[腹内感染患者分离细菌的微生物谱及药敏分析]。

Marta Kierzkowska, Anna Majewska, Anna Sawicka-Grzelak, Andrzej Mlynarczyk, Gratyna Mlynarczyk
{"title":"[腹内感染患者分离细菌的微生物谱及药敏分析]。","authors":"Marta Kierzkowska,&nbsp;Anna Majewska,&nbsp;Anna Sawicka-Grzelak,&nbsp;Andrzej Mlynarczyk,&nbsp;Gratyna Mlynarczyk","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>the analyzed peritoneal fluid and bile specimens were comparable. Multiple bacterial species were significantly more common in bile isolates than in peritoneal fluid isolates. A total of 61,7% of aerobic Gram-negative bacillus isolates obtained from peritoneal fluid and bile produced ESBL. The proportions of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and enterococci exhibiting high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) were 32,6% and 43,5%, respectively. Ertapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was detected in 22,2% of peritoneal fluid cultures and 71,4% of biliary cultures. Methicillin resistance was detected in 85,7% of staphylococcal isolates. The proportion of anaerobes detected in peritoneal fluids was relatively high at approximately 17% and included predominantly Gram- negative species. All Gram-negative anaerobes showed resistance to benzylpenicillin. Conclusions: Etiologies and susceptibility pattern of IAls must be monitored on a ward, hospital, regional, and world-wide scale and the findings implemented into epidemiologic surveillance programs and proposed treatment protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":18521,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"68 2","pages":"95-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infection].\",\"authors\":\"Marta Kierzkowska,&nbsp;Anna Majewska,&nbsp;Anna Sawicka-Grzelak,&nbsp;Andrzej Mlynarczyk,&nbsp;Gratyna Mlynarczyk\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>the analyzed peritoneal fluid and bile specimens were comparable. Multiple bacterial species were significantly more common in bile isolates than in peritoneal fluid isolates. A total of 61,7% of aerobic Gram-negative bacillus isolates obtained from peritoneal fluid and bile produced ESBL. The proportions of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and enterococci exhibiting high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) were 32,6% and 43,5%, respectively. Ertapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was detected in 22,2% of peritoneal fluid cultures and 71,4% of biliary cultures. Methicillin resistance was detected in 85,7% of staphylococcal isolates. The proportion of anaerobes detected in peritoneal fluids was relatively high at approximately 17% and included predominantly Gram- negative species. All Gram-negative anaerobes showed resistance to benzylpenicillin. Conclusions: Etiologies and susceptibility pattern of IAls must be monitored on a ward, hospital, regional, and world-wide scale and the findings implemented into epidemiologic surveillance programs and proposed treatment protocols.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18521,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia\",\"volume\":\"68 2\",\"pages\":\"95-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doswiadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

分析的腹膜液和胆汁标本具有可比性。多种细菌种类在胆汁分离物中比在腹膜液分离物中更常见。从腹膜液和胆汁中分离出的需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌共61.7%产生ESBL。万古霉素耐药肠球菌(VRE)和高氨基糖苷耐药肠球菌(HLAR)的比例分别为32.6%和43.5%。在22.2%的腹膜液培养和71.4%的胆道培养中检测到耐厄他培宁肺炎克雷伯菌。85.7%的葡萄球菌对甲氧西林耐药。腹膜液中检测到的厌氧菌比例相对较高,约为17%,主要包括革兰氏阴性菌。所有革兰氏阴性厌氧菌均对青霉素耐药。结论:必须在病房、医院、地区和世界范围内监测急性呼吸道感染的病因和易感模式,并将调查结果纳入流行病学监测计划和拟议的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Microbiologic spectrum and susceptibility of bacteria isolated from patients with intra-abdominal infection].

the analyzed peritoneal fluid and bile specimens were comparable. Multiple bacterial species were significantly more common in bile isolates than in peritoneal fluid isolates. A total of 61,7% of aerobic Gram-negative bacillus isolates obtained from peritoneal fluid and bile produced ESBL. The proportions of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and enterococci exhibiting high-level aminoglycoside resistance (HLAR) were 32,6% and 43,5%, respectively. Ertapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae was detected in 22,2% of peritoneal fluid cultures and 71,4% of biliary cultures. Methicillin resistance was detected in 85,7% of staphylococcal isolates. The proportion of anaerobes detected in peritoneal fluids was relatively high at approximately 17% and included predominantly Gram- negative species. All Gram-negative anaerobes showed resistance to benzylpenicillin. Conclusions: Etiologies and susceptibility pattern of IAls must be monitored on a ward, hospital, regional, and world-wide scale and the findings implemented into epidemiologic surveillance programs and proposed treatment protocols.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信