金鸡纳树皮治疗疟疾的历史。

Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog Pub Date : 2016-01-01
Henrik Permin, Svend Norn, Edith Kruse, Poul R Kruse
{"title":"金鸡纳树皮治疗疟疾的历史。","authors":"Henrik Permin,&nbsp;Svend Norn,&nbsp;Edith Kruse,&nbsp;Poul R Kruse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>How and when the medical value of Cinchona bark was discovered is obscure, but it is said that the powder was given to a European for malaria for the first time in the 1630s. The bark was brought to Europe by Spanish missionaries and it was recommended by the cardinal Juan de Lugo. In the 1660s, the use of Cinchona bark became known in England - and in Denmark by Thomas Bartholin. It was used for the treatment of malaria, but several debates on its value continued up to the 1730s. However, successful treatment of malaria was obtained by Thomas Sydenham, Robert Tabor and Francesco Torti. Sydenham emphasized a modern view that Cinchona bark was a unique specific drug for the treatment of malaria, and the treatment was fully accepted when Torti's Therapeutice specialis appeared. In the early 18th century, botanical expeditions were arranged in search of the most valuable Cinchona species for cultivation. The content of quinine was impor- tant, and determination of quinine was realized when Pierre Pelletier and Joseph Caventou isolated the alkaloid from the bark in 1820. Dutch plantations and quinine industry dominated the market, but the supply of quinine came to an end when the Japanese occupied Indonesia in 1942, cutting off the rest of the world from the main supplies of Cinchona. Synthetic antimalarials were developed and chloroquine became the drug of choice, but the intensive use of these drugs caused drug resistance. Chloroquine-resistant strains of P. falciparum are now treated with other drugs as artemisinin and artemether.</p>","PeriodicalId":81069,"journal":{"name":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","volume":"44 ","pages":"9-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the history of Cinchona bark in the treatment of Malaria.\",\"authors\":\"Henrik Permin,&nbsp;Svend Norn,&nbsp;Edith Kruse,&nbsp;Poul R Kruse\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>How and when the medical value of Cinchona bark was discovered is obscure, but it is said that the powder was given to a European for malaria for the first time in the 1630s. The bark was brought to Europe by Spanish missionaries and it was recommended by the cardinal Juan de Lugo. In the 1660s, the use of Cinchona bark became known in England - and in Denmark by Thomas Bartholin. It was used for the treatment of malaria, but several debates on its value continued up to the 1730s. However, successful treatment of malaria was obtained by Thomas Sydenham, Robert Tabor and Francesco Torti. Sydenham emphasized a modern view that Cinchona bark was a unique specific drug for the treatment of malaria, and the treatment was fully accepted when Torti's Therapeutice specialis appeared. In the early 18th century, botanical expeditions were arranged in search of the most valuable Cinchona species for cultivation. The content of quinine was impor- tant, and determination of quinine was realized when Pierre Pelletier and Joseph Caventou isolated the alkaloid from the bark in 1820. Dutch plantations and quinine industry dominated the market, but the supply of quinine came to an end when the Japanese occupied Indonesia in 1942, cutting off the rest of the world from the main supplies of Cinchona. Synthetic antimalarials were developed and chloroquine became the drug of choice, but the intensive use of these drugs caused drug resistance. Chloroquine-resistant strains of P. falciparum are now treated with other drugs as artemisinin and artemether.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":81069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"9-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dansk medicinhistorisk arbog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金鸡纳树皮的药用价值是如何以及何时被发现的,我们不得而知,但据说在17世纪30年代,金鸡纳树皮的粉末第一次被给了一个欧洲人治疗疟疾。这种树皮是由西班牙传教士带到欧洲的,是红衣主教胡安·德·卢戈推荐的。在17世纪60年代,金鸡纳树皮的使用在英国和丹麦被托马斯·巴托林所熟知。它被用来治疗疟疾,但关于它的价值的争论一直持续到18世纪30年代。然而,Thomas Sydenham、Robert Tabor和Francesco Torti成功地治疗了疟疾。Sydenham强调了一种现代观点,金鸡纳树皮是一种治疗疟疾的独特药物,当Torti的治疗方法出现时,这种治疗方法被完全接受。在18世纪早期,植物探险队被安排寻找最有价值的金鸡纳物种进行种植。奎宁的含量很重要,1820年Pierre Pelletier和Joseph Caventou从树皮中分离出生物碱,实现了奎宁的测定。荷兰种植园和奎宁工业主导了市场,但1942年日本占领印度尼西亚后,奎宁的供应停止了,切断了世界其他地区对金鸡纳的主要供应。合成抗疟药被开发出来,氯喹成为首选药物,但这些药物的大量使用造成了耐药性。恶性疟原虫耐氯喹菌株现在用其他药物治疗,如青蒿素和蒿甲醚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the history of Cinchona bark in the treatment of Malaria.

How and when the medical value of Cinchona bark was discovered is obscure, but it is said that the powder was given to a European for malaria for the first time in the 1630s. The bark was brought to Europe by Spanish missionaries and it was recommended by the cardinal Juan de Lugo. In the 1660s, the use of Cinchona bark became known in England - and in Denmark by Thomas Bartholin. It was used for the treatment of malaria, but several debates on its value continued up to the 1730s. However, successful treatment of malaria was obtained by Thomas Sydenham, Robert Tabor and Francesco Torti. Sydenham emphasized a modern view that Cinchona bark was a unique specific drug for the treatment of malaria, and the treatment was fully accepted when Torti's Therapeutice specialis appeared. In the early 18th century, botanical expeditions were arranged in search of the most valuable Cinchona species for cultivation. The content of quinine was impor- tant, and determination of quinine was realized when Pierre Pelletier and Joseph Caventou isolated the alkaloid from the bark in 1820. Dutch plantations and quinine industry dominated the market, but the supply of quinine came to an end when the Japanese occupied Indonesia in 1942, cutting off the rest of the world from the main supplies of Cinchona. Synthetic antimalarials were developed and chloroquine became the drug of choice, but the intensive use of these drugs caused drug resistance. Chloroquine-resistant strains of P. falciparum are now treated with other drugs as artemisinin and artemether.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信