海洋微生物天然产物与陆地微生物天然产物有何不同?__

IF 10.6 1区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Tanja M. Voser , Max D. Campbell , Anthony R. Carroll
{"title":"海洋微生物天然产物与陆地微生物天然产物有何不同?__","authors":"Tanja M. Voser ,&nbsp;Max D. Campbell ,&nbsp;Anthony R. Carroll","doi":"10.1039/d1np00051a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Covering: 1877 to 2020</p><p>A key challenge in natural products research is the selection of biodiversity to yield novel chemistry. Recently, marine microorganisms have become a preferred source. But how novel are marine microorganism natural products compared to those reported from terrestrial microbes? Cluster analysis of chemical fingerprints and molecular scaffold analysis of 55 817 compounds reported from marine and terrestrial microorganisms, and marine macro-organisms showed that 76.7% of the compounds isolated from marine microorganisms are closely related to compounds isolated from terrestrial microorganisms. Only 14.3% of marine microorganism natural products are unique when marine macro-organism natural products are also considered. Studies targeting marine specific and understudied microbial phyla result in a higher likelihood of finding marine specific compounds, whereas the depth and geographic location of microorganism collection have little influence. We recommend marine targeted strain isolation, incorporating early use of genomic sequencing to guide strain selection, innovation in culture media and cultivation techniques and the application of cheminformatics tools to focus on unique natural product diversity, rather than the dereplication of known compounds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94,"journal":{"name":"Natural Product Reports","volume":"39 1","pages":"Pages 7-19"},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How different are marine microbial natural products compared to their terrestrial counterparts?†\",\"authors\":\"Tanja M. Voser ,&nbsp;Max D. Campbell ,&nbsp;Anthony R. Carroll\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d1np00051a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Covering: 1877 to 2020</p><p>A key challenge in natural products research is the selection of biodiversity to yield novel chemistry. Recently, marine microorganisms have become a preferred source. But how novel are marine microorganism natural products compared to those reported from terrestrial microbes? Cluster analysis of chemical fingerprints and molecular scaffold analysis of 55 817 compounds reported from marine and terrestrial microorganisms, and marine macro-organisms showed that 76.7% of the compounds isolated from marine microorganisms are closely related to compounds isolated from terrestrial microorganisms. Only 14.3% of marine microorganism natural products are unique when marine macro-organism natural products are also considered. Studies targeting marine specific and understudied microbial phyla result in a higher likelihood of finding marine specific compounds, whereas the depth and geographic location of microorganism collection have little influence. We recommend marine targeted strain isolation, incorporating early use of genomic sequencing to guide strain selection, innovation in culture media and cultivation techniques and the application of cheminformatics tools to focus on unique natural product diversity, rather than the dereplication of known compounds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Product Reports\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 7-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Product Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S026505682200856X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Product Reports","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S026505682200856X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

自然产物研究的一个关键挑战是选择生物多样性以产生新的化学物质。最近,海洋微生物已成为首选来源。但是,与陆地微生物相比,海洋微生物的天然产物有多新颖呢?从海洋、陆地微生物和海洋大型生物中分离得到的55 817个化合物的化学指纹图谱聚类分析和分子支架分析表明,从海洋微生物中分离到的化合物中有76.7%与从陆地微生物中分离到的化合物密切相关。当考虑海洋大型生物天然产物时,只有14.3%的海洋微生物天然产物是独特的。针对海洋特定和未充分研究的微生物门的研究结果更有可能发现海洋特定化合物,而微生物收集的深度和地理位置几乎没有影响。我们建议进行海洋目标菌株分离,结合早期使用基因组测序来指导菌株选择,创新培养基和培养技术,以及应用化学信息学工具来关注独特的天然产物多样性,而不是已知化合物的重复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How different are marine microbial natural products compared to their terrestrial counterparts?†

How different are marine microbial natural products compared to their terrestrial counterparts?†

Covering: 1877 to 2020

A key challenge in natural products research is the selection of biodiversity to yield novel chemistry. Recently, marine microorganisms have become a preferred source. But how novel are marine microorganism natural products compared to those reported from terrestrial microbes? Cluster analysis of chemical fingerprints and molecular scaffold analysis of 55 817 compounds reported from marine and terrestrial microorganisms, and marine macro-organisms showed that 76.7% of the compounds isolated from marine microorganisms are closely related to compounds isolated from terrestrial microorganisms. Only 14.3% of marine microorganism natural products are unique when marine macro-organism natural products are also considered. Studies targeting marine specific and understudied microbial phyla result in a higher likelihood of finding marine specific compounds, whereas the depth and geographic location of microorganism collection have little influence. We recommend marine targeted strain isolation, incorporating early use of genomic sequencing to guide strain selection, innovation in culture media and cultivation techniques and the application of cheminformatics tools to focus on unique natural product diversity, rather than the dereplication of known compounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Natural Product Reports
Natural Product Reports 化学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
127
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Natural Product Reports (NPR) serves as a pivotal critical review journal propelling advancements in all facets of natural products research, encompassing isolation, structural and stereochemical determination, biosynthesis, biological activity, and synthesis. With a broad scope, NPR extends its influence into the wider bioinorganic, bioorganic, and chemical biology communities. Covering areas such as enzymology, nucleic acids, genetics, chemical ecology, carbohydrates, primary and secondary metabolism, and analytical techniques, the journal provides insightful articles focusing on key developments shaping the field, rather than offering exhaustive overviews of all results. NPR encourages authors to infuse their perspectives on developments, trends, and future directions, fostering a dynamic exchange of ideas within the natural products research community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信