创伤性脑损伤的成对正序离群点检测。

Matt Higger, Martha Shenton, Sylvain Bouix
{"title":"创伤性脑损伤的成对正序离群点检测。","authors":"Matt Higger, Martha Shenton, Sylvain Bouix","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because mild Traumatic Brain Injuries (mTBI) are heterogeneous, classification methods perform outlier detection from a model of healthy tissue. Such a model is challenging to construct. Instead, we utilize region-specific pairwise (person-to-person) comparisons. Each person-region is characterized by a distribution of Fractional Anisotropy and comparisons are made via Median, Mean, Bhattacharya and Kullback-Liebler distances. Additionally, we examine an ordinal decision rule which compares a subject's n<sup>th</sup> most atypical region to a healthy control's. Ordinal comparison is motivated by mTBI's heterogeneity; each mTBI has some set of damaged tissue which is not necessarily spatially consistent. These improvements correctly distinguish Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms in a small dataset but achieve only a .74 AUC in identifying mTBI subjects with milder symptoms. Finally, we perform subject-specific simulations which characterize which injuries are detected and which are missed.</p>","PeriodicalId":72455,"journal":{"name":"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004828/pdf/nihms956808.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pairwise, Ordinal Outlier Detection of Traumatic Brain Injuries.\",\"authors\":\"Matt Higger, Martha Shenton, Sylvain Bouix\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Because mild Traumatic Brain Injuries (mTBI) are heterogeneous, classification methods perform outlier detection from a model of healthy tissue. Such a model is challenging to construct. Instead, we utilize region-specific pairwise (person-to-person) comparisons. Each person-region is characterized by a distribution of Fractional Anisotropy and comparisons are made via Median, Mean, Bhattacharya and Kullback-Liebler distances. Additionally, we examine an ordinal decision rule which compares a subject's n<sup>th</sup> most atypical region to a healthy control's. Ordinal comparison is motivated by mTBI's heterogeneity; each mTBI has some set of damaged tissue which is not necessarily spatially consistent. These improvements correctly distinguish Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms in a small dataset but achieve only a .74 AUC in identifying mTBI subjects with milder symptoms. Finally, we perform subject-specific simulations which characterize which injuries are detected and which are missed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6004828/pdf/nihms956808.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于轻度脑外伤(mTBI)是异质性的,因此分类方法需要从健康组织模型中进行离群点检测。构建这样的模型具有挑战性。相反,我们利用特定区域的成对(人与人)比较。每个人-区域都以分数各向异性分布为特征,并通过中位数、平均值、巴塔查里亚距离和库尔贝克-李卜勒距离进行比较。此外,我们还研究了一种顺序决策规则,该规则将受试者的第 n 个最不典型区域与健康对照组的最不典型区域进行比较。序数比较的动机是 mTBI 的异质性;每个 mTBI 都有一些受损组织集,而这些受损组织集在空间上不一定是一致的。这些改进在一个小型数据集中正确区分了持续性撞击后症状,但在识别症状较轻的 mTBI 受试者方面,AUC 值仅为 0.74。最后,我们进行了针对特定受试者的模拟,以确定哪些损伤被检测到,哪些被遗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pairwise, Ordinal Outlier Detection of Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Pairwise, Ordinal Outlier Detection of Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Pairwise, Ordinal Outlier Detection of Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Because mild Traumatic Brain Injuries (mTBI) are heterogeneous, classification methods perform outlier detection from a model of healthy tissue. Such a model is challenging to construct. Instead, we utilize region-specific pairwise (person-to-person) comparisons. Each person-region is characterized by a distribution of Fractional Anisotropy and comparisons are made via Median, Mean, Bhattacharya and Kullback-Liebler distances. Additionally, we examine an ordinal decision rule which compares a subject's nth most atypical region to a healthy control's. Ordinal comparison is motivated by mTBI's heterogeneity; each mTBI has some set of damaged tissue which is not necessarily spatially consistent. These improvements correctly distinguish Persistent Post-Concussive Symptoms in a small dataset but achieve only a .74 AUC in identifying mTBI subjects with milder symptoms. Finally, we perform subject-specific simulations which characterize which injuries are detected and which are missed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信