自杀的从观念到行动理论:概念和经验的更新

IF 6.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E David Klonsky , Boaz Y Saffer , Craig J Bryan
{"title":"自杀的从观念到行动理论:概念和经验的更新","authors":"E David Klonsky ,&nbsp;Boaz Y Saffer ,&nbsp;Craig J Bryan","doi":"10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This review provides a conceptual and empirical update regarding ideation-to-action theories of suicide. These theories<!--> <!-->—<!--> <!-->including the interpersonal theory (IPTS), integrated motivational–volitional model (IMV), three-step theory (3ST), and fluid vulnerability theory (FVT)<!--> <!-->—<!--> <!-->agree that, firstly, the development of suicidal ideation and secondly, the progression from suicide desire to attempts are distinct processes with distinct explanations. At the same time, these theories have some substantive differences. A literature review indicates that the IPTS has received extensive examination, whereas evidence has only begun to accumulate for the other theories. Based on current evidence, we offer three inferences. First, the capability for suicide meaningfully distinguishes those who have attempted suicide (attempters) from those with suicidal desire who have not attempted (ideators). This encouraging finding is broadly consistent with the IPTS, IMV, and 3ST. The nature and measurement of capability warrant further attention. Second, consistent with the 3ST, accumulating evidence suggests that pain and hopelessness motivate suicidal desire more than other factors. Third, the FVT, which is largely compatible with other theories, may be best equipped to explain the non-linear time-course of suicidal ideation and attempts. Longitudinal studies over various time-frames (minutes, hours, days, weeks, months) are necessary to further evaluate and elaborate ideation-to-action theories of suicide.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48279,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychology","volume":"22 ","pages":"Pages 38-43"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.020","citationCount":"310","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update\",\"authors\":\"E David Klonsky ,&nbsp;Boaz Y Saffer ,&nbsp;Craig J Bryan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This review provides a conceptual and empirical update regarding ideation-to-action theories of suicide. These theories<!--> <!-->—<!--> <!-->including the interpersonal theory (IPTS), integrated motivational–volitional model (IMV), three-step theory (3ST), and fluid vulnerability theory (FVT)<!--> <!-->—<!--> <!-->agree that, firstly, the development of suicidal ideation and secondly, the progression from suicide desire to attempts are distinct processes with distinct explanations. At the same time, these theories have some substantive differences. A literature review indicates that the IPTS has received extensive examination, whereas evidence has only begun to accumulate for the other theories. Based on current evidence, we offer three inferences. First, the capability for suicide meaningfully distinguishes those who have attempted suicide (attempters) from those with suicidal desire who have not attempted (ideators). This encouraging finding is broadly consistent with the IPTS, IMV, and 3ST. The nature and measurement of capability warrant further attention. Second, consistent with the 3ST, accumulating evidence suggests that pain and hopelessness motivate suicidal desire more than other factors. Third, the FVT, which is largely compatible with other theories, may be best equipped to explain the non-linear time-course of suicidal ideation and attempts. Longitudinal studies over various time-frames (minutes, hours, days, weeks, months) are necessary to further evaluate and elaborate ideation-to-action theories of suicide.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 38-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.020\",\"citationCount\":\"310\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X17301835\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352250X17301835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 310

摘要

这篇综述提供了关于自杀的观念到行动理论的概念和经验更新。这些理论——包括人际关系理论(IPTS)、动机-意志综合模型(IMV)、三步理论(3ST)和流动脆弱性理论(FVT)——一致认为,首先,自杀意念的发展,其次,从自杀欲望到自杀企图的进展是不同的过程,有不同的解释。同时,这些理论也存在着一些实质性的差异。一篇文献综述表明,IPTS已经得到了广泛的检验,而其他理论的证据才刚刚开始积累。根据目前的证据,我们提供了三个推论。首先,自杀的能力有意义地区分了那些有自杀企图的人(企图者)和那些有自杀欲望的人(未企图者)。这一令人鼓舞的发现与IPTS、IMV和3ST大体一致。能力的性质和度量值得进一步注意。第二,与3ST一致,越来越多的证据表明,痛苦和绝望比其他因素更能激发自杀欲望。第三,在很大程度上与其他理论兼容的FVT,可能最适合解释自杀意念和企图的非线性时间过程。在不同时间范围内(分钟、小时、天、周、月)进行纵向研究,对于进一步评估和阐述自杀的“从想法到行动”理论是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ideation-to-action theories of suicide: a conceptual and empirical update

This review provides a conceptual and empirical update regarding ideation-to-action theories of suicide. These theories  including the interpersonal theory (IPTS), integrated motivational–volitional model (IMV), three-step theory (3ST), and fluid vulnerability theory (FVT)  agree that, firstly, the development of suicidal ideation and secondly, the progression from suicide desire to attempts are distinct processes with distinct explanations. At the same time, these theories have some substantive differences. A literature review indicates that the IPTS has received extensive examination, whereas evidence has only begun to accumulate for the other theories. Based on current evidence, we offer three inferences. First, the capability for suicide meaningfully distinguishes those who have attempted suicide (attempters) from those with suicidal desire who have not attempted (ideators). This encouraging finding is broadly consistent with the IPTS, IMV, and 3ST. The nature and measurement of capability warrant further attention. Second, consistent with the 3ST, accumulating evidence suggests that pain and hopelessness motivate suicidal desire more than other factors. Third, the FVT, which is largely compatible with other theories, may be best equipped to explain the non-linear time-course of suicidal ideation and attempts. Longitudinal studies over various time-frames (minutes, hours, days, weeks, months) are necessary to further evaluate and elaborate ideation-to-action theories of suicide.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychology
Current Opinion in Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.40%
发文量
293
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychology is part of the Current Opinion and Research (CO+RE) suite of journals and is a companion to the primary research, open access journal, Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. CO+RE journals leverage the Current Opinion legacy of editorial excellence, high-impact, and global reach to ensure they are a widely-read resource that is integral to scientists' workflows. Current Opinion in Psychology is divided into themed sections, some of which may be reviewed on an annual basis if appropriate. The amount of space devoted to each section is related to its importance. The topics covered will include: * Biological psychology * Clinical psychology * Cognitive psychology * Community psychology * Comparative psychology * Developmental psychology * Educational psychology * Environmental psychology * Evolutionary psychology * Health psychology * Neuropsychology * Personality psychology * Social psychology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信