希腊人肺活量测定值与慢性阻塞性肺病患者ECSC和GLI值的比较。

Q3 Medicine
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-31 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874306401812010029
Nikolaos Tatsis, Sotirios Kakavas, Evgenios Metaxas, Evangelos Balis, George Tatsis, Nikolaos Pantazis, Petros Bakakos, Nikolaos Koulouris, Κostantinos Hadjistavrou
{"title":"希腊人肺活量测定值与慢性阻塞性肺病患者ECSC和GLI值的比较。","authors":"Nikolaos Tatsis,&nbsp;Sotirios Kakavas,&nbsp;Evgenios Metaxas,&nbsp;Evangelos Balis,&nbsp;George Tatsis,&nbsp;Nikolaos Pantazis,&nbsp;Petros Bakakos,&nbsp;Nikolaos Koulouris,&nbsp;Κostantinos Hadjistavrou","doi":"10.2174/1874306401812010029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the past few years, the use of criteria introduced by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) is recommended for the diagnosis and classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD),taking into account the values of a Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 second (FEV1) and a Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 second (FEV1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio. In Europe, the reference values of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), that were originally developed in 1993 are still used.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The study aimed to carry out measurement of spirometric values in a healthy, non smoking Greek population, development of local equations and comparison with ECSC and Global Lung Initiative(GLI) equations, in order to see if there is a need for separate ones in everyday use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Normal predicted values for FEV1 and FEV1/FVC% were obtained from a group of 500 healthy subjects, aged 18-89 years. In addition, a group of 124 COPD patients, with no other comorbidities was studied. Patients were classified according to GOLD criteria in four groups with ECSC, GLI predicted values or with our own predicted values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis has revealed that there is no significant difference among the three sets of predicted values and no statistical difference was detected among the classification of COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is shown that the 3 sets of predicted values are almost identical, despite the fact that they have been collected from different study populations.Αccording to the study, there is no need in recalculating values for Greek population.</p>","PeriodicalId":39127,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"29-38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080060/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spirometric Values of Greek People and Comparison with ECSC and GLI Values in COPD People.\",\"authors\":\"Nikolaos Tatsis,&nbsp;Sotirios Kakavas,&nbsp;Evgenios Metaxas,&nbsp;Evangelos Balis,&nbsp;George Tatsis,&nbsp;Nikolaos Pantazis,&nbsp;Petros Bakakos,&nbsp;Nikolaos Koulouris,&nbsp;Κostantinos Hadjistavrou\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874306401812010029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the past few years, the use of criteria introduced by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) is recommended for the diagnosis and classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD),taking into account the values of a Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 second (FEV1) and a Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 second (FEV1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio. In Europe, the reference values of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), that were originally developed in 1993 are still used.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The study aimed to carry out measurement of spirometric values in a healthy, non smoking Greek population, development of local equations and comparison with ECSC and Global Lung Initiative(GLI) equations, in order to see if there is a need for separate ones in everyday use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Normal predicted values for FEV1 and FEV1/FVC% were obtained from a group of 500 healthy subjects, aged 18-89 years. In addition, a group of 124 COPD patients, with no other comorbidities was studied. Patients were classified according to GOLD criteria in four groups with ECSC, GLI predicted values or with our own predicted values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The statistical analysis has revealed that there is no significant difference among the three sets of predicted values and no statistical difference was detected among the classification of COPD patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is shown that the 3 sets of predicted values are almost identical, despite the fact that they have been collected from different study populations.Αccording to the study, there is no need in recalculating values for Greek population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"29-38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306401812010029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874306401812010029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:在过去几年中,慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)引入的标准被推荐用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的诊断和分类,考虑到1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)和1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)与用力肺活量(FVC)的比值。在欧洲,最初于1993年制定的欧洲煤钢共同体(煤钢共同体)的参考值仍在使用。研究目的:本研究旨在对健康的希腊非吸烟人群进行肺活量测量,开发局部方程,并与ECSC和Global Lung Initiative(GLI)方程进行比较,以确定是否需要在日常使用中单独使用。方法:对500名年龄在18 ~ 89岁的健康人进行FEV1和FEV1/FVC%正常值预测。此外,研究了124名无其他合并症的COPD患者。根据GOLD标准将患者分为四组,分别为ECSC、GLI预测值和我们自己的预测值。结果:经统计分析,三组预测值之间无显著性差异,COPD患者分型之间无统计学差异。结论:虽然这3组预测值来自不同的研究人群,但它们的预测值几乎相同。Αccording对于这项研究,没有必要重新计算希腊人口的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spirometric Values of Greek People and Comparison with ECSC and GLI Values in COPD People.

Background: During the past few years, the use of criteria introduced by Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) is recommended for the diagnosis and classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease(COPD),taking into account the values of a Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 second (FEV1) and a Forced Expiratory Volume In 1 second (FEV1) to Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) ratio. In Europe, the reference values of the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), that were originally developed in 1993 are still used.

Aim of the study: The study aimed to carry out measurement of spirometric values in a healthy, non smoking Greek population, development of local equations and comparison with ECSC and Global Lung Initiative(GLI) equations, in order to see if there is a need for separate ones in everyday use.

Methods: Normal predicted values for FEV1 and FEV1/FVC% were obtained from a group of 500 healthy subjects, aged 18-89 years. In addition, a group of 124 COPD patients, with no other comorbidities was studied. Patients were classified according to GOLD criteria in four groups with ECSC, GLI predicted values or with our own predicted values.

Results: The statistical analysis has revealed that there is no significant difference among the three sets of predicted values and no statistical difference was detected among the classification of COPD patients.

Conclusion: It is shown that the 3 sets of predicted values are almost identical, despite the fact that they have been collected from different study populations.Αccording to the study, there is no need in recalculating values for Greek population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal
Open Respiratory Medicine Journal Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in respiratory medicine. Topics covered include: -COPD- Occupational disorders, and the role of allergens and pollutants- Asthma- Allergy- Non-invasive ventilation- Therapeutic intervention- Lung cancer- Lung infections respiratory diseases- Therapeutic interventions- Adult and paediatric medicine- Cell biology. The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal, a peer reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on important recent developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and making them freely available worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信