探讨支架在本科化学实验室问题型学习中的作用

IF 3.2 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sujatha Varadarajan and Savita Ladage
{"title":"探讨支架在本科化学实验室问题型学习中的作用","authors":"Sujatha Varadarajan and Savita Ladage","doi":"10.1039/D1RP00180A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >The need for shifting the expository laboratory instruction style to inquiry-based approaches is widely acknowledged. Problem-based learning (PBL), one of the inquiry-based approaches, advocates students’ self-directed learning. The literature indicates that scaffolding students’ independent learning is necessary for a PBL environment. In our study, we provided scaffolds such as a precursor task, reading material, and structured group discussion to facilitate the planning of a PBL task on indigo dyeing wastewater treatment. In this paper, we describe how these three scaffolds integrated within the PBL style contributed to students’ learning as per the stages of Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle (ELC). We analyzed the level of the abstract conceptualization stage of ELC through students’ experimental designs (EDs) of the PBL task. The results of the qualitative analysis of the scaffolded and un-scaffolded groups suggest that scaffolded students’ experimental design scores are higher. The qualitative results indicate that the structured group discussion influences the EDs planned by students more than the precursor task and the reading material. All three scaffolds help in the reflective learning and planning of executable EDs for a PBL task. The study indicates that students transitioning into the inquiry laboratory benefit from the inclusion of scaffolding.</p>","PeriodicalId":69,"journal":{"name":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","volume":" 1","pages":" 159-172"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the role of scaffolds in problem-based learning (PBL) in an undergraduate chemistry laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Sujatha Varadarajan and Savita Ladage\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/D1RP00180A\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >The need for shifting the expository laboratory instruction style to inquiry-based approaches is widely acknowledged. Problem-based learning (PBL), one of the inquiry-based approaches, advocates students’ self-directed learning. The literature indicates that scaffolding students’ independent learning is necessary for a PBL environment. In our study, we provided scaffolds such as a precursor task, reading material, and structured group discussion to facilitate the planning of a PBL task on indigo dyeing wastewater treatment. In this paper, we describe how these three scaffolds integrated within the PBL style contributed to students’ learning as per the stages of Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle (ELC). We analyzed the level of the abstract conceptualization stage of ELC through students’ experimental designs (EDs) of the PBL task. The results of the qualitative analysis of the scaffolded and un-scaffolded groups suggest that scaffolded students’ experimental design scores are higher. The qualitative results indicate that the structured group discussion influences the EDs planned by students more than the precursor task and the reading material. All three scaffolds help in the reflective learning and planning of executable EDs for a PBL task. The study indicates that students transitioning into the inquiry laboratory benefit from the inclusion of scaffolding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":69,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\" 159-172\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemistry Education Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/rp/d1rp00180a\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemistry Education Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2022/rp/d1rp00180a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

将说明性的实验室教学方式转变为探究性的教学方式的必要性已得到广泛认可。基于问题的学习(PBL)是一种基于探究的学习方法,提倡学生自主学习。文献表明,在PBL环境中,学生的自主学习是必要的。在我们的研究中,我们提供了前体任务、阅读材料和结构化小组讨论等支架,以促进靛蓝染色废水处理PBL任务的规划。在本文中,我们根据科尔布的体验式学习周期(ELC)的阶段描述了PBL风格中整合的这三个框架如何对学生的学习做出贡献。我们通过学生对PBL任务的实验设计来分析ELC抽象概念化阶段的水平。对支架组和非支架组的定性分析结果表明,支架组学生的实验设计得分更高。定性结果表明,结构化的小组讨论对学生计划阅读的影响大于前置任务和阅读材料。所有这三个框架都有助于PBL任务的可执行EDs的反思性学习和计划。研究表明,学生过渡到探究实验室受益于脚手架的包含。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the role of scaffolds in problem-based learning (PBL) in an undergraduate chemistry laboratory

The need for shifting the expository laboratory instruction style to inquiry-based approaches is widely acknowledged. Problem-based learning (PBL), one of the inquiry-based approaches, advocates students’ self-directed learning. The literature indicates that scaffolding students’ independent learning is necessary for a PBL environment. In our study, we provided scaffolds such as a precursor task, reading material, and structured group discussion to facilitate the planning of a PBL task on indigo dyeing wastewater treatment. In this paper, we describe how these three scaffolds integrated within the PBL style contributed to students’ learning as per the stages of Kolb's Experiential Learning Cycle (ELC). We analyzed the level of the abstract conceptualization stage of ELC through students’ experimental designs (EDs) of the PBL task. The results of the qualitative analysis of the scaffolded and un-scaffolded groups suggest that scaffolded students’ experimental design scores are higher. The qualitative results indicate that the structured group discussion influences the EDs planned by students more than the precursor task and the reading material. All three scaffolds help in the reflective learning and planning of executable EDs for a PBL task. The study indicates that students transitioning into the inquiry laboratory benefit from the inclusion of scaffolding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
26.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal for teachers, researchers and other practitioners in chemistry education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信