigmatism as these patients achieve statistically significantly inferior and less predictable visual results.</p>","PeriodicalId":46347,"journal":{"name":"Open Ophthalmology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874364101812010273","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maximising Refractive Outcomes with an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.\",\"authors\":\"Barry Power,&nbsp;Rory Murphy,&nbsp;Antonio Leccisotti,&nbsp;Tara Moore,&nbsp;William Power,&nbsp;Paul O'Brien\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874364101812010273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the magnitude of preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism on refractive outcomes in patients undergoing cataract surgery or lens exchange with an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. To compare visual outcomes of steep and temporal on-axis corneal incisions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Ophthalmology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three consecutive adult patients (94 eyes) undergoing routine phacoemulsification with Symfony IOL implantation were analysed. Exclusion criteria: targets for mini-monovision, incomplete data, other ocular pathology. Data were prospectively collected on pre- and postoperative refraction, keratometry, distance vision, near vision, surgical wound site and Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average postoperative monocular Uncorrected Distance and Near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA) were 0.12 LogMAR (± 0.1) (6/7.5<sup>+1</sup>) and 0.34 LogMAR (± 0.09) respectively. The average binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.05 (± 0.07) and 0.29 LogMAR (± 0.06) respectively. Low levels of preoperative corneal astigmatism (0-0.99 D) were associated with better LogMAR UDVA and UNVA when compared with higher levels (> 0.99 D): 0.11 (CI 0.103-0.107) <i>vs.</i> 0.206 (CI 0.122-0.290) (<i>p</i> =0.015, CI 95%) and 0.33 (CI 0.316 - 0.356) <i>vs.</i> 0.39 (CI 0.34-0.43) (<i>p</i> =0.034, CI 95%) respectively. When patients with steep on-axis corneal incisions were compared with temporal on-axis corneal incisions, no difference was detected in visual outcome or SIA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Symfony IOL is an effective surgical means of addressing presbyopia and reducing postoperative spectacle dependence. We stress caution when offering potential spectacle independence for patients with over 1D of preoperative corneal astigmatism as these patients achieve statistically significantly inferior and less predictable visual results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Ophthalmology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874364101812010273\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Ophthalmology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ophthalmology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

目的:评价术前和术后角膜散光程度对白内障手术或人工晶状体置换术患者屈光结果的影响。比较斜面和颞轴角膜切口的视觉效果。地点:爱尔兰都柏林贝莱德诊所眼科。设计:前瞻性队列分析。方法:对连续53例(94眼)行常规超声乳化术联合Symfony人工晶状体植入术的成人患者进行分析。排除标准:小单视目标、资料不全、其他眼部病理。前瞻性地收集术前和术后屈光、角膜测量、远视力、近视力、手术伤口部位和手术性散光(SIA)的数据。结果:术后平均单眼未矫正距离和近视力(UDVA和UNVA)分别为0.12 LogMAR(±0.1)(6/7.5+1)和0.34 LogMAR(±0.09)。双眼平均UDVA和UNVA分别为0.05(±0.07)和0.29 LogMAR(±0.06)。术前角膜散光水平低(0-0.99 D)与较高水平(> 0.99 D)相比,较好的LogMAR UDVA和UNVA相关:分别为0.11 (CI 0.103-0.107)对0.206 (CI 0.122-0.290) (p =0.015, CI 95%)和0.33 (CI 0.316 - 0.356)对0.39 (CI 0.34-0.43) (p =0.034, CI 95%)。当角膜轴上切口较陡的患者与颞轴上切口的患者相比,在视力和SIA方面没有发现差异。结论:Symfony人工晶状体植入术是治疗老花眼和减少术后对眼镜依赖的有效手术手段。我们在为术前角膜散光超过1D的患者提供潜在的眼镜独立治疗时强调谨慎,因为这些患者的视力结果在统计学上明显较差且难以预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Maximising Refractive Outcomes with an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

Maximising Refractive Outcomes with an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

Maximising Refractive Outcomes with an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

Maximising Refractive Outcomes with an Extended Depth of Focus IOL.

Objective: To assess the impact of the magnitude of preoperative and postoperative corneal astigmatism on refractive outcomes in patients undergoing cataract surgery or lens exchange with an extended depth of focus intraocular lens. To compare visual outcomes of steep and temporal on-axis corneal incisions.

Setting: Department of Ophthalmology, Blackrock Clinic, Dublin, Ireland.

Design: Prospective cohort analysis.

Methods: Fifty-three consecutive adult patients (94 eyes) undergoing routine phacoemulsification with Symfony IOL implantation were analysed. Exclusion criteria: targets for mini-monovision, incomplete data, other ocular pathology. Data were prospectively collected on pre- and postoperative refraction, keratometry, distance vision, near vision, surgical wound site and Surgically Induced Astigmatism (SIA).

Results: The average postoperative monocular Uncorrected Distance and Near visual acuities (UDVA and UNVA) were 0.12 LogMAR (± 0.1) (6/7.5+1) and 0.34 LogMAR (± 0.09) respectively. The average binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.05 (± 0.07) and 0.29 LogMAR (± 0.06) respectively. Low levels of preoperative corneal astigmatism (0-0.99 D) were associated with better LogMAR UDVA and UNVA when compared with higher levels (> 0.99 D): 0.11 (CI 0.103-0.107) vs. 0.206 (CI 0.122-0.290) (p =0.015, CI 95%) and 0.33 (CI 0.316 - 0.356) vs. 0.39 (CI 0.34-0.43) (p =0.034, CI 95%) respectively. When patients with steep on-axis corneal incisions were compared with temporal on-axis corneal incisions, no difference was detected in visual outcome or SIA.

Conclusion: The Symfony IOL is an effective surgical means of addressing presbyopia and reducing postoperative spectacle dependence. We stress caution when offering potential spectacle independence for patients with over 1D of preoperative corneal astigmatism as these patients achieve statistically significantly inferior and less predictable visual results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Open Ophthalmology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in ophthalmology, including use of ophthalmological therapies, devices and surgical techniques. The Open Ophthalmology Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and making them freely available to researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信