基于对梨形四膜虫、黑头鲦鱼和大水蚤的毒性增强预测有机化合物的皮肤致敏潜力。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY
Weicheng Zhang, Libao Chen, Lunguang Yao
{"title":"基于对梨形四膜虫、黑头鲦鱼和大水蚤的毒性增强预测有机化合物的皮肤致敏潜力。","authors":"Weicheng Zhang,&nbsp;Libao Chen,&nbsp;Lunguang Yao","doi":"10.1080/1547691X.2018.1465144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Skin sensitization is an important occupational health problem and immunotoxicity endpoint. Considering animal welfare and time and cost savings, many alternative approaches, such as those conducted in vitro, in silico, and in chemo, have been proposed and applied to predict skin sensitization of compounds. Toxicologically, sensitizers can elicit excess toxicity at greater levels than non-sensitizers due to their capacity to react with proteins/peptides. Based on this understanding, calculated toxicity enhancements (T<sub>e</sub>) of 65 organic compounds from three in vitro bioassays, i.e. 48-hr ciliate (Tetrahymena pyriformis) growth inhibition, and both 96-hr fathead minnow and 48-hr Daphnia magna acute lethal toxicities, were employed to qualitatively and quantitatively predict skin sensitization potencies of the test agents. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy reaching 80% strongly suggested toxicity enhancement was an excellent parameter for predicting skin sensitization. Linear regressions of skin sensitization against toxicity enhancement were fitted for each bioassay, and they were improved after the sensitizers were categorized into different reaction mechanistic domains, which, in decreasing order of contribution from T<sub>e</sub> to sensitization, were S<sub>N</sub>Ar > S<sub>N</sub>1 > MA. These results indicated that toxicity bioassays are useful tools and that T<sub>e</sub> could be a useful parameter that might be applied to predict skin sensitization.</p>","PeriodicalId":16073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","volume":"15 1","pages":"82-89"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547691X.2018.1465144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting skin sensitization potential of organic compounds based on toxicity enhancement to Tetrahymena pyriformis, fathead minnow, and Daphnia magna.\",\"authors\":\"Weicheng Zhang,&nbsp;Libao Chen,&nbsp;Lunguang Yao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1547691X.2018.1465144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Skin sensitization is an important occupational health problem and immunotoxicity endpoint. Considering animal welfare and time and cost savings, many alternative approaches, such as those conducted in vitro, in silico, and in chemo, have been proposed and applied to predict skin sensitization of compounds. Toxicologically, sensitizers can elicit excess toxicity at greater levels than non-sensitizers due to their capacity to react with proteins/peptides. Based on this understanding, calculated toxicity enhancements (T<sub>e</sub>) of 65 organic compounds from three in vitro bioassays, i.e. 48-hr ciliate (Tetrahymena pyriformis) growth inhibition, and both 96-hr fathead minnow and 48-hr Daphnia magna acute lethal toxicities, were employed to qualitatively and quantitatively predict skin sensitization potencies of the test agents. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy reaching 80% strongly suggested toxicity enhancement was an excellent parameter for predicting skin sensitization. Linear regressions of skin sensitization against toxicity enhancement were fitted for each bioassay, and they were improved after the sensitizers were categorized into different reaction mechanistic domains, which, in decreasing order of contribution from T<sub>e</sub> to sensitization, were S<sub>N</sub>Ar > S<sub>N</sub>1 > MA. These results indicated that toxicity bioassays are useful tools and that T<sub>e</sub> could be a useful parameter that might be applied to predict skin sensitization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Immunotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"82-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/1547691X.2018.1465144\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Immunotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2018.1465144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Immunotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1547691X.2018.1465144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

皮肤致敏是一个重要的职业健康问题和免疫毒性终点。考虑到动物福利、时间和成本节约,许多替代方法,如体外、硅和化疗方法,已被提出并应用于预测化合物的皮肤致敏性。从毒理学上讲,由于增敏剂与蛋白质/多肽的反应能力,它们比非增敏剂在更大的水平上引起过量毒性。在此基础上,通过三种体外生物测定,即48小时纤毛虫(Tetrahymena pyriformis)生长抑制,以及96小时鱼头鲦鱼和48小时大水蚤的急性致死毒性,计算65种有机化合物的毒性增强(Te),用于定性和定量预测试验剂的皮肤致敏效力。灵敏度、特异度和准确度达到80%,表明毒性增强是预测皮肤致敏的一个很好的参数。将致敏剂划分为不同的反应机制域后,皮肤致敏性对毒性增强的线性回归得到改善,从Te对致敏性的贡献大小依次为SNAr > SN1 > MA。这些结果表明,毒性生物测定是有用的工具,Te可能是一个有用的参数,可用于预测皮肤致敏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting skin sensitization potential of organic compounds based on toxicity enhancement to Tetrahymena pyriformis, fathead minnow, and Daphnia magna.

Skin sensitization is an important occupational health problem and immunotoxicity endpoint. Considering animal welfare and time and cost savings, many alternative approaches, such as those conducted in vitro, in silico, and in chemo, have been proposed and applied to predict skin sensitization of compounds. Toxicologically, sensitizers can elicit excess toxicity at greater levels than non-sensitizers due to their capacity to react with proteins/peptides. Based on this understanding, calculated toxicity enhancements (Te) of 65 organic compounds from three in vitro bioassays, i.e. 48-hr ciliate (Tetrahymena pyriformis) growth inhibition, and both 96-hr fathead minnow and 48-hr Daphnia magna acute lethal toxicities, were employed to qualitatively and quantitatively predict skin sensitization potencies of the test agents. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy reaching 80% strongly suggested toxicity enhancement was an excellent parameter for predicting skin sensitization. Linear regressions of skin sensitization against toxicity enhancement were fitted for each bioassay, and they were improved after the sensitizers were categorized into different reaction mechanistic domains, which, in decreasing order of contribution from Te to sensitization, were SNAr > SN1 > MA. These results indicated that toxicity bioassays are useful tools and that Te could be a useful parameter that might be applied to predict skin sensitization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Immunotoxicology
Journal of Immunotoxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Immunotoxicology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides a needed singular forum for the international community of immunotoxicologists, immunologists, and toxicologists working in academia, government, consulting, and industry to both publish their original research and be made aware of the research findings of their colleagues in a timely manner. Research from many subdisciplines are presented in the journal, including the areas of molecular, developmental, pulmonary, regulatory, nutritional, mechanistic, wildlife, and environmental immunotoxicology, immunology, and toxicology. Original research articles as well as timely comprehensive reviews are published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信