综合医疗护理对新生儿重症监护病房气管切开术患儿远期预后的影响。

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-31 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874306401812010039
Wilfredo De Jesus-Rojas, Ricardo A Mosquera, Cheryl Samuels, Julie Eapen, Traci Gonzales, Tomika Harris, Sandra McKay, Fatima Boricha, Claudia Pedroza, Chiamaka Aneji, Amir Khan, Cindy Jon, Katrina McBeth, James Stark, Aravind Yadav, Jon E Tyson
{"title":"综合医疗护理对新生儿重症监护病房气管切开术患儿远期预后的影响。","authors":"Wilfredo De Jesus-Rojas,&nbsp;Ricardo A Mosquera,&nbsp;Cheryl Samuels,&nbsp;Julie Eapen,&nbsp;Traci Gonzales,&nbsp;Tomika Harris,&nbsp;Sandra McKay,&nbsp;Fatima Boricha,&nbsp;Claudia Pedroza,&nbsp;Chiamaka Aneji,&nbsp;Amir Khan,&nbsp;Cindy Jon,&nbsp;Katrina McBeth,&nbsp;James Stark,&nbsp;Aravind Yadav,&nbsp;Jon E Tyson","doi":"10.2174/1874306401812010039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival of infants with complex care has led to a growing population of technology-dependent children. Medical technology introduces additional complexity to patient care. Outcomes after NICU discharge comparing Usual Care (UC) with Comprehensive Care (CC) remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of technology-dependent infants discharged from NICU with tracheostomy following UC versus CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single site retrospective study evaluated forty-three (N=43) technology-dependent infants discharged from NICU with tracheostomy over 5½ years (2011-2017). CC provided 24-hour accessible healthcare-providers using an enhanced medical home. Mortality, total hospital admissions, 30-days readmission rate, time-to-mechanical ventilation liberation, and time-to-decannulation were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CC group showed significantly lower mortality (3.4%) versus UC (35.7%), RR, 0.09 [95%CI, 0.12-0.75], P=0.025. CC reduced total hospital admissions to 78 per 100 child-years versus 162 for UC; RR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.93], P=0.03. The 30-day readmission rate was 21% compared to 36% in UC; RR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.21-1.58], P=0.29). In competing-risk regression analysis (treating death as a competing-risk), hazard of having mechanical ventilation removal in CC was two times higher than UC; SHR, 2.19 [95% CI, 0.70-6.84]. There was no difference in time-to-decannulation between groups; SHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.37-3.15].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CC significantly decreased mortality, total number of hospital admissions and length of time-to-mechanical ventilation liberation.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"39-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110063/pdf/","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Comprehensive Medical Care on the Long-Term Outcomes of Children Discharged from the NICU with Tracheostomy.\",\"authors\":\"Wilfredo De Jesus-Rojas,&nbsp;Ricardo A Mosquera,&nbsp;Cheryl Samuels,&nbsp;Julie Eapen,&nbsp;Traci Gonzales,&nbsp;Tomika Harris,&nbsp;Sandra McKay,&nbsp;Fatima Boricha,&nbsp;Claudia Pedroza,&nbsp;Chiamaka Aneji,&nbsp;Amir Khan,&nbsp;Cindy Jon,&nbsp;Katrina McBeth,&nbsp;James Stark,&nbsp;Aravind Yadav,&nbsp;Jon E Tyson\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874306401812010039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Survival of infants with complex care has led to a growing population of technology-dependent children. Medical technology introduces additional complexity to patient care. Outcomes after NICU discharge comparing Usual Care (UC) with Comprehensive Care (CC) remain elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the outcomes of technology-dependent infants discharged from NICU with tracheostomy following UC versus CC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single site retrospective study evaluated forty-three (N=43) technology-dependent infants discharged from NICU with tracheostomy over 5½ years (2011-2017). CC provided 24-hour accessible healthcare-providers using an enhanced medical home. Mortality, total hospital admissions, 30-days readmission rate, time-to-mechanical ventilation liberation, and time-to-decannulation were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CC group showed significantly lower mortality (3.4%) versus UC (35.7%), RR, 0.09 [95%CI, 0.12-0.75], P=0.025. CC reduced total hospital admissions to 78 per 100 child-years versus 162 for UC; RR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.93], P=0.03. The 30-day readmission rate was 21% compared to 36% in UC; RR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.21-1.58], P=0.29). In competing-risk regression analysis (treating death as a competing-risk), hazard of having mechanical ventilation removal in CC was two times higher than UC; SHR, 2.19 [95% CI, 0.70-6.84]. There was no difference in time-to-decannulation between groups; SHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.37-3.15].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CC significantly decreased mortality, total number of hospital admissions and length of time-to-mechanical ventilation liberation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"39-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6110063/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306401812010039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306401812010039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

背景:复杂护理婴儿的生存导致越来越多的技术依赖儿童。医疗技术给病人护理带来了额外的复杂性。NICU出院后的结果比较常规护理(UC)和综合护理(CC)仍然难以捉摸。目的:比较新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)气管造口术后出院的技术依赖婴儿与UC和cc的预后。方法:一项单点回顾性研究评估了43例(N=43) 5年半(2011-2017)的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)气管造口术后出院的技术依赖婴儿。CC通过增强型医疗之家提供24小时无障碍保健服务。两组患者的死亡率、总住院率、30天再入院率、解除机械通气时间和脱管时间进行比较。结果:CC组死亡率(3.4%)明显低于UC组(35.7%),RR为0.09 [95%CI, 0.12-0.75], P=0.025。CC将总住院率降低至78 / 100儿童年,UC为162 / 100儿童年;Rr, 0.48 [95% ci, 0.25 ~ 0.93], p =0.03。30天再入院率为21%,而UC为36%;Rr, 0.58 [95% ci, 0.21-1.58], p =0.29)。在竞争风险回归分析中(将死亡视为竞争风险),CC患者机械通气移除的危险性比UC患者高2倍;Shr, 2.19 [95% ci, 0.70-6.84]。两组间退管时间无差异;Shr, 1.09 [95% ci, 0.37-3.15]。结论:CC可显著降低死亡率、住院总次数和解除机械通气所需时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Comprehensive Medical Care on the Long-Term Outcomes of Children Discharged from the NICU with Tracheostomy.

The Effect of Comprehensive Medical Care on the Long-Term Outcomes of Children Discharged from the NICU with Tracheostomy.

The Effect of Comprehensive Medical Care on the Long-Term Outcomes of Children Discharged from the NICU with Tracheostomy.

The Effect of Comprehensive Medical Care on the Long-Term Outcomes of Children Discharged from the NICU with Tracheostomy.

Background: Survival of infants with complex care has led to a growing population of technology-dependent children. Medical technology introduces additional complexity to patient care. Outcomes after NICU discharge comparing Usual Care (UC) with Comprehensive Care (CC) remain elusive.

Objective: To compare the outcomes of technology-dependent infants discharged from NICU with tracheostomy following UC versus CC.

Methods: A single site retrospective study evaluated forty-three (N=43) technology-dependent infants discharged from NICU with tracheostomy over 5½ years (2011-2017). CC provided 24-hour accessible healthcare-providers using an enhanced medical home. Mortality, total hospital admissions, 30-days readmission rate, time-to-mechanical ventilation liberation, and time-to-decannulation were compared between groups.

Results: CC group showed significantly lower mortality (3.4%) versus UC (35.7%), RR, 0.09 [95%CI, 0.12-0.75], P=0.025. CC reduced total hospital admissions to 78 per 100 child-years versus 162 for UC; RR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.93], P=0.03. The 30-day readmission rate was 21% compared to 36% in UC; RR, 0.58 [95% CI, 0.21-1.58], P=0.29). In competing-risk regression analysis (treating death as a competing-risk), hazard of having mechanical ventilation removal in CC was two times higher than UC; SHR, 2.19 [95% CI, 0.70-6.84]. There was no difference in time-to-decannulation between groups; SHR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.37-3.15].

Conclusion: CC significantly decreased mortality, total number of hospital admissions and length of time-to-mechanical ventilation liberation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信