Carol E Muenks, Patrick G Hogan, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Stephanie A Fritz
{"title":"静态与搅拌培养液培养金黄色葡萄球菌产率的比较。","authors":"Carol E Muenks, Patrick G Hogan, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Stephanie A Fritz","doi":"10.1155/2018/1462671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of <i>S. aureus</i> at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of <i>S. aureus</i> was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of <i>S. aureus</i> growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":16788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathogens","volume":"2018 ","pages":"1462671"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/1462671","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the Yield of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation.\",\"authors\":\"Carol E Muenks, Patrick G Hogan, Carey-Ann D Burnham, Stephanie A Fritz\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/1462671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of <i>S. aureus</i> at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of <i>S. aureus</i> was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of <i>S. aureus</i> growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"volume\":\"2018 \",\"pages\":\"1462671\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/1462671\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pathogens\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1462671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparing the Yield of Staphylococcus aureus Recovery with Static versus Agitated Broth Incubation.
Given the lack of standardization of methodologies for microbial recovery from built environments, we sought to compare the yield of Staphylococcus aureus with a broth enrichment method when incubated in agitated versus static conditions. Five unique strains of S. aureus at five different concentrations were cultured to compare direct plating, agitated broth enrichment, and static broth enrichment culture methods. All samples were incubated at 35° in ambient air. The lowest concentration recovered across three replicates and five strains did not differ between culture methods (Fisher's exact test, p=0.50); notably, recovery of S. aureus was equivalent between static and agitated broth incubation. When broth enrichment was used (both static and agitated), the burden of S. aureus growth was higher (by semiquantitative assessment of 4-quadrant streaking) compared to the direct plating culture method. Optimizing strategies for microbial recovery is essential, particularly in areas of lower biomass, given the paucity of research concerning microbial communities of built environments. The results of this study, in conjunction with other experiments investigating microbiomes of built environments, can help inform protocols for standardizing culturing methods within built environments.