弗朗西斯·培根和磁性宇宙学。

IF 1 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Isis Pub Date : 2016-12-01 DOI:10.1086/689695
Xiaona Wang
{"title":"弗朗西斯·培根和磁性宇宙学。","authors":"Xiaona Wang","doi":"10.1086/689695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A short-lived but important movement in seventeenth-century English natural philosophy—which scholars call “magnetical philosophy” or\n“magnetical cosmology”—sought to understand gravity (both terrestrial and celestial) by analogy with magnetism. The movement was clearly inspired by William Gilbert’s De magnete (1600) and culminated with Robert Hooke’s prefiguring of the universal principle of gravitation, which he personally communicated to Isaac Newton in 1679. But the magnetical cosmology, as professed by those in the movement, differed from Gilbert’s philosophy in highly significant ways. Proponents never accepted Gilbert’s animistic account of magnets and seem tacitly to have accepted a belief in action at a distance that Gilbert himself rejected. This essay argues that Francis Bacon (1561–1626) had already provided just the adaptations to Gilbert’s philosophy that the later thinkers adopted, including an important endorsement of action at a distance, and that he should be recognized as playing an important role in the movement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14667,"journal":{"name":"Isis","volume":"107 4","pages":"707-21"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/689695","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Francis Bacon and Magnetical Cosmology.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaona Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/689695\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A short-lived but important movement in seventeenth-century English natural philosophy—which scholars call “magnetical philosophy” or\\n“magnetical cosmology”—sought to understand gravity (both terrestrial and celestial) by analogy with magnetism. The movement was clearly inspired by William Gilbert’s De magnete (1600) and culminated with Robert Hooke’s prefiguring of the universal principle of gravitation, which he personally communicated to Isaac Newton in 1679. But the magnetical cosmology, as professed by those in the movement, differed from Gilbert’s philosophy in highly significant ways. Proponents never accepted Gilbert’s animistic account of magnets and seem tacitly to have accepted a belief in action at a distance that Gilbert himself rejected. This essay argues that Francis Bacon (1561–1626) had already provided just the adaptations to Gilbert’s philosophy that the later thinkers adopted, including an important endorsement of action at a distance, and that he should be recognized as playing an important role in the movement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Isis\",\"volume\":\"107 4\",\"pages\":\"707-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/689695\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Isis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/689695\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Isis","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/689695","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

17世纪英国自然哲学中有一场短暂但重要的运动——学者们称之为“磁性哲学”或“磁性宇宙学”——试图通过类比磁性来理解地心引力(包括地球引力和天体引力)。这一运动显然受到了威廉·吉尔伯特的《论磁力》(1600)的启发,并以罗伯特·胡克对万有引力原理的预言达到高潮,胡克于1679年亲自向艾萨克·牛顿传达了这一理论。但是,运动中那些人所宣称的“磁性宇宙论”与吉尔伯特的哲学在许多重要方面存在差异。支持者从来没有接受过吉尔伯特关于磁铁的万物有灵论,似乎默认了吉尔伯特本人拒绝的远距离作用的信念。这篇文章认为,弗朗西斯·培根(1561-1626)已经为吉尔伯特的哲学提供了后来的思想家所采用的改编,包括对远距离行动的重要认可,他应该被认为在运动中发挥了重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Francis Bacon and Magnetical Cosmology.

A short-lived but important movement in seventeenth-century English natural philosophy—which scholars call “magnetical philosophy” or “magnetical cosmology”—sought to understand gravity (both terrestrial and celestial) by analogy with magnetism. The movement was clearly inspired by William Gilbert’s De magnete (1600) and culminated with Robert Hooke’s prefiguring of the universal principle of gravitation, which he personally communicated to Isaac Newton in 1679. But the magnetical cosmology, as professed by those in the movement, differed from Gilbert’s philosophy in highly significant ways. Proponents never accepted Gilbert’s animistic account of magnets and seem tacitly to have accepted a belief in action at a distance that Gilbert himself rejected. This essay argues that Francis Bacon (1561–1626) had already provided just the adaptations to Gilbert’s philosophy that the later thinkers adopted, including an important endorsement of action at a distance, and that he should be recognized as playing an important role in the movement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Isis
Isis 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
150
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1912, Isis has featured scholarly articles, research notes, and commentary on the history of science, medicine, and technology and their cultural influences. Review essays and book reviews on new contributions to the discipline are also included. An official publication of the History of Science Society, Isis is the oldest English-language journal in the field. The Press, along with the journal’s editorial office in Starkville, MS, would like to acknowledge the following supporters: Mississippi State University, its College of Arts and Sciences and History Department, and the Consortium for the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信