推广“抓斗”作为减少灾害风险的战略。

Christina J Pickering, Tracey L O'Sullivan, Alessia Morris, Carman Mark, David McQuirk, Emily Yy Chan, Emily Guy, Gloria Kw Chan, Karen Reddin, Ralph Throp, Shinya Tsuzuki, Tiffany Yeung, Virginia Murray
{"title":"推广“抓斗”作为减少灾害风险的战略。","authors":"Christina J Pickering,&nbsp;Tracey L O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Alessia Morris,&nbsp;Carman Mark,&nbsp;David McQuirk,&nbsp;Emily Yy Chan,&nbsp;Emily Guy,&nbsp;Gloria Kw Chan,&nbsp;Karen Reddin,&nbsp;Ralph Throp,&nbsp;Shinya Tsuzuki,&nbsp;Tiffany Yeung,&nbsp;Virginia Murray","doi":"10.1371/currents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An all-of-society approach to disaster risk reduction emphasizes inclusion and engagement in preparedness activities. A common recommendation is to promote household preparedness through the preparation of a 'grab bag' or 'disaster kit', that can be used to shelter-in-place or evacuate. However, there are knowledge gaps related to how this strategy is being used around the world as a disaster risk reduction strategy, and what evidence there is to support recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this paper, we present an exploratory study undertaken to provide insight into how grab bag guidelines are used to promote preparedness in Canada, China, England, Japan, and Scotland, and supplemented by a literature review to understand existing evidence for this strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are gaps in the literature regarding evidence on grab bag effectiveness. We also found variations in how grab bag guidelines are promoted across the five case studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong> While there are clearly common items recommended for household grab bags (such as water and first aid kits), there are gaps in the literature regarding: 1) the evidence base to inform guidelines; 2) uptake of guidelines; and 3) to what extent grab bags reduce demands on essential services and improve disaster resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":74464,"journal":{"name":"PLoS currents","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050054/pdf/","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Promotion of 'Grab Bags' as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.\",\"authors\":\"Christina J Pickering,&nbsp;Tracey L O'Sullivan,&nbsp;Alessia Morris,&nbsp;Carman Mark,&nbsp;David McQuirk,&nbsp;Emily Yy Chan,&nbsp;Emily Guy,&nbsp;Gloria Kw Chan,&nbsp;Karen Reddin,&nbsp;Ralph Throp,&nbsp;Shinya Tsuzuki,&nbsp;Tiffany Yeung,&nbsp;Virginia Murray\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/currents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An all-of-society approach to disaster risk reduction emphasizes inclusion and engagement in preparedness activities. A common recommendation is to promote household preparedness through the preparation of a 'grab bag' or 'disaster kit', that can be used to shelter-in-place or evacuate. However, there are knowledge gaps related to how this strategy is being used around the world as a disaster risk reduction strategy, and what evidence there is to support recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this paper, we present an exploratory study undertaken to provide insight into how grab bag guidelines are used to promote preparedness in Canada, China, England, Japan, and Scotland, and supplemented by a literature review to understand existing evidence for this strategy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There are gaps in the literature regarding evidence on grab bag effectiveness. We also found variations in how grab bag guidelines are promoted across the five case studies.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong> While there are clearly common items recommended for household grab bags (such as water and first aid kits), there are gaps in the literature regarding: 1) the evidence base to inform guidelines; 2) uptake of guidelines; and 3) to what extent grab bags reduce demands on essential services and improve disaster resilience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS currents\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6050054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS currents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS currents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

导言:减少灾害风险的全社会办法强调包容和参与备灾活动。一个常见的建议是通过准备一个可用于就地避难或疏散的“抓包”或“灾害工具包”来促进家庭做好准备。然而,在世界各地如何将这一战略用作减少灾害风险战略,以及有什么证据支持这些建议方面,仍存在知识差距。方法:在本文中,我们进行了一项探索性研究,以深入了解加拿大、中国、英国、日本和苏格兰如何使用抓包指南来促进准备工作,并辅以文献综述,以了解该策略的现有证据。结果:关于抓握袋有效性的证据,文献中存在空白。我们还发现,在五个案例研究中,抓包指南的推广方式各不相同。讨论:虽然有明确的常见物品推荐用于家庭抓包(如水和急救包),但文献中存在以下方面的空白:1)指导方针的证据基础;2) 接受指导方针;以及3)在多大程度上减少了对基本服务的需求并提高了抗灾能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Promotion of 'Grab Bags' as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.

The Promotion of 'Grab Bags' as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.

The Promotion of 'Grab Bags' as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.

The Promotion of 'Grab Bags' as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.

Introduction: An all-of-society approach to disaster risk reduction emphasizes inclusion and engagement in preparedness activities. A common recommendation is to promote household preparedness through the preparation of a 'grab bag' or 'disaster kit', that can be used to shelter-in-place or evacuate. However, there are knowledge gaps related to how this strategy is being used around the world as a disaster risk reduction strategy, and what evidence there is to support recommendations.

Methods: In this paper, we present an exploratory study undertaken to provide insight into how grab bag guidelines are used to promote preparedness in Canada, China, England, Japan, and Scotland, and supplemented by a literature review to understand existing evidence for this strategy.

Results: There are gaps in the literature regarding evidence on grab bag effectiveness. We also found variations in how grab bag guidelines are promoted across the five case studies.

Discussion:  While there are clearly common items recommended for household grab bags (such as water and first aid kits), there are gaps in the literature regarding: 1) the evidence base to inform guidelines; 2) uptake of guidelines; and 3) to what extent grab bags reduce demands on essential services and improve disaster resilience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信