伪装测试:关于标准化简短版本的建议

Q4 Medicine
Mar Fernández-Modamio, Marta Arrieta-Rodríguez, Rosario Bengochea-Seco, Iciar Santacoloma-Cabero, Juan Gómez de Tojeiro-Roce, Bárbara García-Polavieja, Eduardo González-Fraile, Manuel Martín-Carrasco, Kim Griffin, David Gil-Sanz
{"title":"伪装测试:关于标准化简短版本的建议","authors":"Mar Fernández-Modamio, Marta Arrieta-Rodríguez, Rosario Bengochea-Seco, Iciar Santacoloma-Cabero, Juan Gómez de Tojeiro-Roce, Bárbara García-Polavieja, Eduardo González-Fraile, Manuel Martín-Carrasco, Kim Griffin, David Gil-Sanz","doi":"10.3371/CSRP.FEAR.061518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research on theory of mind suggests that people with schizophrenia have difficulties with complex mentalization tasks that involve the integration of cognition and affective mental states. One of the tools most commonly used to assess theory of mind is the Faux-Pas Test. However, it presents two main methodological problems: 1) the lack of a standard scoring system; 2) the different versions are not comparable due to a lack of information on the stories used. These methodological problems make it difficult to draw conclusions about performance on this test by people with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to develop a reduced version of the Faux-Pas test with adequate psychometric properties. The test was administered to control and clinical groups. Interrater and test-retest reliability were analyzed for each story in order to select the set of 10 stories included in the final reduced version. The shortened version showed good psychometric properties for controls and patients: test-retest reliability of 0.97 and 0.78, inter-rater reliability of 0.95 and 0.87 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.82 and 0.72.</p>","PeriodicalId":40019,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faux-Pas Test: A Proposal of a Standardized Short Version.\",\"authors\":\"Mar Fernández-Modamio, Marta Arrieta-Rodríguez, Rosario Bengochea-Seco, Iciar Santacoloma-Cabero, Juan Gómez de Tojeiro-Roce, Bárbara García-Polavieja, Eduardo González-Fraile, Manuel Martín-Carrasco, Kim Griffin, David Gil-Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.3371/CSRP.FEAR.061518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research on theory of mind suggests that people with schizophrenia have difficulties with complex mentalization tasks that involve the integration of cognition and affective mental states. One of the tools most commonly used to assess theory of mind is the Faux-Pas Test. However, it presents two main methodological problems: 1) the lack of a standard scoring system; 2) the different versions are not comparable due to a lack of information on the stories used. These methodological problems make it difficult to draw conclusions about performance on this test by people with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to develop a reduced version of the Faux-Pas test with adequate psychometric properties. The test was administered to control and clinical groups. Interrater and test-retest reliability were analyzed for each story in order to select the set of 10 stories included in the final reduced version. The shortened version showed good psychometric properties for controls and patients: test-retest reliability of 0.97 and 0.78, inter-rater reliability of 0.95 and 0.87 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.82 and 0.72.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.FEAR.061518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3371/CSRP.FEAR.061518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往有关心智理论的研究表明,精神分裂症患者在完成涉及认知和情感心理状态整合的复杂心智化任务时会遇到困难。假想测验(Faux-Pas Test)是最常用于评估心智理论的工具之一。然而,该测试在方法上存在两个主要问题:1)缺乏标准的评分系统;2)由于缺乏所使用故事的相关信息,不同版本的测试结果不具有可比性。由于这些方法上的问题,很难就精神分裂症患者在该测试中的表现得出结论。本研究的目的是开发一个具有适当心理测量特性的简化版假想测验。该测试在对照组和临床组中进行。对每个故事进行了互测和重测信度分析,以选出最终简化版中的 10 个故事。简化版测试在对照组和患者中均显示出良好的心理测量特性:测试重复信度分别为 0.97 和 0.78,评分者间信度分别为 0.95 和 0.87,克朗巴赫α分别为 0.82 和 0.72。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Faux-Pas Test: A Proposal of a Standardized Short Version.

Previous research on theory of mind suggests that people with schizophrenia have difficulties with complex mentalization tasks that involve the integration of cognition and affective mental states. One of the tools most commonly used to assess theory of mind is the Faux-Pas Test. However, it presents two main methodological problems: 1) the lack of a standard scoring system; 2) the different versions are not comparable due to a lack of information on the stories used. These methodological problems make it difficult to draw conclusions about performance on this test by people with schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to develop a reduced version of the Faux-Pas test with adequate psychometric properties. The test was administered to control and clinical groups. Interrater and test-retest reliability were analyzed for each story in order to select the set of 10 stories included in the final reduced version. The shortened version showed good psychometric properties for controls and patients: test-retest reliability of 0.97 and 0.78, inter-rater reliability of 0.95 and 0.87 and Cronbach's alpha of 0.82 and 0.72.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses
Clinical Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The vision of the exciting new peer-reviewed quarterly publication Clinical Schizophrenia & Related Psychoses (CS) is to provide psychiatrists and other healthcare professionals with the latest research and advances in the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia and related psychoses. CS is a practice-oriented publication focused exclusively on the newest research findings, guidelines, treatment protocols, and clinical trials relevant to patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信