静态与搅拌培养液培养金黄色葡萄球菌产率的比较。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2018-07-26 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/1462671
Carol E Muenks, Patrick G Hogan, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Stephanie A Fritz
{"title":"静态与搅拌培养液培养金黄色葡萄球菌产率的比较。","authors":"Carol E Muenks,&nbsp;Patrick G Hogan,&nbsp;Carey-Ann D Burnham,&nbsp;Stephanie A Fritz","doi":"10.1155/2018/1462671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of <i>S. aureus</i> at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of <i>S. aureus</i> was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of <i>S. aureus</i> growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/1462671","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Yield of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation.\",\"authors\":\"Carol E Muenks,&nbsp;Patrick G Hogan,&nbsp;Carey-Ann D Burnham,&nbsp;Stephanie A Fritz\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/1462671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of <i>S. aureus</i> at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of <i>S. aureus</i> was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of <i>S. aureus</i> growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/1462671\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于建筑环境中微生物回收方法缺乏标准化,我们试图比较在搅拌和静态条件下培养时,用肉汤富集法培养金黄色葡萄球菌的产量。对5株不同浓度的金黄色葡萄球菌进行了培养,比较了直接培养、搅拌培养基培养和静态培养基培养方法。所有样品在35°环境空气中孵育。3个重复和5个菌株的最低回收率在培养方法之间没有差异(Fisher精确检验,p=0.50);值得注意的是,金黄色葡萄球菌的回收率在静态和搅拌培养液之间是相同的。当采用肉汤富集(静态和搅拌)时,金黄色葡萄球菌的生长负担(通过四象限条纹的半定量评估)比直接电镀培养法更高。考虑到建筑环境中微生物群落研究的缺乏,优化微生物恢复策略至关重要,特别是在低生物量地区。这项研究的结果与其他研究建筑环境微生物组的实验相结合,可以帮助制定建筑环境中标准化培养方法的协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation.

Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of S. aureus was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of S. aureus growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信