LASIK和SMILE治疗近视和近视散光后角膜生物力学特性的研究进展。

IF 0.4 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Open Ophthalmology Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-27 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874364101812010164
Iben Bach Damgaard, Mohamed Reffat, Jesper Hjortdal
{"title":"LASIK和SMILE治疗近视和近视散光后角膜生物力学特性的研究进展。","authors":"Iben Bach Damgaard,&nbsp;Mohamed Reffat,&nbsp;Jesper Hjortdal","doi":"10.2174/1874364101812010164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worldwide, femtosecond Laser Assisted <i>In-situ</i> Keratomileusis (LASIK) is a well known and commonly used refractive technique, although Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) has become increasingly popular since it was introduced in 2011. In LASIK, a corneal flap is cut with a microkeratome or femtosecond laser, followed by thinning of the stromal bed with excimer laser ablation. In SMILE, a minor intrastromal lenticule is cut with a femtosecond laser and subsequently removed through a small incision, leaving the anterior and strongest part of the cornea almost intact. Both LASIK and SMILE require cutting of corneal lamellae that may reduce the biomechanical stability of the cornea, with the potential risk of corneal iatrogenic ectasia as a severe complication. However, SMILE preserves the anterior corneal integrity and may, in theory, better preserve the corneal biomechanical strength than LASIK after surgery. A review aimed to examine the current literature that describes and compares the corneal biomechanical properties after Laser Assisted <i>In-situ</i> Keratomileusis (LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed.gov using the following search queries: Corneal biomechanical properties, corneal biomechanics, ocular response analyser, ocular response analyzer, ORA, <i>ex vivo, in vitro</i>, Corvis, Corvis ST, LASIK, and SMILE.</p>","PeriodicalId":46347,"journal":{"name":"Open Ophthalmology Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874364101812010164","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.\",\"authors\":\"Iben Bach Damgaard,&nbsp;Mohamed Reffat,&nbsp;Jesper Hjortdal\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874364101812010164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Worldwide, femtosecond Laser Assisted <i>In-situ</i> Keratomileusis (LASIK) is a well known and commonly used refractive technique, although Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) has become increasingly popular since it was introduced in 2011. In LASIK, a corneal flap is cut with a microkeratome or femtosecond laser, followed by thinning of the stromal bed with excimer laser ablation. In SMILE, a minor intrastromal lenticule is cut with a femtosecond laser and subsequently removed through a small incision, leaving the anterior and strongest part of the cornea almost intact. Both LASIK and SMILE require cutting of corneal lamellae that may reduce the biomechanical stability of the cornea, with the potential risk of corneal iatrogenic ectasia as a severe complication. However, SMILE preserves the anterior corneal integrity and may, in theory, better preserve the corneal biomechanical strength than LASIK after surgery. A review aimed to examine the current literature that describes and compares the corneal biomechanical properties after Laser Assisted <i>In-situ</i> Keratomileusis (LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed.gov using the following search queries: Corneal biomechanical properties, corneal biomechanics, ocular response analyser, ocular response analyzer, ORA, <i>ex vivo, in vitro</i>, Corvis, Corvis ST, LASIK, and SMILE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Ophthalmology Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2174/1874364101812010164\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Ophthalmology Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Ophthalmology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364101812010164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

在世界范围内,飞秒激光辅助原位角膜磨砂术(LASIK)是一种众所周知且常用的屈光技术,尽管小切口角膜磨砂术(SMILE)自2011年推出以来越来越受欢迎。在LASIK手术中,用微角刀或飞秒激光切割角膜瓣,然后用准分子激光消融使基质层变薄。在SMILE手术中,用飞秒激光切割一个小的角膜间小晶状体,然后通过一个小切口切除,使角膜的前部和最坚固的部分几乎完好无损。LASIK和SMILE都需要切割角膜板,这可能会降低角膜的生物力学稳定性,角膜医源性扩张的潜在风险是一个严重的并发症。然而,SMILE保留了前角膜的完整性,并且在理论上可能比LASIK手术更好地保留了术后角膜的生物力学强度。本文综述了激光辅助原位角膜磨除术(LASIK)和小切口晶状体摘除术(SMILE)后角膜生物力学特性的相关文献。我们在Pubmed.gov网站上进行了全面的检索,检索词包括:角膜生物力学特性、角膜生物力学、眼反应分析仪、眼反应分析仪、ORA、离体、体外、Corvis、Corvis ST、LASIK和SMILE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

Review of Corneal Biomechanical Properties Following LASIK and SMILE for Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

Worldwide, femtosecond Laser Assisted In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) is a well known and commonly used refractive technique, although Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) has become increasingly popular since it was introduced in 2011. In LASIK, a corneal flap is cut with a microkeratome or femtosecond laser, followed by thinning of the stromal bed with excimer laser ablation. In SMILE, a minor intrastromal lenticule is cut with a femtosecond laser and subsequently removed through a small incision, leaving the anterior and strongest part of the cornea almost intact. Both LASIK and SMILE require cutting of corneal lamellae that may reduce the biomechanical stability of the cornea, with the potential risk of corneal iatrogenic ectasia as a severe complication. However, SMILE preserves the anterior corneal integrity and may, in theory, better preserve the corneal biomechanical strength than LASIK after surgery. A review aimed to examine the current literature that describes and compares the corneal biomechanical properties after Laser Assisted In-situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). A comprehensive search was performed in Pubmed.gov using the following search queries: Corneal biomechanical properties, corneal biomechanics, ocular response analyser, ocular response analyzer, ORA, ex vivo, in vitro, Corvis, Corvis ST, LASIK, and SMILE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Open Ophthalmology Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited single topic issues in all important areas of experimental and clinical research in ophthalmology, including use of ophthalmological therapies, devices and surgical techniques. The Open Ophthalmology Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and making them freely available to researchers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信