下肠出血的紧急结肠镜检查。

A G Korotkevich, E V Zakharchenko, A S Leont'ev, R A Plyusnin
{"title":"下肠出血的紧急结肠镜检查。","authors":"A G Korotkevich,&nbsp;E V Zakharchenko,&nbsp;A S Leont'ev,&nbsp;R A Plyusnin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy and safety of emergency colonoscopy without colon preparation at patients with intestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a comparative cohort study included 252 patients admitted due to intestinal bleeding in 2006- 2015. 118 men, women 134. The average age was 60.15 ± 15,7 years. Patients with explicit anal / hemorrhoidal bleeding at admission or manifestations of gastroesophageal bleeding were excluded. Randomization was performed by alternating days of hospitalization. In Hospital N~ 29 colonoscopy was performed at admission without prior colon preparation, patients of Hospital N~ 1 performed lavage or enema preparation prior to colonoscopy within 24-48hours of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the structure of intestinal bleeding source were identified. In patients without bowel preparation most frequently detected bleeding diverticula and cancer - 17%, ulcerative colitis - 1096, intestinal bleeding - 1696, upper bleeding - 16%. At preliminary colon preparation most often as likely causes bleeding source detected cancers - 22%, ulcerative colitis - 15%, angiodysplasia - 13%. Analysis of the dependence of bleeding sources structure from bowel preparation revealed differences only in women. The number of endoscopic findings at colon preparation was 1.5 times higher versus emergency colonoscopy without colon preparation. The number and structure of the observed changes were significantly different between groups, and depending on the sex of patients. There were no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colonoscopy at intestinal bleeding without colon preparation is safe and highly informative in identifying of.</p>","PeriodicalId":11555,"journal":{"name":"Eksperimental'naia i klinicheskaia gastroenterologiia = Experimental & clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"URGENT COLONOSCOPY IN LOWER INTESTINAL BLEEDING.\",\"authors\":\"A G Korotkevich,&nbsp;E V Zakharchenko,&nbsp;A S Leont'ev,&nbsp;R A Plyusnin\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy and safety of emergency colonoscopy without colon preparation at patients with intestinal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In a comparative cohort study included 252 patients admitted due to intestinal bleeding in 2006- 2015. 118 men, women 134. The average age was 60.15 ± 15,7 years. Patients with explicit anal / hemorrhoidal bleeding at admission or manifestations of gastroesophageal bleeding were excluded. Randomization was performed by alternating days of hospitalization. In Hospital N~ 29 colonoscopy was performed at admission without prior colon preparation, patients of Hospital N~ 1 performed lavage or enema preparation prior to colonoscopy within 24-48hours of hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in the structure of intestinal bleeding source were identified. In patients without bowel preparation most frequently detected bleeding diverticula and cancer - 17%, ulcerative colitis - 1096, intestinal bleeding - 1696, upper bleeding - 16%. At preliminary colon preparation most often as likely causes bleeding source detected cancers - 22%, ulcerative colitis - 15%, angiodysplasia - 13%. Analysis of the dependence of bleeding sources structure from bowel preparation revealed differences only in women. The number of endoscopic findings at colon preparation was 1.5 times higher versus emergency colonoscopy without colon preparation. The number and structure of the observed changes were significantly different between groups, and depending on the sex of patients. There were no complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Colonoscopy at intestinal bleeding without colon preparation is safe and highly informative in identifying of.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eksperimental'naia i klinicheskaia gastroenterologiia = Experimental & clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eksperimental'naia i klinicheskaia gastroenterologiia = Experimental & clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eksperimental'naia i klinicheskaia gastroenterologiia = Experimental & clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是比较无结肠准备的紧急结肠镜检查对肠出血患者的诊断效果和安全性。材料和方法:在一项比较队列研究中,纳入了2006- 2015年因肠道出血入院的252例患者。男性118人,女性134人。平均年龄60.15±15.7岁。排除入院时有明显肛门/痔疮出血或胃食管出血表现的患者。通过交替住院天数进行随机化。N~ 29医院入院时结肠镜检查未进行结肠准备,N~ 1医院患者住院24 ~ 48小时内结肠镜检查前进行灌洗或灌肠准备。结果:两组肠道出血源结构存在显著差异。在没有肠道准备的患者中,最常发现的是憩室出血和癌症(17%),溃疡性结肠炎(1096),肠道出血(1696),上出血(16%)。在结肠前期准备时,最常见的出血原因是发现癌症(22%),溃疡性结肠炎(15%),血管发育不良(13%)。肠准备对出血来源结构的依赖性分析显示,只有女性存在差异。结肠准备的内镜检查结果比没有结肠准备的急诊结肠镜检查高1.5倍。观察到的变化的数量和结构在两组之间有显著差异,并取决于患者的性别。没有并发症。结论:在无结肠准备的情况下,结肠镜检查小肠出血是安全的,并能提供较高的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
URGENT COLONOSCOPY IN LOWER INTESTINAL BLEEDING.

The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy and safety of emergency colonoscopy without colon preparation at patients with intestinal bleeding.

Material and methods: In a comparative cohort study included 252 patients admitted due to intestinal bleeding in 2006- 2015. 118 men, women 134. The average age was 60.15 ± 15,7 years. Patients with explicit anal / hemorrhoidal bleeding at admission or manifestations of gastroesophageal bleeding were excluded. Randomization was performed by alternating days of hospitalization. In Hospital N~ 29 colonoscopy was performed at admission without prior colon preparation, patients of Hospital N~ 1 performed lavage or enema preparation prior to colonoscopy within 24-48hours of hospitalization.

Results: Significant differences in the structure of intestinal bleeding source were identified. In patients without bowel preparation most frequently detected bleeding diverticula and cancer - 17%, ulcerative colitis - 1096, intestinal bleeding - 1696, upper bleeding - 16%. At preliminary colon preparation most often as likely causes bleeding source detected cancers - 22%, ulcerative colitis - 15%, angiodysplasia - 13%. Analysis of the dependence of bleeding sources structure from bowel preparation revealed differences only in women. The number of endoscopic findings at colon preparation was 1.5 times higher versus emergency colonoscopy without colon preparation. The number and structure of the observed changes were significantly different between groups, and depending on the sex of patients. There were no complications.

Conclusion: Colonoscopy at intestinal bleeding without colon preparation is safe and highly informative in identifying of.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信