波兰两个盐矿空气中细菌和真菌的比较分析

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Elżbieta Gębarowska, Wojciech Pusz, Jolanta Kucińska, Włodzimierz Kita
{"title":"波兰两个盐矿空气中细菌和真菌的比较分析","authors":"Elżbieta Gębarowska,&nbsp;Wojciech Pusz,&nbsp;Jolanta Kucińska,&nbsp;Włodzimierz Kita","doi":"10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this work was to determine the genera or species composition and the number of colony forming units of airborne bacteria and fungi, respectively, in two salt mines in Poland “Wieliczka” (Lesser Poland) and “Polkowice–Sieroszowice” (Lower Silesia). Both of them are working environments characterized by extreme conditions, and additionally “Wieliczka,” officially placed on the UNESCO World Heritage Sites’ list, plays a role of tourist attraction. There are also some curative chambers located in this mine. Air samples were taken once in December 2015, between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. There were nine measurement points located about 200 m underground in “Wieliczka” and six measurement points located in the working shafts about 400 m underground in “Polkowice–Sieroszowice.” The total volume of each air sample was 150 L. Air samples, collected in individual measurement points of both salt mines, were inoculated on two microbiological media: potato dextrose agar and tryptic soy agar using the impact method. We identified 10 and 3 fungal genera in the “Wieliczka” Salt Mine and in “Polkowice–Sieroszowice,” respectively. The most common were fungi of the <i>Penicillium</i> genus. In both mines, the Gram-positive bacteria of genus <i>Micrococcus</i> were detected most frequently. Among identified microorganisms, there were neither pathogenic fungi nor bacteria. The most prevalent microorganisms detected in indoor air were Gram-positive cocci, which constituted up to 80% of airborne microflora. Our results showed that microorganisms recorded in the air samples are not a threat to workers, tourists or patients. Neither pathogens nor potentially pathogenic microorganisms, listed as BSL-2, BSL-3 or BSL-4, were detected. The microbes identified during our analysis commonly occur in such environments as the soil, water and air. Some of the detected bacteria are component of natural microflora of human skin and mucous membranes, and they can cause only opportunistic infections in individuals depending on their health condition.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7718,"journal":{"name":"Aerobiologia","volume":"34 2","pages":"127 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of airborne bacteria and fungi in two salt mines in Poland\",\"authors\":\"Elżbieta Gębarowska,&nbsp;Wojciech Pusz,&nbsp;Jolanta Kucińska,&nbsp;Włodzimierz Kita\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this work was to determine the genera or species composition and the number of colony forming units of airborne bacteria and fungi, respectively, in two salt mines in Poland “Wieliczka” (Lesser Poland) and “Polkowice–Sieroszowice” (Lower Silesia). Both of them are working environments characterized by extreme conditions, and additionally “Wieliczka,” officially placed on the UNESCO World Heritage Sites’ list, plays a role of tourist attraction. There are also some curative chambers located in this mine. Air samples were taken once in December 2015, between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. There were nine measurement points located about 200 m underground in “Wieliczka” and six measurement points located in the working shafts about 400 m underground in “Polkowice–Sieroszowice.” The total volume of each air sample was 150 L. Air samples, collected in individual measurement points of both salt mines, were inoculated on two microbiological media: potato dextrose agar and tryptic soy agar using the impact method. We identified 10 and 3 fungal genera in the “Wieliczka” Salt Mine and in “Polkowice–Sieroszowice,” respectively. The most common were fungi of the <i>Penicillium</i> genus. In both mines, the Gram-positive bacteria of genus <i>Micrococcus</i> were detected most frequently. Among identified microorganisms, there were neither pathogenic fungi nor bacteria. The most prevalent microorganisms detected in indoor air were Gram-positive cocci, which constituted up to 80% of airborne microflora. Our results showed that microorganisms recorded in the air samples are not a threat to workers, tourists or patients. Neither pathogens nor potentially pathogenic microorganisms, listed as BSL-2, BSL-3 or BSL-4, were detected. The microbes identified during our analysis commonly occur in such environments as the soil, water and air. Some of the detected bacteria are component of natural microflora of human skin and mucous membranes, and they can cause only opportunistic infections in individuals depending on their health condition.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aerobiologia\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"127 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aerobiologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10453-017-9502-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

这项工作的目的是分别确定波兰“Wieliczka”(小波兰)和“Polkowice–Sieroszowice”(下西里西亚)两个盐矿中空气传播细菌和真菌的属或种组成以及菌落形成单位的数量。这两个地方都是以极端条件为特征的工作环境,此外,被正式列入联合国教科文组织世界遗产名录的“维利奇卡”也起到了旅游景点的作用。这个矿井里还有一些治疗室。2015年12月,在早上6点至9点之间采集了一次空气样本。“Wieliczka”地下约200米处有9个测量点,“Polkowice–Sieroszowice”地下约400米处有6个测量点。每个空气样本的总体积为150升。在两个盐矿的单独测量点采集的空气样本,使用冲击法接种在两种微生物培养基上:马铃薯葡萄糖琼脂和胰蛋白酶大豆琼脂。我们在“Wieliczka”盐矿和“Polkowice–Sieroszowice”分别鉴定了10个和3个真菌属。最常见的是青霉属真菌。在这两个矿井中,微球菌属的革兰氏阳性菌检出率最高。在已鉴定的微生物中,既没有病原真菌,也没有细菌。在室内空气中检测到的最常见的微生物是革兰氏阳性球菌,它占空气中微生物群落的80%。我们的研究结果表明,空气样本中记录的微生物对工人、游客或患者没有威胁。既没有检测到病原体,也没有检测到潜在致病微生物,如BSL-2、BSL-3或BSL-4。在我们的分析中发现的微生物通常出现在土壤、水和空气等环境中。一些被检测到的细菌是人类皮肤和粘膜自然菌群的组成部分,根据个人的健康状况,它们只会导致机会性感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of airborne bacteria and fungi in two salt mines in Poland

The aim of this work was to determine the genera or species composition and the number of colony forming units of airborne bacteria and fungi, respectively, in two salt mines in Poland “Wieliczka” (Lesser Poland) and “Polkowice–Sieroszowice” (Lower Silesia). Both of them are working environments characterized by extreme conditions, and additionally “Wieliczka,” officially placed on the UNESCO World Heritage Sites’ list, plays a role of tourist attraction. There are also some curative chambers located in this mine. Air samples were taken once in December 2015, between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. There were nine measurement points located about 200 m underground in “Wieliczka” and six measurement points located in the working shafts about 400 m underground in “Polkowice–Sieroszowice.” The total volume of each air sample was 150 L. Air samples, collected in individual measurement points of both salt mines, were inoculated on two microbiological media: potato dextrose agar and tryptic soy agar using the impact method. We identified 10 and 3 fungal genera in the “Wieliczka” Salt Mine and in “Polkowice–Sieroszowice,” respectively. The most common were fungi of the Penicillium genus. In both mines, the Gram-positive bacteria of genus Micrococcus were detected most frequently. Among identified microorganisms, there were neither pathogenic fungi nor bacteria. The most prevalent microorganisms detected in indoor air were Gram-positive cocci, which constituted up to 80% of airborne microflora. Our results showed that microorganisms recorded in the air samples are not a threat to workers, tourists or patients. Neither pathogens nor potentially pathogenic microorganisms, listed as BSL-2, BSL-3 or BSL-4, were detected. The microbes identified during our analysis commonly occur in such environments as the soil, water and air. Some of the detected bacteria are component of natural microflora of human skin and mucous membranes, and they can cause only opportunistic infections in individuals depending on their health condition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Aerobiologia
Aerobiologia 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Associated with the International Association for Aerobiology, Aerobiologia is an international medium for original research and review articles in the interdisciplinary fields of aerobiology and interaction of human, plant and animal systems on the biosphere. Coverage includes bioaerosols, transport mechanisms, biometeorology, climatology, air-sea interaction, land-surface/atmosphere interaction, biological pollution, biological input to global change, microbiology, aeromycology, aeropalynology, arthropod dispersal and environmental policy. Emphasis is placed on respiratory allergology, plant pathology, pest management, biological weathering and biodeterioration, indoor air quality, air-conditioning technology, industrial aerobiology and more. Aerobiologia serves aerobiologists, and other professionals in medicine, public health, industrial and environmental hygiene, biological sciences, agriculture, atmospheric physics, botany, environmental science and cultural heritage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信