RECIST联合肿瘤标志物评价晚期肝癌肝动脉输注化疗疗效。

Q4 Medicine
Masahiro Hatooka, Tomokazu Kawaoka, Hiroshi Aikata, Fumi Honda, Yuki Nakamura, Norihito Nakano, Kei Morio, Takayuki Fukuhara, Tomoki Kobayashi, Yuko Nagaoki, Masataka Tsuge, Akira Hiramatsu, Michio Imamura, Yoshiiku Kawakami, Kazuo Awai, Kazuaki Chayama
{"title":"RECIST联合肿瘤标志物评价晚期肝癌肝动脉输注化疗疗效。","authors":"Masahiro Hatooka,&nbsp;Tomokazu Kawaoka,&nbsp;Hiroshi Aikata,&nbsp;Fumi Honda,&nbsp;Yuki Nakamura,&nbsp;Norihito Nakano,&nbsp;Kei Morio,&nbsp;Takayuki Fukuhara,&nbsp;Tomoki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yuko Nagaoki,&nbsp;Masataka Tsuge,&nbsp;Akira Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Michio Imamura,&nbsp;Yoshiiku Kawakami,&nbsp;Kazuo Awai,&nbsp;Kazuaki Chayama","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the outcome of stable disease (SD) patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by tumor markers after the first course of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). The study subjects were 156 HCC patients treated with HAIC and classified as Child Pugh A, with no extrahepatic metastasis, and no history of sorafenib treatment. In the study and validation cohorts, the AFP and DCP ratios of patients who were considered SD to the first course of HAIC were analyzed by AUROC for a prediction of response to the second course of HAIC. The imaging response to the first course of HAIC was classified as partial response (PR), SD and progressive disease (PD) in 29 (18.8%), 80 (51.9%), and 44 (28.6%) patients respectively. For SD patients, the a-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-y-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) ratios of patients who were considered SD to the first course of HAIC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of response to the second course of HAIC in the study cohorts. The area under the curve of AFP ratio was 0.743. The area under the curve of DCP ratio was 0.695. The cut-off values of AFP and DCP ratios were 1.3 and 1.0, respectively. In the validation cohort, the accuracy of the prediction of response in this validation cohort (71.4%) showed no significant difference compared to that in the study cohort (72.4%) (p = 1.0). The results suggested that patients with a high tumor marker ratio could be switched to alternative therapeutic regimens despite the SD response to HAIC.</p>","PeriodicalId":12860,"journal":{"name":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","volume":"65 2","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Outcome of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma by the Combination of RECIST and Tumor Markers.\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Hatooka,&nbsp;Tomokazu Kawaoka,&nbsp;Hiroshi Aikata,&nbsp;Fumi Honda,&nbsp;Yuki Nakamura,&nbsp;Norihito Nakano,&nbsp;Kei Morio,&nbsp;Takayuki Fukuhara,&nbsp;Tomoki Kobayashi,&nbsp;Yuko Nagaoki,&nbsp;Masataka Tsuge,&nbsp;Akira Hiramatsu,&nbsp;Michio Imamura,&nbsp;Yoshiiku Kawakami,&nbsp;Kazuo Awai,&nbsp;Kazuaki Chayama\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the outcome of stable disease (SD) patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by tumor markers after the first course of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). The study subjects were 156 HCC patients treated with HAIC and classified as Child Pugh A, with no extrahepatic metastasis, and no history of sorafenib treatment. In the study and validation cohorts, the AFP and DCP ratios of patients who were considered SD to the first course of HAIC were analyzed by AUROC for a prediction of response to the second course of HAIC. The imaging response to the first course of HAIC was classified as partial response (PR), SD and progressive disease (PD) in 29 (18.8%), 80 (51.9%), and 44 (28.6%) patients respectively. For SD patients, the a-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-y-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) ratios of patients who were considered SD to the first course of HAIC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of response to the second course of HAIC in the study cohorts. The area under the curve of AFP ratio was 0.743. The area under the curve of DCP ratio was 0.695. The cut-off values of AFP and DCP ratios were 1.3 and 1.0, respectively. In the validation cohort, the accuracy of the prediction of response in this validation cohort (71.4%) showed no significant difference compared to that in the study cohort (72.4%) (p = 1.0). The results suggested that patients with a high tumor marker ratio could be switched to alternative therapeutic regimens despite the SD response to HAIC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences\",\"volume\":\"65 2\",\"pages\":\"25-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hiroshima journal of medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的通过肿瘤标志物评价病情稳定(SD)晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者首个疗程肝动脉输注化疗(HAIC)后的预后。研究对象为156例接受HAIC治疗的HCC患者,分类为Child Pugh A,无肝外转移,无索拉非尼治疗史。在研究和验证队列中,通过AUROC分析被认为是第一个HAIC疗程的SD患者的AFP和DCP比率,以预测对第二个HAIC疗程的反应。HAIC首个疗程的影像学反应分为部分缓解(PR)、SD和进展性疾病(PD),分别为29例(18.8%)、80例(51.9%)和44例(28.6%)。对于SD患者,通过受试者工作特征曲线分析认为SD患者与HAIC第一疗程患者的a-胎蛋白(AFP)和去羧基凝血酶原(DCP)比值,预测研究队列中患者对HAIC第二疗程的反应。AFP比值曲线下面积为0.743。DCP比曲线下面积为0.695。AFP和DCP比值的临界值分别为1.3和1.0。在验证队列中,该验证队列对反应的预测准确率(71.4%)与研究队列(72.4%)无显著差异(p = 1.0)。结果表明,尽管对HAIC有SD反应,但肿瘤标志物比率高的患者可以切换到替代治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of Outcome of Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma by the Combination of RECIST and Tumor Markers.

To assess the outcome of stable disease (SD) patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by tumor markers after the first course of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC). The study subjects were 156 HCC patients treated with HAIC and classified as Child Pugh A, with no extrahepatic metastasis, and no history of sorafenib treatment. In the study and validation cohorts, the AFP and DCP ratios of patients who were considered SD to the first course of HAIC were analyzed by AUROC for a prediction of response to the second course of HAIC. The imaging response to the first course of HAIC was classified as partial response (PR), SD and progressive disease (PD) in 29 (18.8%), 80 (51.9%), and 44 (28.6%) patients respectively. For SD patients, the a-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-y-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) ratios of patients who were considered SD to the first course of HAIC were analyzed by the receiver operating characteristic curve for prediction of response to the second course of HAIC in the study cohorts. The area under the curve of AFP ratio was 0.743. The area under the curve of DCP ratio was 0.695. The cut-off values of AFP and DCP ratios were 1.3 and 1.0, respectively. In the validation cohort, the accuracy of the prediction of response in this validation cohort (71.4%) showed no significant difference compared to that in the study cohort (72.4%) (p = 1.0). The results suggested that patients with a high tumor marker ratio could be switched to alternative therapeutic regimens despite the SD response to HAIC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences
Hiroshima journal of medical sciences Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信