Leszek Miszczyk, Aleksandra Napieralska, Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka, Grzegorz Woźniak, Małgorzata Stapór-Fudzińska, Grzegorz Głowacki, Andrzej Tukiendorf
{"title":"前列腺癌患者的射波刀。更新200例患者的治疗结果]。","authors":"Leszek Miszczyk, Aleksandra Napieralska, Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka, Grzegorz Woźniak, Małgorzata Stapór-Fudzińska, Grzegorz Głowacki, Andrzej Tukiendorf","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is an update regarding\nthe treatment results of 200\nprostate cancer patients’ (PCP) CyberKnife\nbased radioablation (the first\ngroup in Poland).\nThe purpose of this study is reevaluation\n(after 2 years) of this treatment\nmodality results of low (LR) and\nintermediate risk (IR) (including T2c)\nPCP and failure analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>200 PCP (95\nLR, 86 IR, 19 T2c) 53 – 83 y.o. (mean 69)\ntreated between 2011 and 2014. 48%\nused neoadjuvant ADT. The patients\nwere irradiated every other day with\na fraction dose of 7.25 Gy to the total\ndose 36.25 Gy (5 fractions in 9 days).\nFiducials based tracking was performed.\nThe patients were controlled\non the treatment completion day, 1, 4,\n8 months later and subsequently every\n6 months. The PSA concentration,\nADT usage, acute and late adverse effects\n(EORTC/RTOG) and other symptoms\nwere evaluated. FU ranged from\n1 to 63.6 months (mean 32.2, median\n32.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adverse effects percentage\nwas very low; only 1 month\nafter treatment the percentage of\nacute urinary reaction exceeded 40%.\nOnly single G3 adverse effects were\nnoted. Over 4 months the median\nPSA concentration declined from 3.75\nto 0.27 ng/ml. 9 failures (4.5%) were\nnoted – more among IR and patients\nwithout neoadjuvant ADT. No failure\nin the T2c group was found. Median\ntime to failure was 32.4 months. Cox\nanalysis revealed that the failure risk\nincreases with the value of maximal\nPSA before treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CK based radioablation of LR and\nIR PCP is a safe and highly effective\ntreatment modality.\nThe main prognostic factor of failure\nafter this treatment is probably\nthe maximal PSA concentration before\ntreatment.\nThe neoadjuvant ADT in IR group\nshould be considered.\nThe lack of failures in the T2c group enables us to suggest\nthat even more locally advanced patients (T3) with\nlow PSA and maximal Gleason 3+4 could be treated with\nthis modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":21148,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad lekarski","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[CyberKnife for prostate cancer patients. Update of 200 patients treatment results].\",\"authors\":\"Leszek Miszczyk, Aleksandra Napieralska, Agnieszka Namysł-Kaletka, Grzegorz Woźniak, Małgorzata Stapór-Fudzińska, Grzegorz Głowacki, Andrzej Tukiendorf\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This is an update regarding\\nthe treatment results of 200\\nprostate cancer patients’ (PCP) CyberKnife\\nbased radioablation (the first\\ngroup in Poland).\\nThe purpose of this study is reevaluation\\n(after 2 years) of this treatment\\nmodality results of low (LR) and\\nintermediate risk (IR) (including T2c)\\nPCP and failure analysis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>200 PCP (95\\nLR, 86 IR, 19 T2c) 53 – 83 y.o. (mean 69)\\ntreated between 2011 and 2014. 48%\\nused neoadjuvant ADT. The patients\\nwere irradiated every other day with\\na fraction dose of 7.25 Gy to the total\\ndose 36.25 Gy (5 fractions in 9 days).\\nFiducials based tracking was performed.\\nThe patients were controlled\\non the treatment completion day, 1, 4,\\n8 months later and subsequently every\\n6 months. The PSA concentration,\\nADT usage, acute and late adverse effects\\n(EORTC/RTOG) and other symptoms\\nwere evaluated. FU ranged from\\n1 to 63.6 months (mean 32.2, median\\n32.9).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adverse effects percentage\\nwas very low; only 1 month\\nafter treatment the percentage of\\nacute urinary reaction exceeded 40%.\\nOnly single G3 adverse effects were\\nnoted. Over 4 months the median\\nPSA concentration declined from 3.75\\nto 0.27 ng/ml. 9 failures (4.5%) were\\nnoted – more among IR and patients\\nwithout neoadjuvant ADT. No failure\\nin the T2c group was found. Median\\ntime to failure was 32.4 months. Cox\\nanalysis revealed that the failure risk\\nincreases with the value of maximal\\nPSA before treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CK based radioablation of LR and\\nIR PCP is a safe and highly effective\\ntreatment modality.\\nThe main prognostic factor of failure\\nafter this treatment is probably\\nthe maximal PSA concentration before\\ntreatment.\\nThe neoadjuvant ADT in IR group\\nshould be considered.\\nThe lack of failures in the T2c group enables us to suggest\\nthat even more locally advanced patients (T3) with\\nlow PSA and maximal Gleason 3+4 could be treated with\\nthis modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad lekarski\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad lekarski\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad lekarski","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
[CyberKnife for prostate cancer patients. Update of 200 patients treatment results].
Introduction: This is an update regarding
the treatment results of 200
prostate cancer patients’ (PCP) CyberKnife
based radioablation (the first
group in Poland).
The purpose of this study is reevaluation
(after 2 years) of this treatment
modality results of low (LR) and
intermediate risk (IR) (including T2c)
PCP and failure analysis.
Material and methods: 200 PCP (95
LR, 86 IR, 19 T2c) 53 – 83 y.o. (mean 69)
treated between 2011 and 2014. 48%
used neoadjuvant ADT. The patients
were irradiated every other day with
a fraction dose of 7.25 Gy to the total
dose 36.25 Gy (5 fractions in 9 days).
Fiducials based tracking was performed.
The patients were controlled
on the treatment completion day, 1, 4,
8 months later and subsequently every
6 months. The PSA concentration,
ADT usage, acute and late adverse effects
(EORTC/RTOG) and other symptoms
were evaluated. FU ranged from
1 to 63.6 months (mean 32.2, median
32.9).
Results: The adverse effects percentage
was very low; only 1 month
after treatment the percentage of
acute urinary reaction exceeded 40%.
Only single G3 adverse effects were
noted. Over 4 months the median
PSA concentration declined from 3.75
to 0.27 ng/ml. 9 failures (4.5%) were
noted – more among IR and patients
without neoadjuvant ADT. No failure
in the T2c group was found. Median
time to failure was 32.4 months. Cox
analysis revealed that the failure risk
increases with the value of maximal
PSA before treatment.
Conclusions: CK based radioablation of LR and
IR PCP is a safe and highly effective
treatment modality.
The main prognostic factor of failure
after this treatment is probably
the maximal PSA concentration before
treatment.
The neoadjuvant ADT in IR group
should be considered.
The lack of failures in the T2c group enables us to suggest
that even more locally advanced patients (T3) with
low PSA and maximal Gleason 3+4 could be treated with
this modality.