杜氏肌营养不良患者护理依从性初步调查研究。

Kristin Conway, Christina Trout, Christina Westfield, Deborah Fox, Shree Pandya
{"title":"杜氏肌营养不良患者护理依从性初步调查研究。","authors":"Kristin Conway,&nbsp;Christina Trout,&nbsp;Christina Westfield,&nbsp;Deborah Fox,&nbsp;Shree Pandya","doi":"10.1371/currents.md.5f533e6e60ee172d6bf6b2b8375dfadf","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction Care Considerations supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy were published in 2010, but there has been limited study of implementation in the United States. Methods A questionnaire collecting information about standard care practices and perceived barriers was piloted by 9 clinic directors of facilities within the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking and Research network. Results Six clinic directors completed the questionnaire; 1 adult-only clinic was excluded. Over 80% adherence was found for 30 of 55 recommendations examined. Greatest variability was for initiation of corticosteroids, bone health monitoring, type of pulmonary function testing, and psychosocial management. Barriers included unclear guidelines, inadequate time and funding, family-specific barriers and lack of empirical support for some recommendations. Discussion This pilot study showed implementation of the 2010 Care Considerations, except for recommendations based largely on expert consensus. Complete adherence requires more studies and active promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":74464,"journal":{"name":"PLoS currents","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128678/pdf/","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pilot Survey Study of Adherence to Care Considerations for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.\",\"authors\":\"Kristin Conway,&nbsp;Christina Trout,&nbsp;Christina Westfield,&nbsp;Deborah Fox,&nbsp;Shree Pandya\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/currents.md.5f533e6e60ee172d6bf6b2b8375dfadf\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Introduction Care Considerations supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy were published in 2010, but there has been limited study of implementation in the United States. Methods A questionnaire collecting information about standard care practices and perceived barriers was piloted by 9 clinic directors of facilities within the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking and Research network. Results Six clinic directors completed the questionnaire; 1 adult-only clinic was excluded. Over 80% adherence was found for 30 of 55 recommendations examined. Greatest variability was for initiation of corticosteroids, bone health monitoring, type of pulmonary function testing, and psychosocial management. Barriers included unclear guidelines, inadequate time and funding, family-specific barriers and lack of empirical support for some recommendations. Discussion This pilot study showed implementation of the 2010 Care Considerations, except for recommendations based largely on expert consensus. Complete adherence requires more studies and active promotion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS currents\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6128678/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.md.5f533e6e60ee172d6bf6b2b8375dfadf\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.md.5f533e6e60ee172d6bf6b2b8375dfadf","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

由疾病控制和预防中心支持的治疗杜氏肌营养不良症的注意事项于2010年发表,但在美国实施的研究有限。方法对肌萎缩症监测、跟踪和研究网络内9家机构的临床主任进行问卷调查,收集有关标准治疗方法和感知障碍的信息。结果6名临床主任完成问卷调查;排除1家成人诊所。55项建议中有30项的依从性超过80%。最大的差异是开始使用皮质类固醇、骨骼健康监测、肺功能测试类型和心理社会管理。障碍包括指导方针不明确、时间和资金不足、家庭特有的障碍以及对某些建议缺乏经验支持。除了主要基于专家共识的建议外,该试点研究显示了2010年护理注意事项的实施情况。完全坚持需要更多的研究和积极的促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Pilot Survey Study of Adherence to Care Considerations for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

A Pilot Survey Study of Adherence to Care Considerations for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Introduction Care Considerations supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for the management of Duchenne muscular dystrophy were published in 2010, but there has been limited study of implementation in the United States. Methods A questionnaire collecting information about standard care practices and perceived barriers was piloted by 9 clinic directors of facilities within the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking and Research network. Results Six clinic directors completed the questionnaire; 1 adult-only clinic was excluded. Over 80% adherence was found for 30 of 55 recommendations examined. Greatest variability was for initiation of corticosteroids, bone health monitoring, type of pulmonary function testing, and psychosocial management. Barriers included unclear guidelines, inadequate time and funding, family-specific barriers and lack of empirical support for some recommendations. Discussion This pilot study showed implementation of the 2010 Care Considerations, except for recommendations based largely on expert consensus. Complete adherence requires more studies and active promotion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信