未知数目对象的骰子重叠度量:在病灶分割中的应用。

Ipek Oguz, Aaron Carass, Dzung L Pham, Snehashis Roy, Nagesh Subbana, Peter A Calabresi, Paul A Yushkevich, Russell T Shinohara, Jerry L Prince
{"title":"未知数目对象的骰子重叠度量:在病灶分割中的应用。","authors":"Ipek Oguz,&nbsp;Aaron Carass,&nbsp;Dzung L Pham,&nbsp;Snehashis Roy,&nbsp;Nagesh Subbana,&nbsp;Peter A Calabresi,&nbsp;Paul A Yushkevich,&nbsp;Russell T Shinohara,&nbsp;Jerry L Prince","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Dice overlap ratio is commonly used to evaluate the performance of image segmentation algorithms. While Dice overlap is very useful as a standardized quantitative measure of segmentation accuracy in many applications, it offers a very limited picture of segmentation quality in complex segmentation tasks where the number of target objects is not known <i>a priori</i>, such as the segmentation of white matter lesions or lung nodules. While Dice overlap can still be used in these applications, segmentation algorithms may perform quite differently in ways not reflected by differences in their Dice score. Here we propose a new set of evaluation techniques that offer new insights into the behavior of segmentation algorithms. We illustrate these techniques with a case study comparing two popular multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation algorithms: OASIS and LesionTOADS.</p>","PeriodicalId":72455,"journal":{"name":"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dice Overlap Measures for Objects of Unknown Number: Application to Lesion Segmentation.\",\"authors\":\"Ipek Oguz,&nbsp;Aaron Carass,&nbsp;Dzung L Pham,&nbsp;Snehashis Roy,&nbsp;Nagesh Subbana,&nbsp;Peter A Calabresi,&nbsp;Paul A Yushkevich,&nbsp;Russell T Shinohara,&nbsp;Jerry L Prince\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Dice overlap ratio is commonly used to evaluate the performance of image segmentation algorithms. While Dice overlap is very useful as a standardized quantitative measure of segmentation accuracy in many applications, it offers a very limited picture of segmentation quality in complex segmentation tasks where the number of target objects is not known <i>a priori</i>, such as the segmentation of white matter lesions or lung nodules. While Dice overlap can still be used in these applications, segmentation algorithms may perform quite differently in ways not reflected by differences in their Dice score. Here we propose a new set of evaluation techniques that offer new insights into the behavior of segmentation algorithms. We illustrate these techniques with a case study comparing two popular multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation algorithms: OASIS and LesionTOADS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brainlesion : glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries. BrainLes (Workshop)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75238-9_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

Dice重叠比通常用于评价图像分割算法的性能。虽然Dice重叠在许多应用中作为分割精度的标准化定量测量非常有用,但它在复杂的分割任务中提供了非常有限的分割质量图像,其中目标对象的数量是未知的,例如白质病变或肺结节的分割。虽然骰子重叠仍然可以在这些应用中使用,但分割算法可能以不同的方式执行,而不是通过骰子得分的差异来反映。在这里,我们提出了一套新的评估技术,为分割算法的行为提供了新的见解。我们通过比较两种流行的多发性硬化症(MS)病变分割算法OASIS和LesionTOADS的案例研究来说明这些技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Dice Overlap Measures for Objects of Unknown Number: Application to Lesion Segmentation.

Dice Overlap Measures for Objects of Unknown Number: Application to Lesion Segmentation.

Dice Overlap Measures for Objects of Unknown Number: Application to Lesion Segmentation.

Dice Overlap Measures for Objects of Unknown Number: Application to Lesion Segmentation.

The Dice overlap ratio is commonly used to evaluate the performance of image segmentation algorithms. While Dice overlap is very useful as a standardized quantitative measure of segmentation accuracy in many applications, it offers a very limited picture of segmentation quality in complex segmentation tasks where the number of target objects is not known a priori, such as the segmentation of white matter lesions or lung nodules. While Dice overlap can still be used in these applications, segmentation algorithms may perform quite differently in ways not reflected by differences in their Dice score. Here we propose a new set of evaluation techniques that offer new insights into the behavior of segmentation algorithms. We illustrate these techniques with a case study comparing two popular multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion segmentation algorithms: OASIS and LesionTOADS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信