单次关节内注射凝胶-200治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的两项多中心随机对照试验的汇总分析

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Junko Takamura, Takayuki Seo, Vibeke Strand
{"title":"单次关节内注射凝胶-200治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的两项多中心随机对照试验的汇总分析","authors":"Junko Takamura, Takayuki Seo, Vibeke Strand","doi":"10.1177/1179544118773068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To perform an integrated analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200 compared with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the intention-to-treat (ITT) populations of both RCTs were pooled for this integrated analysis. Mean changes from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscores were assessed using a longitudinal model; treatment differences were compared between intra-articular Gel-200 and PBS injections. Analyses included secondary outcome measures repeated at individual time points. The safety populations of both RCTs were pooled for an integrated safety analysis to compare adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled ITT population included 1184 subjects (649 Gel-200; 535 PBS); demographic characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Mean improvements in pain subscores from baseline to week 12 were -24.7 mm in Gel-200 and -21.8 mm in PBS groups, a statistically significant treatment group difference of -2.9 mm (<i>P</i> = .047). From weeks 3 to 26, mean improvements from baseline in pain subscores were -23.8 mm with Gel-200 and -20.8 mm with PBS; this treatment group difference of -3.0 mm was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .017). The rate of AEs was similar between Gel-200 and PBS treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This integrated analysis demonstrated the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200 compared with PBS for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee over 26 weeks without major safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT00449696 and NCT00450112.</p>","PeriodicalId":10443,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544118773068","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Intra-articular Injection of Gel-200 for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee.\",\"authors\":\"Junko Takamura, Takayuki Seo, Vibeke Strand\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179544118773068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>To perform an integrated analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200 compared with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the intention-to-treat (ITT) populations of both RCTs were pooled for this integrated analysis. Mean changes from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscores were assessed using a longitudinal model; treatment differences were compared between intra-articular Gel-200 and PBS injections. Analyses included secondary outcome measures repeated at individual time points. The safety populations of both RCTs were pooled for an integrated safety analysis to compare adverse events (AEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pooled ITT population included 1184 subjects (649 Gel-200; 535 PBS); demographic characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Mean improvements in pain subscores from baseline to week 12 were -24.7 mm in Gel-200 and -21.8 mm in PBS groups, a statistically significant treatment group difference of -2.9 mm (<i>P</i> = .047). From weeks 3 to 26, mean improvements from baseline in pain subscores were -23.8 mm with Gel-200 and -20.8 mm with PBS; this treatment group difference of -3.0 mm was statistically significant (<i>P</i> = .017). The rate of AEs was similar between Gel-200 and PBS treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This integrated analysis demonstrated the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200 compared with PBS for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee over 26 weeks without major safety concerns.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT00449696 and NCT00450112.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1179544118773068\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544118773068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights. Arthritis and Musculoskeletal Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179544118773068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景和目的:对2项随机对照试验(RCTs)进行综合分析,以评估单次关节内注射Gel-200与磷酸盐缓冲盐水(PBS)治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效和安全性。方法:将两项随机对照试验的意向治疗(ITT)人群的数据汇总进行综合分析。使用纵向模型评估西安大略省和麦克马斯特大学关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛评分与基线的平均变化;比较关节内注射Gel-200和PBS的治疗差异。分析包括在个别时间点重复的次要结果测量。对两项随机对照试验的安全人群进行综合安全性分析,以比较不良事件(ae)。结果:ITT人群共纳入1184名受试者(649名Gel-200;535 PBS);治疗组间的人口学特征相似。从基线到第12周,凝胶-200组疼痛评分的平均改善为-24.7 mm, PBS组为-21.8 mm,治疗组差异有统计学意义-2.9 mm (P = 0.047)。从第3周到第26周,Gel-200组疼痛评分较基线的平均改善为-23.8 mm, PBS组为-20.8 mm;治疗组-3.0 mm差异有统计学意义(P = 0.017)。凝胶-200治疗组和PBS治疗组的ae发生率相似。结论:这项综合分析表明,与PBS相比,单次关节内注射Gel-200治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效超过26周,没有重大的安全性问题。试验注册号:NCT00449696和NCT00450112。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Intra-articular Injection of Gel-200 for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Intra-articular Injection of Gel-200 for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Intra-articular Injection of Gel-200 for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

A Pooled Analysis of Two Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trials of a Single Intra-articular Injection of Gel-200 for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee.

Background and objective: To perform an integrated analysis of 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy and safety of a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200 compared with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.

Methods: Data from the intention-to-treat (ITT) populations of both RCTs were pooled for this integrated analysis. Mean changes from baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscores were assessed using a longitudinal model; treatment differences were compared between intra-articular Gel-200 and PBS injections. Analyses included secondary outcome measures repeated at individual time points. The safety populations of both RCTs were pooled for an integrated safety analysis to compare adverse events (AEs).

Results: The pooled ITT population included 1184 subjects (649 Gel-200; 535 PBS); demographic characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Mean improvements in pain subscores from baseline to week 12 were -24.7 mm in Gel-200 and -21.8 mm in PBS groups, a statistically significant treatment group difference of -2.9 mm (P = .047). From weeks 3 to 26, mean improvements from baseline in pain subscores were -23.8 mm with Gel-200 and -20.8 mm with PBS; this treatment group difference of -3.0 mm was statistically significant (P = .017). The rate of AEs was similar between Gel-200 and PBS treatment groups.

Conclusion: This integrated analysis demonstrated the efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of Gel-200 compared with PBS for treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee over 26 weeks without major safety concerns.

Trial registration: NCT00449696 and NCT00450112.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信