多传感器阵列测量早期脑卒中幸存者活动回合能量消耗的有效性。

IF 1.8 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Stroke Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2018-03-07 eCollection Date: 2018-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2018/9134547
Sharon Flora Kramer, Liam Johnson, Julie Bernhardt, Toby Cumming
{"title":"多传感器阵列测量早期脑卒中幸存者活动回合能量消耗的有效性。","authors":"Sharon Flora Kramer,&nbsp;Liam Johnson,&nbsp;Julie Bernhardt,&nbsp;Toby Cumming","doi":"10.1155/2018/9134547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> Stroke survivors use more energy than healthy people during activities such as walking, which has consequences for the way exercise is prescribed for stroke survivors. There is a need for wearable device that can validly measure energy expenditure (EE) of activity to inform exercise prescription early after stroke. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the SenseWear-Armband (SWA) to measure EE and step-counts during activity <1 month after stroke. <i>Materials and Methods.</i> EE was measured using the SWA and metabolic cart and steps-counts were measured using the SWA and direct observation. Based on walking ability, participants performed 2x six-minute walks or repeated sit-to-stands. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability were determined by calculating intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients. <i>Results and Discussion.</i> Thirteen participants walked; nine performed sit-to-stands. Validity of the SWA measuring EE for both activities was poor (ICC/CCC < 0.40). The SWA overestimates EE during walking and underestimated EE during sit-to-stands. Test-retest agreement showed an ICC/CCC of <0.40 and >0.75 for walking and sit-to-stand, respectively. However, agreement levels changed with increasing EE levels (i.e., proportional bias). The SWA did not accurately measure step-counts. <i>Conclusion.</i> The SWA should be used with caution to measure EE of activity of mild to moderate stroke survivors <1 month after stroke.</p>","PeriodicalId":22054,"journal":{"name":"Stroke Research and Treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/9134547","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity of Multisensor Array for Measuring Energy Expenditure of an Activity Bout in Early Stroke Survivors.\",\"authors\":\"Sharon Flora Kramer,&nbsp;Liam Johnson,&nbsp;Julie Bernhardt,&nbsp;Toby Cumming\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2018/9134547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Introduction.</i> Stroke survivors use more energy than healthy people during activities such as walking, which has consequences for the way exercise is prescribed for stroke survivors. There is a need for wearable device that can validly measure energy expenditure (EE) of activity to inform exercise prescription early after stroke. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the SenseWear-Armband (SWA) to measure EE and step-counts during activity <1 month after stroke. <i>Materials and Methods.</i> EE was measured using the SWA and metabolic cart and steps-counts were measured using the SWA and direct observation. Based on walking ability, participants performed 2x six-minute walks or repeated sit-to-stands. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability were determined by calculating intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients. <i>Results and Discussion.</i> Thirteen participants walked; nine performed sit-to-stands. Validity of the SWA measuring EE for both activities was poor (ICC/CCC < 0.40). The SWA overestimates EE during walking and underestimated EE during sit-to-stands. Test-retest agreement showed an ICC/CCC of <0.40 and >0.75 for walking and sit-to-stand, respectively. However, agreement levels changed with increasing EE levels (i.e., proportional bias). The SWA did not accurately measure step-counts. <i>Conclusion.</i> The SWA should be used with caution to measure EE of activity of mild to moderate stroke survivors <1 month after stroke.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2018/9134547\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stroke Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9134547\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2018/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9134547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2018/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

介绍。中风幸存者在散步等活动中比健康人消耗更多的能量,这对中风幸存者的锻炼方式有影响。需要一种可穿戴设备,可以有效地测量活动的能量消耗(EE),以便在中风后早期告知运动处方。我们的目的是确定SenseWear-Armband (SWA)在活动期间测量EE和步数的有效性和可靠性。用SWA和代谢车测量EE,用SWA和直接观察测量步数。根据行走能力,参与者进行2次6分钟的步行或重复的从坐到站。通过计算类内相关系数和一致性相关系数确定并发效度和重测信度。结果和讨论。13名参与者步行;其中9人进行了坐转立的表演。SWA测量两项活动的EE的有效性较差(ICC/CCC < 0.40)。SWA高估了行走时的情感表达,而低估了坐姿到站立时的情感表达。测试-重测试协议显示步行和坐姿-站立的ICC/CCC分别为0.75。然而,认同水平随着情感表达水平的增加而变化(即比例偏差)。SWA不能准确测量步数。结论。在测量轻度至中度中风幸存者的情感表达活动时,应谨慎使用SWA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validity of Multisensor Array for Measuring Energy Expenditure of an Activity Bout in Early Stroke Survivors.

Validity of Multisensor Array for Measuring Energy Expenditure of an Activity Bout in Early Stroke Survivors.

Validity of Multisensor Array for Measuring Energy Expenditure of an Activity Bout in Early Stroke Survivors.

Validity of Multisensor Array for Measuring Energy Expenditure of an Activity Bout in Early Stroke Survivors.

Introduction. Stroke survivors use more energy than healthy people during activities such as walking, which has consequences for the way exercise is prescribed for stroke survivors. There is a need for wearable device that can validly measure energy expenditure (EE) of activity to inform exercise prescription early after stroke. We aimed to determine the validity and reliability of the SenseWear-Armband (SWA) to measure EE and step-counts during activity <1 month after stroke. Materials and Methods. EE was measured using the SWA and metabolic cart and steps-counts were measured using the SWA and direct observation. Based on walking ability, participants performed 2x six-minute walks or repeated sit-to-stands. Concurrent validity and test-retest reliability were determined by calculating intraclass and concordance correlation coefficients. Results and Discussion. Thirteen participants walked; nine performed sit-to-stands. Validity of the SWA measuring EE for both activities was poor (ICC/CCC < 0.40). The SWA overestimates EE during walking and underestimated EE during sit-to-stands. Test-retest agreement showed an ICC/CCC of <0.40 and >0.75 for walking and sit-to-stand, respectively. However, agreement levels changed with increasing EE levels (i.e., proportional bias). The SWA did not accurately measure step-counts. Conclusion. The SWA should be used with caution to measure EE of activity of mild to moderate stroke survivors <1 month after stroke.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stroke Research and Treatment
Stroke Research and Treatment PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信