ICU 护士对有效肠内营养实践的认知障碍:一项多中心调查研究。

Q3 Nursing
Open Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2018-05-25 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.2174/1874434601812010067
Muhammad W Darawad, Nedal Alfasfos, Ismael Zaki, Malek Alnajar, Sawsan Hammad, Osama A Samarkandi
{"title":"ICU 护士对有效肠内营养实践的认知障碍:一项多中心调查研究。","authors":"Muhammad W Darawad, Nedal Alfasfos, Ismael Zaki, Malek Alnajar, Sawsan Hammad, Osama A Samarkandi","doi":"10.2174/1874434601812010067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients are hypermetabolic and have increased energy requirements, making nutritional support a vital intervention. In the Intensive Care Units, enteral nutrition is based on opinions rather than evidence-based practices. Therefore, there is a need to identify the barriers to evidence based practice protocols for enteral feeding of patients in Jordanian ICUs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore Jordanian ICU nurses' perceived barriers for enteral nutrition that hinders them from utilizing the recommended EN guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized using self-administered questionnaire. A total of 131 nurses participated from different hospitals representing different healthcare sectors in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five barriers subscales' means were almost equal ranging from 4.04 (Delivery of EN to the Patient) to 4.33 (ICU Resources) (out of 7). The most important barrier was \"Not enough nursing staff to deliver adequate nutrition\" (M=4.80, SD=1.81, 60%), followed by \"Fear of adverse events due to aggressively feeding patients\" (M= 4.59, SD=1.50, 56%). Although no significant differences in the mean barrier score were revealed, minimal significant differences were revealed that were distributed among different barrier subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants moderately perceived barriers with more focus on insufficient resources in ICU and among healthcare providers. Such barriers are modifiable and manageable, making their identification and management crucial for optimal patient care. This study confirms that enteral nutrition is a multidisciplinary responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":38868,"journal":{"name":"Open Nursing Journal","volume":"12 ","pages":"67-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICU Nurses' Perceived Barriers to Effective Enteral Nutrition Practices: A Multicenter Survey Study.\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad W Darawad, Nedal Alfasfos, Ismael Zaki, Malek Alnajar, Sawsan Hammad, Osama A Samarkandi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/1874434601812010067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients are hypermetabolic and have increased energy requirements, making nutritional support a vital intervention. In the Intensive Care Units, enteral nutrition is based on opinions rather than evidence-based practices. Therefore, there is a need to identify the barriers to evidence based practice protocols for enteral feeding of patients in Jordanian ICUs.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To explore Jordanian ICU nurses' perceived barriers for enteral nutrition that hinders them from utilizing the recommended EN guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized using self-administered questionnaire. A total of 131 nurses participated from different hospitals representing different healthcare sectors in Jordan.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five barriers subscales' means were almost equal ranging from 4.04 (Delivery of EN to the Patient) to 4.33 (ICU Resources) (out of 7). The most important barrier was \\\"Not enough nursing staff to deliver adequate nutrition\\\" (M=4.80, SD=1.81, 60%), followed by \\\"Fear of adverse events due to aggressively feeding patients\\\" (M= 4.59, SD=1.50, 56%). Although no significant differences in the mean barrier score were revealed, minimal significant differences were revealed that were distributed among different barrier subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Participants moderately perceived barriers with more focus on insufficient resources in ICU and among healthcare providers. Such barriers are modifiable and manageable, making their identification and management crucial for optimal patient care. This study confirms that enteral nutrition is a multidisciplinary responsibility.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"67-75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5997852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601812010067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874434601812010067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重症患者代谢旺盛,对能量的需求增加,因此营养支持是一项至关重要的干预措施。在重症监护病房,肠内营养是基于意见而非循证实践。因此,有必要确定约旦重症监护病房患者肠内喂养循证实践规程的障碍。目的:探讨约旦重症监护病房护士认为肠内营养存在的障碍,这些障碍阻碍她们使用推荐的 EN 指南:采用描述性横断面设计,自填问卷。共有 131 名护士参加了调查,他们来自约旦不同的医院,代表了不同的医疗保健部门:五个障碍分量表的平均值几乎相等,从 4.04(向患者提供 EN)到 4.33(ICU 资源)(满分 7 分)不等。最重要的障碍是 "没有足够的护理人员为患者提供充足的营养"(M=4.80,SD=1.81,60%),其次是 "担心积极喂养患者会导致不良事件"(M=4.59,SD=1.50,56%)。虽然平均障碍得分没有明显差异,但不同障碍分量表之间的差异极小:结论:参与者对障碍的感知程度一般,主要集中在重症监护室和医疗服务提供者的资源不足上。这些障碍是可以改变和管理的,因此识别和管理这些障碍对于优化患者护理至关重要。这项研究证实,肠内营养是一项多学科的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ICU Nurses' Perceived Barriers to Effective Enteral Nutrition Practices: A Multicenter Survey Study.

Background: Critically ill patients are hypermetabolic and have increased energy requirements, making nutritional support a vital intervention. In the Intensive Care Units, enteral nutrition is based on opinions rather than evidence-based practices. Therefore, there is a need to identify the barriers to evidence based practice protocols for enteral feeding of patients in Jordanian ICUs.

Aims: To explore Jordanian ICU nurses' perceived barriers for enteral nutrition that hinders them from utilizing the recommended EN guidelines.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional design was utilized using self-administered questionnaire. A total of 131 nurses participated from different hospitals representing different healthcare sectors in Jordan.

Results: The five barriers subscales' means were almost equal ranging from 4.04 (Delivery of EN to the Patient) to 4.33 (ICU Resources) (out of 7). The most important barrier was "Not enough nursing staff to deliver adequate nutrition" (M=4.80, SD=1.81, 60%), followed by "Fear of adverse events due to aggressively feeding patients" (M= 4.59, SD=1.50, 56%). Although no significant differences in the mean barrier score were revealed, minimal significant differences were revealed that were distributed among different barrier subscales.

Conclusion: Participants moderately perceived barriers with more focus on insufficient resources in ICU and among healthcare providers. Such barriers are modifiable and manageable, making their identification and management crucial for optimal patient care. This study confirms that enteral nutrition is a multidisciplinary responsibility.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Nursing Journal
Open Nursing Journal Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: The Open Nursing Journal is an Open Access online journal, which publishes research articles, reviews/mini-reviews, letters and guest edited thematic issues in all areas of nursing. The Open Nursing Journal, a peer-reviewed journal, is an important and reliable source of current information on developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality papers rapidly and freely available to researchers worldwide. We welcome papers related to nursing and midwifery, with specific relevance to health care practice, policy and research. We publish under the following themes: -Nursing and Midwifery practice -Education -Research methodology -Evidence based practice -New role in practice -Systematic reviews -Case studies -Ethical and professional issues -Management in health care -Sustainability in health and health care provision All authors should make clear how the implications of their paper for nursing, midwifery and health care practice. They should also clearly identify the ‘take home message’ from their paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信