数据库衍生的哮喘严重恶化和哮喘控制措施的性能:英国初级保健数据库与关联问卷数据的响应性和预测效用。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2018-08-10 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S151615
Gene Colice, Alison Chisholm, Alexandra L Dima, Helen K Reddel, Annie Burden, Richard J Martin, Guy Brusselle, Todor A Popov, Julie von Ziegenweidt, David B Price
{"title":"数据库衍生的哮喘严重恶化和哮喘控制措施的性能:英国初级保健数据库与关联问卷数据的响应性和预测效用。","authors":"Gene Colice, Alison Chisholm, Alexandra L Dima, Helen K Reddel, Annie Burden, Richard J Martin, Guy Brusselle, Todor A Popov, Julie von Ziegenweidt, David B Price","doi":"10.2147/POR.S151615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational research is essential to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of asthma treatments and can now make use of outcomes derived from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of several database outcome measures in asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study identified cohorts of patients with active asthma from a UK primary care database - Optimum Patient Care Research Database - approximately 10% of which was prospectively supplemented with questionnaire data. The \"Questionnaire cohort\" included patients aged 18-60 years with valid questionnaire data and 1 year of continuous primary care data. Separate \"ICS initiation\" and \"ICS step-up\" cohorts included patients aged 5-60 years initiated on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), who had 1 year of continuous primary care data before, and after, this index visit. Database measures of asthma symptom control and exacerbations were identified in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and cross-tabulated with corresponding patient-reported (questionnaire) data. Responsiveness of the database outcomes was analyzed, using McNemar's and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests, and Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between database outcomes and future risk of database exacerbations, in the ICS initiation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study included 2,366 Questionnaire cohort patients and 51,404 ICS initiation patients. Agreement between patient-reported and database-recorded exacerbations was fair (kappa 0.35). Following the initiation of ICS, database risk domain asthma control (based on exacerbations) improved (proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma decreased from 24.9% to 18.6%; <i>P</i><0.001) and mean number of database exacerbations decreased from 0.09 to 0.08 per patient per year (<i>P</i>=0.001). However, another measure of asthma control which includes short-acting beta-agonist prescription as part of the definition did not show this improvement. Patients with prior exacerbations had a higher risk of future exacerbation (rate ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.23 [3.03-3.57]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asthma control and exacerbations derived from primary care databases were responsive, with the exception of short-acting beta-agonist prescriptions, and useful for risk prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/65/por-9-029.PMC6092127.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance of database-derived severe exacerbations and asthma control measures in asthma: responsiveness and predictive utility in a UK primary care database with linked questionnaire data.\",\"authors\":\"Gene Colice, Alison Chisholm, Alexandra L Dima, Helen K Reddel, Annie Burden, Richard J Martin, Guy Brusselle, Todor A Popov, Julie von Ziegenweidt, David B Price\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S151615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Observational research is essential to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of asthma treatments and can now make use of outcomes derived from electronic medical records.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of several database outcome measures in asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study identified cohorts of patients with active asthma from a UK primary care database - Optimum Patient Care Research Database - approximately 10% of which was prospectively supplemented with questionnaire data. The \\\"Questionnaire cohort\\\" included patients aged 18-60 years with valid questionnaire data and 1 year of continuous primary care data. Separate \\\"ICS initiation\\\" and \\\"ICS step-up\\\" cohorts included patients aged 5-60 years initiated on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), who had 1 year of continuous primary care data before, and after, this index visit. Database measures of asthma symptom control and exacerbations were identified in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and cross-tabulated with corresponding patient-reported (questionnaire) data. Responsiveness of the database outcomes was analyzed, using McNemar's and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests, and Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between database outcomes and future risk of database exacerbations, in the ICS initiation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final study included 2,366 Questionnaire cohort patients and 51,404 ICS initiation patients. Agreement between patient-reported and database-recorded exacerbations was fair (kappa 0.35). Following the initiation of ICS, database risk domain asthma control (based on exacerbations) improved (proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma decreased from 24.9% to 18.6%; <i>P</i><0.001) and mean number of database exacerbations decreased from 0.09 to 0.08 per patient per year (<i>P</i>=0.001). However, another measure of asthma control which includes short-acting beta-agonist prescription as part of the definition did not show this improvement. Patients with prior exacerbations had a higher risk of future exacerbation (rate ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.23 [3.03-3.57]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asthma control and exacerbations derived from primary care databases were responsive, with the exception of short-acting beta-agonist prescriptions, and useful for risk prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b5/65/por-9-029.PMC6092127.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S151615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S151615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察性研究对于评估哮喘治疗的实际效果至关重要,现在可以利用从电子病历中获得的结果:本研究从英国初级医疗数据库--最佳患者护理研究数据库--中确定了活动性哮喘患者队列,其中约 10%的患者前瞻性地补充了问卷调查数据。问卷队列 "包括年龄在 18-60 岁之间、拥有有效问卷数据和 1 年连续初级保健数据的患者。独立的 "开始使用 ICS "和 "逐步使用 ICS "队列包括 5-60 岁开始使用吸入式皮质类固醇(ICS)的患者,这些患者在指标访问前后均有 1 年的连续初级保健数据。在最佳患者护理研究数据库中确定了哮喘症状控制和病情恶化的数据库测量指标,并与相应的患者报告(问卷)数据进行了交叉分析。使用 McNemar 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验分析了数据库结果的响应性,并使用泊松回归估计了开始使用 ICS 的队列中数据库结果与未来数据库恶化风险之间的关联:最终研究包括 2,366 名问卷队列患者和 51,404 名开始使用 ICS 的患者。患者报告的病情加重情况与数据库记录的病情加重情况之间的一致性尚可(kappa 0.35)。开始使用 ICS 后,数据库风险域的哮喘控制情况(基于恶化情况)有所改善(哮喘未得到控制的患者比例从 24.9% 降至 18.6%;PP=0.001)。然而,另一种哮喘控制测量方法(将短效β-激动剂处方作为定义的一部分)并没有显示出这种改善。曾有过病情恶化的患者今后病情恶化的风险更高(比率比[95% 置信区间],3.23 [3.03-3.57]):结论:从初级保健数据库中得出的哮喘控制和病情恶化情况,除短效β-激动剂处方外,都是反应灵敏的,有助于进行风险预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Performance of database-derived severe exacerbations and asthma control measures in asthma: responsiveness and predictive utility in a UK primary care database with linked questionnaire data.

Performance of database-derived severe exacerbations and asthma control measures in asthma: responsiveness and predictive utility in a UK primary care database with linked questionnaire data.

Performance of database-derived severe exacerbations and asthma control measures in asthma: responsiveness and predictive utility in a UK primary care database with linked questionnaire data.

Background: Observational research is essential to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of asthma treatments and can now make use of outcomes derived from electronic medical records.

Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of several database outcome measures in asthma.

Methods: This study identified cohorts of patients with active asthma from a UK primary care database - Optimum Patient Care Research Database - approximately 10% of which was prospectively supplemented with questionnaire data. The "Questionnaire cohort" included patients aged 18-60 years with valid questionnaire data and 1 year of continuous primary care data. Separate "ICS initiation" and "ICS step-up" cohorts included patients aged 5-60 years initiated on inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), who had 1 year of continuous primary care data before, and after, this index visit. Database measures of asthma symptom control and exacerbations were identified in the Optimum Patient Care Research Database and cross-tabulated with corresponding patient-reported (questionnaire) data. Responsiveness of the database outcomes was analyzed, using McNemar's and Wilcoxon's signed rank tests, and Poisson regression was used to estimate the association between database outcomes and future risk of database exacerbations, in the ICS initiation cohort.

Results: The final study included 2,366 Questionnaire cohort patients and 51,404 ICS initiation patients. Agreement between patient-reported and database-recorded exacerbations was fair (kappa 0.35). Following the initiation of ICS, database risk domain asthma control (based on exacerbations) improved (proportion of patients with uncontrolled asthma decreased from 24.9% to 18.6%; P<0.001) and mean number of database exacerbations decreased from 0.09 to 0.08 per patient per year (P=0.001). However, another measure of asthma control which includes short-acting beta-agonist prescription as part of the definition did not show this improvement. Patients with prior exacerbations had a higher risk of future exacerbation (rate ratio [95% confidence interval], 3.23 [3.03-3.57]).

Conclusion: Asthma control and exacerbations derived from primary care databases were responsive, with the exception of short-acting beta-agonist prescriptions, and useful for risk prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信